From agaric hydrogel to nitrogen-doped 3D porous carbon for high-performance Li–S batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Reproducible massive biochar with low cost has attracted great attentions due to their potential applications in the future environment and energy. In this work, a nitrogen-doped 3D porous agaric carbon (N-AC) with high specific surface area (1568.2 m2 g−1) was fabricated without adding any activator by using the agaric hydrogel as a precursor. And when employed as a sulfur host, the resulted N-AC–sulfur composite electrode with 60 wt% sulfur content illustrates a high reversible capacity of 875 mAh g−1 at 0.2 C (1 C = 1675 mA g−1) over 100 cycles as well as an excellent rate capability of 620 mAh g−1 at 2 C. Such excellent electrochemical performances could attribute to (1) the conductive carbon skeleton of N-AC that provides rapid electron/ion transfer; (2) abundant pores range from micropores to macropores in N-AC that are beneficial to accommodating the active sulfur and polysulfides and (3) the nitrogen dopants that provide polarized sites in chemical binding of polysulfides. In a word, this work provides a compelling avenue to the design of multifunctional sulfur host for advanced Li–S batteries.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Bruce PG, Freunberger SA, Hardwick LJ, Tarascon JM (2011) Li–O2 and Li–S batteries with high energy storage. Nat Mater 11:19–2910.1038/nmat3191 ↗
2. Younesi R, Veith GM, Johansson P, Edström K, Vegge T (2015) Lithium salts for advanced lithium batteries: Li–metal, Li–O2, and Li–S. Energy Environ Sci 8:1905–192210.1039/C5EE01215E ↗
3. Dai H, Xi K, Liu X, Lai C, Zhang S (2018) Cationic surfactant-based electrolyte additives for uniform lithium deposition via lithiophobic repulsion mechanisms. J Am Chem Soc 140:17515–1752110.1021/jacs.8b08963 ↗
4. Li C, Li J, Zhang Y, Cui X, Lei H, Li G (2019) Heteroatom-doped hierarchically porous carbons derived from cucumber stem as high-performance anodes for sodium-ion batteries. J Mater Sci 54:5641–5657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-03229-210.1007/s10853-018-03229-2 ↗
5. Gu X, Lai C (2019) One dimensional nanostructures contribute better Li–S and Li–Se batteries: progress, challenges and perspectives. Energy Storage Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.05.01310.1016/j.ensm.2019.05.013 ↗
6. Gu X, Tang T, Liu X, Hou Y (2019) Rechargeable metal batteries based on selenium cathodes: progress, challenges and perspectives. J Mater Chem A 7:11566–1158310.1039/C8TA12537F ↗
7. Yang Y, Zheng G, Cui Y (2013) Nanostructured sulfur cathodes. Chem Soc Rev 42:3018–303210.1039/c2cs35256g ↗
8. Walle MD, Zhang Z, Zhang M, You X, Li Y, Liu YN (2018) Hierarchical 3D nitrogen and phosphorous codoped graphene/carbon nanotubes–sulfur composite with synergistic effect for high performance of lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Sci 53:2685–2696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1678-110.1007/s10853-017-1678-1 ↗
9. Duan L, Zhao L, Cong H, Zhang X, Lu W, Xue C (2019) Plasma treatment for nitrogen-doped 3D graphene framework by a conductive matrix with sulfur for high-performance Li–S batteries. Small 15:1804347–180435410.1002/smll.201804347 ↗
10. Ji X, Lee KT, Nazar LF (2009) A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries. Nat Mater 8:500–50610.1038/nmat2460 ↗
11. Liang S, Liang C, Xia Y et al (2016) Facile synthesis of porous Li2S@C composites as cathode materials for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Power Sources 306:200–20710.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.030 ↗
12. Cheng XB, Huang JQ, Zhang Q, Peng HJ, Zhao MQ, Wei F (2014) Aligned carbon nanotube/sulfur composite cathodes with high sulfur content for lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano Energy 4:65–7210.1016/j.nanoen.2013.12.013 ↗
13. Zhang C, Wu HB, Yuan C, Guo Z, Lou XWD (2012) Confining sulfur in double-shelled hollow carbon spheres for lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 124:9730–973310.1002/ange.201205292 ↗
14. Zhou G, Li L, Ma C et al (2015) A graphene foam electrode with high sulfur loading for flexible and high energy Li–S batteries. Nano Energy 11:356–36510.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.025 ↗
15. Zhang J, Cai Y, Zhong Q, Lai D, Yao J (2015) Porous nitrogen-doped carbon derived from silk fibroin protein encapsulating sulfur as a superior cathode material for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Nanoscale 7:17791–1779710.1039/C5NR04768D ↗
16. Song RS, Wang B, Ruan TT et al (2018) A three-dimensional cathode matrix with bi-confinement effect of polysulfide for lithium–sulfur battery. Appl Surf Sci 472:396–40410.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.013 ↗
17. Gu X, Xin L, Li Y, Dong F, Fu M, Hou Y (2018) Highly reversible Li–Se batteries with ultra-lightweight N, S-codoped graphene blocking layer. Nano-Micro Lett 10:59–6810.1007/s40820-018-0213-5 ↗
18. Gu X, Wang Y, Lai C et al (2015) Microporous bamboo biochar for lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano Res 8:129–13910.1007/s12274-014-0601-1 ↗
19. Yang K, Gao Q, Tan Y et al (2016) Biomass-derived porous carbon with micropores and small mesopores for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem Eur J 22:3239–324410.1002/chem.201504672 ↗
20. Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Konarov A, Li Z, Chen P (2015) Effect of mesoporous carbon microtube prepared by carbonizing the poplar catkin on sulfur cathode performance in Li/S batteries. J Alloys Compd 619:298–30210.1016/j.jallcom.2014.09.055 ↗
21. Zhao S, Li C, Wang W et al (2013) A novel porous nanocomposite of sulfur/carbon obtained from fish scales for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 1:3334–333910.1039/c3ta01220d ↗
22. Yao H, Zheng G, Li W et al (2013) Crab shells as sustainable templates from nature for nanostructured battery electrodes. Nano Lett 13:3385–339010.1021/nl401729r ↗
23. Wei S, Zhang H, Huang Y, Wang W, Xia Y, Yu Z (2011) Pig bone derived hierarchical porous carbon and its enhanced cycling performance of lithium–sulfur batteries. Energy Environ Sci 4:736–74010.1039/c0ee00505c ↗
24. Yuan H, Liu T, Liu Y et al (2019) A review of biomass materials for advanced lithium–sulfur batteries. Chem Sci 10:7484–749510.1039/C9SC02743B ↗
25. Gu X, Lai C, Liu F, Yang W, Hou Y, Zhang S (2015) A conductive interwoven bamboo carbon fiber membrane for Li–S batteries. J Mater Chem A 3:9502–950910.1039/C5TA00681C ↗
26. Zhao Q, Zhu Q, An Y et al (2018) A 3D conductive carbon interlayer with ultrahigh adsorption capability for lithium-suflur batteries. Appl Surf Sci 440:770–77710.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.162 ↗
27. Li D, Chang G, Zong L et al (2019) From double-helix structured seaweed to S-doped carbon aerogel with ultra-high surface area for energy storage. Energy Storage Mater 17:22–3010.1016/j.ensm.2018.08.004 ↗
28. Zhu Z, Liu Y, Ju Z et al (2019) Synthesis of diverse green carbon nanomaterials through fully utilizing biomass carbon source assisted by KOH. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:24205–2421110.1021/acsami.9b08420 ↗
29. Ma J, Qiao Z, Xiang X (2011) Optimisation of extraction procedure for black fungus polysaccharides and effect of the polysaccharides on blood lipid and myocardium antioxidant enzymes activities. Carbohydr Polym 84:1061–106810.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.068 ↗
30. Zhu X, Xu Y, Li D, Zhao N, Gong J (2018) Correlation of the antioxidant activity and of polysaccharides from auricularia auricula with its molecular weight and extracting agent properties. Mod Food Sci Technol 34:59–67
31. Gu X, Tong CJ, Rehman S, Liu LM, Hou Y, Zhang S (2016) Multifunctional nitrogen-doped loofah sponge carbon blocking layer for high-performance rechargeable lithium batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:15991–1600110.1021/acsami.6b02378 ↗
32. Gu X, Tong CJ, Lai C et al (2015) Porous nitrogen and phosphorous dual doped graphene blocking layer for high performance Li–S batteries. J Mater Chem A 3:16670–1667810.1039/C5TA04255K ↗
33. Lai C, Wu Z, Gu X et al (2015) Reinforced conductive confinement of sulfur for robust and high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:23885–2389210.1021/acsami.5b07978 ↗
34. Liang C, Liang S, Xia Y et al (2017) H2O-induced self-propagating synthesis of hierarchical porous carbon: a promising lithium storage material with superior rate capability and ultra-long cycling life. J Mater Chem A 5:18221–1822910.1039/C7TA05064J ↗
35. Liang C, Liang S, Xia Y et al (2018) Synthesis of hierarchical porous carbon from metal carbonates towards high-performance lithium storage. Green Chem 20:1484–149010.1039/C7GC02841E ↗
36. Hencz L, Gu X, Zhou X, Martens W, Zhang S (2017) Highly porous nitrogen-doped seaweed carbon for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Sci 52:12336–12347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1288-y10.1007/s10853-017-1288-y ↗
37. Zhong Y, Chao D, Deng S et al (2018) Confining sulfur in integrated composite scaffold with highly porous carbon fibers/vanadium nitride arrays for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Funct Mater 28:1706391–170639910.1002/adfm.201706391 ↗
38. Peng HJ, Xu WT, Zhu L et al (2016) 3D carbonaceous current collectors: the origin of enhanced cycling stability for high-sulfur-loading lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Funct Mater 26:6351–635810.1002/adfm.201602071 ↗
39. Rehman S, Gu X, Khan K et al (2016) 3D vertically aligned and interconnected porous carbon nanosheets as sulfur immobilizers for high performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater 6:150251810.1002/aenm.201502518 ↗
40. Li GR, Ling M, Ye YF et al (2015) Acacia senegal-inspired bifunctional binder for longevity of lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater 5:1500878–150088510.1002/aenm.201500878 ↗
41. Huang M, Yang J, Xi B et al (2018) Enhancing kinetics of Li–S batteries by graphene-like N, S-codoped biochar fabricated in NaCl non-aqueous ionic liquid. Sci China Mater 62:455–46410.1007/s40843-018-9331-x ↗
42. Pang Q, Tang J, Huang H et al (2015) A nitrogen and sulfur dual-doped carbon derived from polyrhodanine@cellulose for advanced lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Mater 27:6021–602810.1002/adma.201502467 ↗
43. Liu QC, Xu JJ, Xu D, Zhang XB (2015) Flexible lithium–oxygen battery based on a recoverable cathode. Nat Commun 6:7892–789910.1038/ncomms8892 ↗
44. Liao F, Światowska J, Maurice V et al (2014) Ageing mechanisms of conversion-type electrode material studied on iron sulfide thin films. Electrochim Acta 120:359–36810.1016/j.electacta.2013.12.058 ↗
45. Eshetu GG, Judez X, Li C et al (2017) Lithium azide as an electrolyte additive for all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 56:15368–1537210.1002/anie.201709305 ↗
46. Sun Y, Li Y, Sun J, Li Y, Pei A, Cui Y (2017) Stabilized Li3N for efficient battery cathode prelithiation. Energy Storage Mater 6:119–12410.1016/j.ensm.2016.10.004 ↗
47. Ma JL, Bao D, Shi M-M, Yan JM, Zhang XB (2017) Reversible nitrogen fixation based on a rechargeable lithium–nitrogen battery for energy storage. Chem 2:525–53210.1016/j.chempr.2017.03.016 ↗
48. Pei F, Lin L, Fu A et al (2018) A two-dimensional porous carbon-modified separator for high-energy-density Li–S batteries. Joule 2:323–33610.1016/j.joule.2017.12.003 ↗