Silica nanostructured platform for affinity capture of tumor-derived exosomes
Source abstract
Abstract
Early diagnosis of prostate cancer and evaluation of appropriate treatment options requires development of effective and high-throughput selective capture technology for exosomes that are positive for the expression of enzyme-biomarker, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). Exosomes are small secreted vesicles that play a key role in intercellular communication and cancer progression. PSMA is highly enriched in exosomes excreted by PSMA+ prostate cancer cells. Using PSMA+ cells from the well-established prostate cancer cell line (LNCaP), the secreted exosomes were collected and isolated from the culture medium. The tumor-derived exosomes were selectively captured using a novel silica nanostructure support that had been functionalized with the small-molecule ligand TG97, a known inhibitor of PSMA enzymatic activity that binds irreversibly in the active site of PSMA. The concept was demonstrated using a single cancer type (i.e., prostate cancer), but based on the data obtained the approach may be applicable to a broad panel of biomarker ligands for selective capture of biomarker-positive exosomes from an array of cell types. The approach demonstrated herein overcomes many of the limitations of alternative methods that are often ineffective in isolating tumor-derived exosomes from those derived from normal tissue because of the low yield recovery and the time required for the process. A further advantage is the ability to isolate a specific subpopulation of exosomes relying on the expression of a specific surface marker as well as improved exosome recovery rate.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Extracellular vesicles in disease · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery · Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Azmi AS, Bao B, Sarkar FH (2013) Exosomes in cancer development, metastasis and drug resistance: a comprehensive review. Cancer Metastasis Rev. doi: 10.1007/s10555-013-9441-910.1007/s10555-013-9441-9 ↗
2. Van Niel G et al (2001) Intestinal epithelial cells secrete exosome-like vesicles. Gastroenterology 121(2):337–34910.1053/gast.2001.26263 ↗
3. Logozzi M et al (2009) High levels of exosomes expressing CD63 and Caveolin-1 in plasma of melanoma patients. PLoS ONE 4(4):e521910.1371/journal.pone.0005219 ↗
4. Pisitkun T, Shen R-F, Knepper MA (2004) Identification and proteomic profiling of exosomes in human urine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(36):13368–1337310.1073/pnas.0403453101 ↗
5. Michael A et al (2010) Exosomes from human saliva as a source of microRNA biomarkers. Oral Dis 16(1):34–3810.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01604.x ↗
6. Keller S et al (2007) CD24 is a marker of exosomes secreted into urine and amniotic fluid. Kidney Int 72(9):1095–110210.1038/sj.ki.5002486 ↗
7. Andre F et al (2002) Malignant effusions and immunogenic tumour-derived exosomes. The Lancet 360(9329):295–30510.1016/S0140-6736(02)09552-1 ↗
8. Xiao D et al (2012) Identifying mRNA, MicroRNA and protein profiles of melanoma exosomes. PLoS ONE 7(10):e4687410.1371/journal.pone.0046874 ↗
9. Sceneay J, Smyth M, Möller A (2013) The pre-metastatic niche: finding common ground. Cancer Metastasis Rev 32(3–4):449–46410.1007/s10555-013-9420-1 ↗
10. Liu T, Mendes DE, Berkman CE (2014) Functional prostate-specific membrane antigen is enriched in exosomes from prostate cancer cells. Int J Oncol 44(3):918–92210.3892/ijo.2014.2256 ↗
11. Momen-Heravi F et al (2013) Current methods for the isolation of extracellular vesicles. Biol Chem 394:125310.1515/hsz-2013-0141 ↗
12. Kanwar SS et al (2014) Microfluidic device (ExoChip) for on-chip isolation, quantification and characterization of circulating exosomes. Lab Chip 14(11):1891–190010.1039/C4LC00136B ↗
13. Chen C et al (2010) Microfluidic isolation and transcriptome analysis of serum microvesicles. Lab Chip 10(4):505–51110.1039/B916199F ↗
14. Wang Z et al (2013) Ciliated micropillars for the microfluidic-based isolation of nanoscale lipid vesicles. Lab Chip 13(15):2879–288210.1039/c3lc41343h ↗
15. Davies RT et al (2012) Microfluidic filtration system to isolate extracellular vesicles from blood. Lab Chip 12(24):5202–521010.1039/c2lc41006k ↗
16. Im H et al (2014) Label-free detection and molecular profiling of exosomes with a nano-plasmonic sensor. Nat Biotechnol 32(5):490–49510.1038/nbt.2886 ↗
17. Liga A et al (2015) Exosome isolation: a microfluidic road-map. Lab Chip 15(11):2388–239410.1039/C5LC00240K ↗
18. Ko J, Carpenter E, Issadore D (2016) Detection and isolation of circulating exosomes and microvesicles for cancer monitoring and diagnostics using micro-/nano-based devices. Analyst 141(2):450–46010.1039/C5AN01610J ↗
19. Fu H et al (2012) Threonine aldolase immobilization on different supports for engineering of productive, cost-efficient enzymatic microreactors. Chem Eng J 207–208:564–57610.1016/j.cej.2012.07.017 ↗
20. Pondman KM et al (2015) Magnetic drug delivery with FePd nanowires. J Magn Magn Mater 380:299–30610.1016/j.jmmm.2014.10.101 ↗
21. Lee J-H et al (2016) Spontaneous internalization of cell penetrating peptide-modified nanowires into primary neurons. Nano Lett 16(2):1509–151310.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00020 ↗
22. Schilke KF et al (2010) A novel enzymatic microreactor with Aspergillus oryzae β-galactosidase immobilized on silicon dioxide nanosprings. Biotechnol Prog 26(6):1597–160510.1002/btpr.476 ↗
23. McIlroy DN et al (2004) Nanospring formation—unexpected catalyst mediated growth. J Phys Condens Matter 16(12):R41510.1088/0953-8984/16/12/R02 ↗
24. McIlroy DN et al (2001) Nanosprings. Appl Phys Lett 79(10):1540–154210.1063/1.1400079 ↗
25. Lidong W et al (2006) High yield synthesis and lithography of silica-based nanospring mats. Nanotechnology 17(11):S29810.1088/0957-4484/17/11/S12 ↗
26. Ganguly T et al (2015) A high-affinity [18F]-labeled phosphoramidate peptidomimetic PSMA-targeted inhibitor for PET imaging of prostate cancer. Nuclear Med Biol 42(10):780–78710.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.06.003 ↗
27. Tremblay M-È, Riad M, Majewska AK (2010) Preparation of mouse brain tissue for immunoelectron microscopy. J Vis Exp JoVE 41:2021
28. Yang Z et al (2008) Streptavidin-functionalized three-dimensional ordered nanoporous silica film for highly efficient chemiluminescent immunosensing. Adv Funct Mater 18(24):3991–399810.1002/adfm.200801022 ↗
29. Zhao J et al (2015) Super-hydrophobic surfaces of SiO2-coated SiC nanowires: fabrication, mechanism and ultraviolet-durable super-hydrophobicity. J Colloid Interface Sci 444:33–3710.1016/j.jcis.2014.12.057 ↗
30. Cassie ABD, Baxter S (1944) Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 40:546–55110.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
31. Daoud WA, Xin JH, Tao X (2004) Superhydrophobic silica nanocomposite coating by a low-temperature process. J Am Ceram Soc 87(9):1782–178410.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.01782.x ↗
32. Daoud WA, Xin JH, Tao X (2006) Synthesis and characterization of hydrophobic silica nanocomposites. Appl Surf Sci 252(15):5368–537110.1016/j.apsusc.2005.12.020 ↗
33. Slack JK et al (2001) Alterations in the focal adhesion kinase/Src signal transduction pathway correlate with increased migratory capacity of prostate carcinoma cells. Oncogene 20(10):1152–116310.1038/sj.onc.1204208 ↗
34. Zomer A et al (2010) Exosomes: fit to deliver small RNA. Commun Integr Biol 3(5):447–45010.4161/cib.3.5.12339 ↗
35. Conde-Vancells J et al (2008) Characterization and comprehensive proteome profiling of exosomes secreted by hepatocytes. J Proteome Res 7(12):5157–516610.1021/pr8004887 ↗
36. Raposo G, Stoorvogel W (2013) Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J Cell Biol 200(4):373–38310.1083/jcb.201211138 ↗
37. Raposo G et al (1996) B lymphocytes secrete antigen-presenting vesicles. J Exp Med 183(3):1161–117210.1084/jem.183.3.1161 ↗