In situ characterization of Cu–Fe–O x catalyst for water–gas shift reaction
Source abstract
Abstract
Cu–Fe–O catalyst consisting of α-Fe2O3 with supported CuO nanoparticles was prepared through co-precipitation. Integrated analyses of surface and bulk of the catalyst particles showed that it consists of α-Fe2O3 with supported CuO nanoparticles. The supported CuO can be reduced to metallic Cu at a temperature of 100–150 °C with a following transformation of α-Fe2O3 to Fe3O4 at a temperature of 150–200 °C. The composition of Cu/Fe3O4 was identified by in situ X-ray diffraction, high-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscope and ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectrometer. The formed Cu/Fe3O4 exhibits high activity for water–gas shift reaction in the temperature range of 180–250 °C. Activation barrier of WGS on Cu/Fe3O4 is lower than Cu/Al2O3 by 10–15 kJ/mol, suggesting that Fe3O4 participates into the WGS in the low-temperature range. Ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies show that the active surface phase during WGS consists of metallic Cu nanoparticles and Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Ertl G, Knözinger H, Weitkamp J (eds) (1997) Handbook of heterogeneous catalysis, vol 4. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 1831–184310.1002/9783527619474 ↗
2. Liu Y, Fu Q, Stephanopoulos MF (2004) Preferential oxidation of CO in H2 over CuO–CeO2 catalysts. Catal Today 93–95:241–24610.1016/j.cattod.2004.06.049 ↗
3. Ridler DE, Lloyd L, Twigg MV (1989) The water-gas shift reaction. In: Twigg MV (ed) Catalyst handbook, 2nd edn. Wolfe Publishing Ltd., London, pp 283–292
4. Kam R, Selomulya C, Amal R, Scott J (2010) The influence of La-doping on the activity and stability of Cu/ZnO catalyst for the low-temperature water–gas shift reaction. J Catal 273:73–8110.1016/j.jcat.2010.05.004 ↗
5. Campbell CT, Daube KA (1987) A surface science investigation of the water–gas shift reaction on Cu (111). J Catal 104:109–11910.1016/0021-9517(87)90341-1 ↗
6. Elliott AJ, Hadden RA, Tabatabaei J, Waugh KC, Zemicael FW (1995) Inverted temperature dependence of the decomposition of carbon dioxide on oxide-supported polycrystalline copper. J Catal 157:153–16110.1006/jcat.1995.1276 ↗
7. Gunawardana PVDS, Lee HC, Kim DH (2009) Performance of copper–ceria catalysts for water gas shift reaction in medium temperature range. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:1336–134110.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.041 ↗
8. Rodríguez JA, Liu P, Hrbek J, Pérez M, Evans J (2008) Water–gas shift activity of Au and Cu nanoparticles supported on molybdenum oxides. J Mol Catal A Chem 281:59–6510.1016/j.molcata.2007.07.032 ↗
9. Newsome DS (1980) The water–gas shift reaction. Catal Rev 21:275–31810.1080/03602458008067535 ↗
10. Li L, Song L, Wang H, Chen C, She Y, Zhan Y, Lin X, Zheng Q (2011) Water–gas shift reaction over CuO/CeO2 catalysts: effect of CeO2 supports previously prepared by precipitation with different precipitants. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:8839–884910.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.04.137 ↗
11. Tanaka Y, Utaka T, Kikuchi R, Sasaki K, Eguchi K (2003) CO removal from reformed fuel over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts prepared by impregnation and coprecipitation methods. Appl Catal A Gen 238:11–1810.1016/S0926-860X(02)00095-9 ↗
12. Yahiro H, Sagata K, Yamamoto T, Saiki K, Asamoto M, Yamaura H (2008) Promotion effect of FeOx addition on the catalytic activity of supported Cu catalysts for the water–gas shift reaction. Catal Lett 124:233–23710.1007/s10562-008-9504-7 ↗
13. Patterson AL (1939) The Scherrer formula for X-ray particle size determination. Phys Rev 56:978–98210.1103/PhysRev.56.978 ↗
14. Kameoka S, Tanabe T, Tsai AP (2010) Self-assembled porous nano-composite with high catalytic performance by reduction of tetragonal spinel CuFe2O4. Appl Catal A Gen 375:163–17110.1016/j.apcata.2009.12.035 ↗
15. Lin X, Zhang Y, Yin L, Chen C, Zhan Y, Li D (2014) Characterization and catalytic performance of copper-based WGS catalysts derived from copper ferrite. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39:6424–643210.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.02.018 ↗
16. Sun C, Zhu J, Lv Y, Qi L, Liu B, Gao F, Sun K, Dong L, Chen Y (2011) Dispersion, reduction and catalytic performance of CuO supported on ZrO2-doped TiO2 for NO removal by CO. Appl Catal B 103:206–22010.1016/j.apcatb.2011.01.028 ↗
17. Gervasini A, Bennici S (2005) Dispersion and surface states of copper catalysts by temperature-programmed-reduction of oxidized surfaces (s-TPR). Appl Catal A Gen 281:199–20510.1016/j.apcata.2004.11.030 ↗
18. Sato S, Takahashi R, Sodesawa T, Yuma K-I, Obata Y (2000) Distinction between surface and bulk oxidation of Cu through N2O decomposition. J Catal 196:195–19910.1006/jcat.2000.3028 ↗
19. Guerreiro ED, Gorriz OF, Larsen G, Arrúa LA (2000) Cu/SiO2 catalysts for methanol to methyl formate dehydrogenation: a comparative study using different preparation techniques. Appl Catal A Gen 204:33–4810.1016/S0926-860X(00)00507-X ↗
20. Biesinger MC, Payne BP, Grosvenor AP, Lau LWM, Gerson AR, Smart RSC (2011) Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl Surf Sci 257:2717–273010.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.051 ↗
21. van Wijk R, Görts PC, Mens AJM, Gijzeman OLJ, Habraken FHPM, Geus JW (1995) XPS/NRA investigations of particle size effects during the oxidation of Cu particles supported on oxidised Si (100). Appl Surf Sci 90:261–26910.1016/0169-4332(95)00174-3 ↗
22. Ovesen CV, Clausen BS, Hammershøi BS, Steffensen G, Askgaard T, Chorkendorff I, Nørskov JK, Rasmussen PB, Stoltze P, Taylor P (1996) A microkinetic analysis of the water–gas shift reaction under industrial conditions. J Catal 158:170–18010.1006/jcat.1996.0016 ↗
23. Koryabkina NA, Phatak AA, Ruettinger WF, Farrauto RJ, Ribeiro FH (2003) Determination of kinetic parameters for the water–gas shift reaction on copper catalysts under realistic conditions for fuel cell applications. J Catal 217:233–239
24. Grenoble DC, Estadt MM, Ollis DF (1981) The chemistry and catalysis of the water gas shift reaction. J Catal 67:90–10210.1016/0021-9517(81)90263-3 ↗
25. Konsolakis M (2016) ChemInform abstract: the role of copper–ceria interactions in catalysis science: recent theoretical and experimental advances. Appl Catal B 47:49–6610.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.037 ↗