journal article·2020-10

Noncovalent heterointerface on boron–carbon hybrid for improved microwave absorption

Qingsong Li, Qiangchun Liu, Xiangkai Kong

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 55· Issue 29
Publisher page

Abstract

Metal-free hybrids possess many advantages when compared with metal-based materials, such as lightweight, low cost, and high stability, which offer great potential for them to be used in wide applications, such as microwave absorption. Bare carbon materials, especially for those derived from wasted biomass, normally cannot simultaneously exhibit strong and broadband absorption performance, due to their specific structures and high electronic conductivity, leading to more incident microwave reflected on surface. Herein, based on wasted grapefruit peels, 2D metal-free hybrids are designed and prepared with pre-exfoliated boron nanoflakes as the modulation. Noncovalent interaction is formed at their heterojunction, which endows them with properties that cannot be supplied by their individual components. As a result, interfacial polarizations and dipole polarizations are generated between the layers, benefiting the dielectric loss and impedance matching behaviors. Microwave absorption measurements demonstrate that the minimum reflection loss can reach − 47.9 dB and the effective absorption frequency band is 4.32 GHz, at 1.5 mm thickness. We hope these represent an addition to the family of sustainable biomass-derived microwave absorbents.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Song ZM, Liu XF, Sun X et al (2019) Carbon 151:36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.05.02510.1016/j.carbon.2019.05.025 ↗
2. Hu PT, Dong S, Li XT et al (2019) J Mater Chem C 7:9219. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9tc02182e10.1039/c9tc02182e ↗
3. Liang LY, Han GJ, Li Y et al (2019) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:25399. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b0729410.1021/acsami.9b07294 ↗
4. Zhao HQ, Cheng Y, Ma JN, Zhang YN, Ji GB, Du YW (2018) Chem Eng J 339:432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.15110.1016/j.cej.2018.01.151 ↗
5. Green M, Chen XB (2019) J Materiomics 5:503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat.2019.07.00310.1016/j.jmat.2019.07.003 ↗
6. Ansari N, Nazari F, Illas F (2014) Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:21473. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cp02552k10.1039/c4cp02552k ↗
7. Wu NN, Liu C, Xu DM et al (2019) J Mater Chem C 7:1659. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8tc04984j10.1039/c8tc04984j ↗
8. Liu QL, Wang SN, Chen GL, Liu QC, Kong XK (2019) Inorg Chem 58:11843. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b0228010.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02280 ↗
9. Moni P, Pollachini MG, Wilhelm M et al (2019) ACS Appl Energy Mater 2:6078. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.9b0127610.1021/acsaem.9b01276 ↗
10. Feng S, Song JH, Zhu CZ et al (2019) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:5911. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b1754910.1021/acsami.8b17549 ↗
11. Zhang DQ, Liu TT, Cheng JY et al (2019) Nanotechnology 30:9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab35fa10.1088/1361-6528/ab35fa ↗
12. Yang ML, Yuan Y, Li Y et al (2020) Carbon 161:517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.07310.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.073 ↗
13. Huang LN, Chen CG, Li ZJ et al (2020) Nanotechnology 31:19. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab50af10.1088/1361-6528/ab50af ↗
14. Kumar P (2019) Adv Mater Interfaces 6:24. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.20190145410.1002/admi.201901454 ↗
15. Green M, Liu Z, Smedley R et al (2018) Mater Today Phys 5:78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2018.06.00510.1016/j.mtphys.2018.06.005 ↗
16. Pang H, Pang WH, Zhang B, Ren N (2018) J Mater Chem C 6:11722. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8tc03582b10.1039/c8tc03582b ↗
17. Zhang Y, Huang Y, Zhang TF et al (2015) Adv Mater 27:2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20140578810.1002/adma.201405788 ↗
18. Hao CX, Wang BC, Wen FS et al (2018) Nanotechnology 29:9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aab83a10.1088/1361-6528/aab83a ↗
19. Liang LY, Yang RS, Han GJ et al (2020) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:2644. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b1850410.1021/acsami.9b18504 ↗
20. Wang S, Hu K, Huang F et al (2019) Carbon 152:818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.06.07910.1016/j.carbon.2019.06.079 ↗
21. Yan Y, Zhai D, Liu Y et al (2020) ACS Nano 14:1185. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b0955410.1021/acsnano.9b09554 ↗
22. Li RP, Li LJ, Cheng YC, Huang W (2018) Adv Electron Mater 4:21. https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.20180027010.1002/aelm.201800270 ↗
23. Guo L, An QD, Xiao ZY, Zhai SR, Cui L, Li ZC (2019) RSC Adv 9:16690. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra02764e10.1039/c9ra02764e ↗
24. Sun SX, Ding B, Liu RN, Wu XL (2019) J Alloy Compd 803:401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.21210.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.212 ↗
25. Lu LQ, Zhu YC, Shi C, Pei YTT (2016) Carbon 109:373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.02310.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.023 ↗
26. Zhang W, Jin XZ, Chai H, Diao GW, Piao YZ (2018) Adv Mater Interfaces 5:8. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.20180010610.1002/admi.201800106 ↗
27. Yuan G, Liang Y, Hu H et al (2019) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:26946. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b0640210.1021/acsami.9b06402 ↗
28. Ban CL, Xu ZY, Wang DW, Liu ZQ, Zhang HH (2019) Acs Sustain Chem Eng 7:10742. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0142910.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01429 ↗
29. Wang X, Shu J-C, He X-M et al (2018) Acs Sustain Chem Eng 6:14017. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0253410.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02534 ↗
30. Liu L, Yang S, Hu H et al (2019) Acs Sustain Chem Eng 7:1228. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0490710.1021/acssuschemeng.8b04907 ↗
31. Ranjan P, Sahu TK, Bhushan R et al (2019) Adv Mater 31:8. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20190035310.1002/adma.201900353 ↗
32. Feng BJ, Zhang J, Zhong Q et al (2016) Nat Chem 8:564. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.249110.1038/nchem.2491 ↗
33. Xiang Z, Song Y, Xiong J et al (2019) Carbon 142:20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.01410.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.014 ↗
34. Zhu T, Chang SC, Song YF, Lahoubi M, Wang W (2019) Chem Eng J 373:755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.07910.1016/j.cej.2019.05.079 ↗
35. Li Q, Zhu J, Wang S, Huang F, Liu Q, Kong X (2020) Carbon 161:639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.08710.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.087 ↗
36. Tao FJ, Green M, Tran ATV, Zhang YL, Yin YS, Chen XB (2019) ACS Appl Nano Mater 2:3836. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b0070010.1021/acsanm.9b00700 ↗
37. Green M, Xiang P, Liu ZQ et al (2019) J Materiomics 5:133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat.2018.12.00510.1016/j.jmat.2018.12.005 ↗
38. Green M, Liu ZQ, Xiang P et al (2018) Light Sci Appl 7:9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-018-0088-810.1038/s41377-018-0088-8 ↗
39. Dong S, Zhang WZ, Zhang XH, Hu P, Han JC (2018) Chem Eng J 354:767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.06210.1016/j.cej.2018.08.062 ↗
40. Lin HR, Green M, Xu LJ, Chen XB, Ma BW (2020) Adv Mater Interfaces 7:7. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.20190127010.1002/admi.201901270 ↗
41. ur Rehman S, Wang J, Luo Q et al (2019) Chem Eng J 373:122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.04010.1016/j.cej.2019.05.040 ↗
42. Yan F, Guo D, Zhang S et al (2018) Nanoscale 10:2697. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nr08305j10.1039/c7nr08305j ↗
43. Wang HY, Zhang YL, Wang QY et al (2019) RSC Adv 9:9126. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra00466a10.1039/c9ra00466a ↗