The microstructure and mechanical properties of Fe–Cu materials fabricated by pressure-less-shaping of nanocrystalline powders
Source abstract
Abstract
The microstructure of Fe-40%wtCu nanocrystalline powders, prepared by mechanical alloying, was studied before and after the consolidation process. Pressure-less-shaping (PS) was used to consolidate the powders. The PS technique, similar to metal injection moulding (MIM), does not require external pressure in order to fill up the mould. The key factor of the process of consolidation is the use as binder a hybrid inorganic–organic monomer, formed by the reaction of zirconium propoxide and 2-hydroxy ethyl methacrylate. This type of monomer, mixed with the metallic powders, formed slurry having low viscosity, which was easily poured into mould. The binder stiffened upon polymerization. Some pieces were produced through debinding and sintering, both performed under inert atmosphere in order to avoid metal oxidation. Different microstructure and density were observed depending on the maximum sintering temperatures, ranging from 904 to 1,120 °C. In the sample sintered at 1,120 °C, the crystalline domains of the copper phase were of about 40 nm.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials · Advanced materials and composites · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Ma E (2000) Powder Metall 43:306
2. German RM (1984) Powder injection moulding. Metal Powder Industries Federation, Princeton, New Jersey
3. Wang JS, Lin SP, Hon MH, Wang MC (2000) Jpn J Appl Phys 39:61610.1143/JJAP.39.616 ↗
4. Di Maggio R, Gialanella S, Cesconi M, Molinari A (2003) Mater Sci Technol 19:158510.1179/026708303225008121 ↗
5. Di Maggio R, Fambri L, Guerriero A (1998) Chem Mater 10:177710.1021/cm970694j ↗
6. Di Maggio R, Fambri L, Cesconi M, Vaona W (2002) Macromolecules 35:534210.1021/ma012265j ↗
7. Lenel FV, Hwang KS (1980) Powder Metall Int 12:581
8. Lenel FV (1980) Powder metallurgy: principle and application. Metal Powder Industries Federation, Princeton, NJ, p 285
9. Wanible Y, Yokoyama H, Itoh T (1990) Powder Metall 33:6510.1179/pom.1990.33.1.65 ↗
10. Huang CT, Hwang KS (1996) Powder Metall 39:11910.1179/pom.1996.39.2.119 ↗
11. Lawlock RL, Davies TJ (1990) Powder Metall 33:14710.1179/pom.1990.33.2.147 ↗
12. Shen P, Hu JD, Guo ZX, Guan QF (1999) Metall Mater Trans 30A:222910.1007/s11661-999-0035-7 ↗
13. Holtz RL, Provenzano V (1994) Nanostruct Mater 4:24110.1016/0965-9773(94)90082-5 ↗
14. He L, Ma E (1996) Nanostruct Mater 7:327 and references therein10.1016/0965-9773(96)00003-7 ↗
15. He L, Ma E (1996) J Mater Res 11:7210.1557/JMR.1996.0010 ↗
16. Lutterotti L, Matthies S, Wenk H-R (1999) IUCr. Newsletter of the CPD 21:14
17. Deletz R (1993) In: Young RA (ed) The Rietveld method. IUCR monographs on crystallography
18. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) J Mater Res 7:156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
19. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (2004) J Mater Res 19:310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
20. Ma E, Atzmon M, Pinkerton FE (1993) J Appl Phys 74:95510.1063/1.354837 ↗
21. Lábár JL (2002) Microscopy and analysis 75:9
22. Huang Z, Gu LY, Weertman JR (1997) Scripta Materialia 37:107110.1016/S1359-6462(97)00209-1 ↗
23. Yamaguchi K, Takakura N, Imatani S (1997) J Mater Proc Technol 63:36410.1016/S0924-0136(96)02648-9 ↗
24. Radchenko OG, Getman OI (2001) Int J Hydr Energy 26:48910.1016/S0360-3199(00)00084-7 ↗
25. Entel P, Kreth M, Meyer R, Kadau K (2004) Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on computational modeling and simulation of materials. In: Vincenzini P, Zerbetto F (eds) Advances in science and technology, vol 44. Acireale Italy, Techna Group, pp 101–112
26. Lee GH, Rhee CK, Lee MK, Kim WW, Ivanov VV (2004) Mater Sci Eng A 375–377:60410.1016/j.msea.2003.10.100 ↗