Synthesis, characterization and mechanical behaviour of an in situ consolidated nanocrystalline FeCrNi alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
IntroductionCurrently, nanocrystalline materials are being widelyinvestigated due to their unique properties. This interest hasspawned the development of various techniques to synthe-size materials exhibiting grain sizes (\20 nm) wherephysical properties are the most exotic. Such processesinclude: high-energy ball milling [1, 2], pulsed electrode-position [3], chemical vapour condensation [4], inert gascondensation [5] etc. However, nanocrystalline samplesproduced from these techniques are either in the formof powders or thin films. Successful consolidation to arte-fact free, fully dense material is required if structuralapplications are ever to be adopted. Many methods toconsolidate these materials (i.e., hot compaction [6],explosive consolidation [7], hot isostatic pressing [8], pre-annealing–compaction–sintering [9] etc.) have been repor-ted in the literature with partial success. In general, thesuccess of these techniques for consolidation hinges on theapplication of high temperatures and pressures, which leadto explosive grain growth in nanocrystalline materials.In situ consolidation technique as developed by Youssefet al. [10] seems promising for the synthesis of consolidatednanocrystalline materials as the step of sintering to bulkdensity is no longer a need and can be eliminated. However,this technique has not been reported widely in the literatureand has been limited to nanocrystalline Zn, Al, Al alloys,copper and copper-based alloys [10, 11]. This study showsthat in situ consolidation of a FeCrNi alloy is possible usingcombination of room temperature (RT) milling and liquidnitrogen temperature milling.Nanocrystalline materials produced by high-energy ballmilling have not been well characterized and the micro-structure of these materials is not well understood. Theprimary challenge in characterization is TEM samplepreparation from ball-milled powders. Nanocrystallinepowders as produced by ball milling are too coarse to beexamined under TEM and the sample preparation for TEManalysis on such powders is not a trivial task. In general,two methods are used for the preparation of conventionalmetallic samples for TEM analysis: electro jet polishingand dimpling followed by ion milling. Nanocrystallinematerials produced by consolidation of ball-milled pow-ders can be problematic for these preparation techniques asthe consolidated samples must first be mechanically thin-ned to \100 lm before being chemically thinned to thefinal thickness. If the material exhibits poor inter-particlebonding, the sample may not withstand the final thinning
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Koch CC (1993) Nanostruct Mater 2:10910.1016/0965-9773(93)90016-5 ↗
2. Murty BS, Ranganathan S (1998) Int Mater Rev 43:10110.1179/imr.1998.43.3.101 ↗
3. Karimpoor AA, Erb U, Aust KT, Palumbo G (2003) Scr Mater 49:65110.1016/S1359-6462(03)00397-X ↗
4. Choi CJ, Dong XL, Kim BK (2001) Scr Mater 44:222510.1016/S1359-6462(01)00750-3 ↗
5. Gleiter H (1989) Prog Mater Sci 33:22310.1016/0079-6425(89)90001-7 ↗
6. Kedim OE, Cao HS, Guay D (2002) J Mater Process Technol 121:38310.1016/S0924-0136(01)01225-0 ↗
7. Guruswamy S, Srisukhumbowornchai N, Michael KM, Joseph P (2000) IEEE Trans 36:3219
8. Rawers J, Biancaniello F, Jiggetts R, Fields R, Williams M (1999) Scr Mater 40:27710.1016/S1359-6462(98)00425-4 ↗
9. Gupta R, Singh Raman RK, Koch CC (2008) Mater Sci Eng A 464:25310.1016/j.msea.2008.04.019 ↗
10. Youssef KM, Scattergood RO, Murty KL, Koch CC (2004) Appl Phys Lett 85:92910.1063/1.1779342 ↗
11. Rajulapati KV (2006) PhD thesis, NC State University
12. Guduru RK, Darling KA, Kishore R, Scattergood RO, Koch CC, Murty KL (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 395:30710.1016/j.msea.2004.12.048 ↗
13. Guduru RK, Darling KA, Scattergood RO, Koch CC, Murty KL (2007) J Mater Sci 42:5581. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-1095-310.1007/s10853-006-1095-3 ↗
14. Koch CC (2003) Rev Adv Mater Sci 5:91
15. Koch CC (2001) In: Robert KHJB, Merton WC, Bernard CF, Edward I, Subash JK, Patrick V (eds) Encyclopedia of materials: science and technology. Elsevier, Oxford, p 5901
16. Koch CC, Scattergood RO, Murty KL, Guduru RK, Trichy G, Rajulapati KV (2006) Mater Res Soc Sympos Proc 791:51
17. Meyers MA, Mishra A, Benson DJ (2006) Prog Mater Sci 51:42710.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
18. Valiev RZ, Murashkin MY, Kilmametov A, Straumal B, Chinh NY, Langdon TG (2010) J Mater Sci 45:4718. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4588-z10.1007/s10853-010-4588-z ↗
19. Mazilkin AA, Straumal BB, Rabkin E, Baretzky B, Enders S, Protasova SG, Kongtenkova OA, Valiev RZ (2006) Acta Mater 54:393310.1016/j.actamat.2006.04.025 ↗
20. Straumal BB, Mazilkin AA, Protasova SG, Myatiev AA, Straumal PB, Baretzky B (2008) Acta Mater 56:624610.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.032 ↗
21. Straumal B, Baretzky B, Mazilkin A, Protasova S, Myatiev A, Straumal P (2009) J Eur Ceram Soc 29:196310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.01.005 ↗
22. Gupta RK (2010) PhD thesis, Monash University
23. Gupta RK, Singh Raman RK, Koch CC (2010) J Mater Sci 45:4884. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4665-310.1007/s10853-010-4665-3 ↗