Improving shear bond strength of temporary crown and fixed dental prosthesis resins by surface treatments
Source abstract
Abstract
This study evaluated the effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired temporary resins. One-hundred flat-surfaced cylindrical specimens (Ø 7 mm × 12 mm) of each temporary resin (2 bis-acryl resins and 2 polymethyl-methacrylates) were prepared. The specimens were randomly divided into 10 groups ( n = 10), according to the types of surface treatments: untreated, adhesive treated, silanated, silane + adhesive treated, hydrofluoric acid etched, laser treated, sandblasted, sandblasting + adhesive treated, sandblasting + silanated, and tribochemical silica coating + silanated. Each resin material of the same brand with cylindrical shape (Ø 3 mm × 3 mm) was polymerized onto the resin surfaces, and specimens were stored for 24 h in distilled water. The shear bond strengths were measured and failure modes were examined. All data were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA and multiple comparison Scheffé post hoc test ( α = 0.05). For bis-acryl resins, the highest shear bond strength was observed in sandblasted group and the lowest was observed in the control group. Results show that the repair bond strength was improved for bis-acryl resin by 23 % than that of the control group due to the increase in surface roughness by sandblasting. However, chemical treatment did not improve repair bond strength. The surface treatment of bis-acryl resins with sandblasting seems to be promising for the improvement of repair bond strength.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental Research and COVID-19
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Gratton DG, Aquilino SA (2004) Interim restorations. Dent Clin North Am 48(vii):487–497. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.00710.1016/j.cden.2003.12.007 ↗
2. Gergauff AG, Holloway JA (2000) Provisional restorations. In: Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J (eds) Contemporary fixed prosthodontics, 3rd edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 380–416
3. el-Ebrashi MK, Craig RG, Peyton FA (1970) Experimental stress analysis of dental restorations. VII. Structural design and stress analysis of fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 23:177–18610.1016/0022-3913(70)90295-7 ↗
4. Kim SH, Watts DC (2007) In vitro study of edge-strength of provisional polymer-based crown and fixed partial denture materials. Dent Mater 23:1570–1573. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.02310.1016/j.dental.2007.06.023 ↗
5. da Costa TR, Serrano AM, Atman AP, Loguercio AD, Reis A (2012) Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J Dent 40:513–521. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.00110.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.001 ↗
6. Hickel R, Brushaver K, Ilie N (2013) Repair of restorations—criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Dent Mater 29:28–50. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.00610.1016/j.dental.2012.07.006 ↗
7. Ozcan M, Corazza PH, Marocho SM, Barbosa SH, Bottino MA (2013) Repair bond strength of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites: effect of substrate resin type, surface conditioning and ageing. Clin Oral Investig 17:1751–1758. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0863-510.1007/s00784-012-0863-5 ↗
8. Baur V, Ilie N (2013) Repair of dental resin-based composites. Clin Oral Investig 17:601–608. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0722-410.1007/s00784-012-0722-4 ↗
9. Bacchi A, Consani RL, Sinhoreti MA, Feitosa VP, Cavalcante LM, Pfeifer CS, Schneider LF (2013) Repair bond strength in aged methacrylate- and silorane-based composites. J Adhes Dent 15:447–452. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a29590
10. El-Askary FS, El-Banna AH, van Noort R (2012) Immediate vs delayed repair bond strength of a nanohybrid resin composite. J Adhes Dent 14:265–274. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a22716
11. Melo MA, Moyses MR, Santos SG, Alcantara CE, Ribeiro JC (2011) Effects of different surface treatments and accelerated artificial aging on the bond strength of composite resin repairs. Braz Oral Res 25:485–49110.1590/S1806-83242011000600003 ↗
12. Koumjian JH, Nimmo A (1990) Evaluation of fracture resistance of resins used for provisional restorations. J Prosthet Dent 64:654–65710.1016/0022-3913(90)90290-S ↗
13. Hammond BD, Cooper JR 3rd, Lazarchik DA (2009) Predictable repair of provisional restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 21:19–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00225.x discussion 2510.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00225.x ↗
14. Chen HL, Lai YL, Chou IC, Hu CJ, Lee SY (2008) Shear bond strength of provisional restoration materials repaired with light-cured resins. Oper Dent 33:508–515. doi: 10.2341/07-13010.2341/07-130 ↗
15. Patras M, Naka O, Doukoudakis S, Pissiotis A (2012) Management of provisional restorations’ deficiencies: a literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent 24:26–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00467.x10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00467.x ↗
16. Turner CW, Meiers JC (1993) Repair of an aged, contaminated indirect composite resin with a direct, visible-light-cured composite resin. Oper Dent 18:187–194
17. Kimyai S, Oskoee SS, Mohammadi N, Rikhtegaran S, Bahari M, Oskoee PA, Vahedpour H (2015) Effect of different mechanical and chemical surface treatments on the repaired bond strength of an indirect composite resin. Lasers Med Sci 30:653–659. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1391-510.1007/s10103-013-1391-5 ↗
18. Eliades GC, Caputo AA (1989) The strength of layering technique in visible light-cured composites. J Prosthet Dent 61:31–3810.1016/0022-3913(89)90104-2 ↗
19. Eli I, Liberman R, Levi N, Haspel Y (1988) Bond strength of joined posterior light-cured composites: comparison of surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent 60:185–18910.1016/0022-3913(88)90313-7 ↗
20. Pounder B, Gregory WA, Powers JM (1987) Bond strengths of repaired composite resins. Oper Dent 12:127–131
21. Gregory WA, Pounder B, Bakus E (1990) Bond strengths of chemically dissimilar repaired composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 64:664–66810.1016/0022-3913(90)90292-K ↗
22. Mohammadi N, Savadi Oskoee S, Abed Kahnamoui M, Bahari M, Kimyai S, Rikhtegaran S (2013) Effect of Er, Cr:YSGG pretreatment on bond strength of fiber posts to root canal dentin using a self-adhesive resin cement. Lasers Med Sci 28:65–69. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1063-x10.1007/s10103-012-1063-x ↗
23. Perussi LR, Pavone C, de Oliveira GJ, Cerri PS, Marcantonio RA (2012) Effects of the Er, Cr:YSGG laser on bone and soft tissue in a rat model. Lasers Med Sci 27:95–102. doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0920-310.1007/s10103-011-0920-3 ↗
24. Swift EJ Jr, LeValley BD, Boyer DB (1992) Evaluation of new methods for composite repair. Dent Mater 8:362–36510.1016/0109-5641(92)90020-D ↗
25. Ozcan M, Alander P, Vallittu PK, Huysmans MC, Kalk W (2005) Effect of three surface conditioning methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med 16:21–27. doi: 10.1007/s10856-005-6442-410.1007/s10856-005-6442-4 ↗
26. Bouschlicher MR, Reinhardt JW, Vargas MA (1997) Surface treatment techniques for resin composite repair. Am J Dent 10:279–283
27. Kula K, Nelson S, Kula T, Thompson V (1986) In vitro effect of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel on the surface of composites with different filler particles. J Prosthet Dent 56:161–16910.1016/0022-3913(86)90465-8 ↗
28. Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG (1998) Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. J Dent 26:685–69410.1016/S0300-5712(97)00044-4 ↗
29. Oztas N, Alacam A, Bardakcy Y (2003) The effect of air abrasion with two new bonding agents on composite repair. Oper Dent 28:149–154
30. Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R (1997) Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent 77:122–12610.1016/S0022-3913(97)70224-5 ↗
31. Puckett AD, Holder R, O’Hara JW (1991) Strength of posterior composite repairs using different composite/bonding agent combinations. Oper Dent 16:136–140
32. Teixeira EC, Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Ritter AV, Swift EJ (2005) Shear bond strength of self-etching bonding systems in combination with various composites used for repairing aged composites. J Adhes Dent 7:159–164
33. Lastumaki TM, Kallio TT, Vallittu PK (2002) The bond strength of light-curing composite resin to finally polymerized and aged glass fiber-reinforced composite substrate. Biomaterials 23:4533–453910.1016/S0142-9612(02)00197-7 ↗
34. Hagge MS, Lindemuth JS, Jones AG (2002) Shear bond strength of bis-acryl composite provisional material repaired with flowable composite. J Esthet Restor Dent 14:47–5210.1111/j.1708-8240.2002.tb00147.x ↗
35. Ozcan M (2002) The use of chairside silica coating for different dental applications: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 87:469–47210.1067/mpr.2002.124365 ↗
36. Ozcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, Galhano GA, Bottino MA (2007) Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater 23:1276–1282. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.00710.1016/j.dental.2006.11.007 ↗
37. Floyd CJ, Dickens SH (2006) Network structure of Bis-GMA- and UDMA-based resin systems. Dent Mater 22:1143–1149. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.10.00910.1016/j.dental.2005.10.009 ↗
38. Chay SH, Wong SL, Mohamed N, Chia A, Yap AU (2007) Effects of surface treatment and aging on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets to provisional materials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132:577.e7–577.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.01.024