Microstructure and properties of metakaolin-based inorganic polymer foams
Source abstract
Abstract
A mixture of 70 % metakaolin and 30 % blast furnace slag powders, employed as the raw material, is mixed with different alkaline activating solutions in the production of metakaolin-based inorganic polymer foams (MIPF) with various densities ranging from 0.4 to 1.0 g/cm3 using a mechanical foaming process. The microstructures of metakaolin and slag powders, inorganic binder, and MIPF specimens are characterized by using XRD, FTIR, and image analyses. The effects of stirring time, water/binder ratio, and foaming agent on the properties of inorganic binders are also evaluated. Moreover, the pore size distributions, thermal and mechanical properties of the MIPF specimens are obtained by conducting a series of measurements and then compared with each other. Based on the experimental results, it is found that the measured cell length, cell wall thickness, compressive strength, flexural strength, and coefficient of thermal conductivity of the MIPF specimens are significantly affected by their densities.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Tonyan TD, Gibson LJ (1992) J Mater Sci 27:6371. doi: 10.1007/BF0057628710.1007/BF00576287 ↗
2. Huang JS, Huang ZH (2000) J Mater Sci 35:4385. doi: 10.1023/A:100481322504510.1023/A:1004813225045 ↗
3. Huang JS, Liu KD (2001) J Mater Sci 36:771. doi: 10.1023/A:100481373028210.1023/A:1004813730282 ↗
4. Narayanan N, Ramamurthy K (2000) Cem Concr Compos 22:32110.1016/S0958-9465(00)00016-0 ↗
5. Davidovits J (1993) Ceram Trans 37:165
6. Mehta PK (2001) Concr Int 23:61
7. Davidovits J (1989) J Therm Anal 35:42910.1007/BF01904446 ↗
8. Roy DM (1999) Cem Concr Res 29:24910.1016/S0008-8846(98)00093-3 ↗
9. Phair JW, van Deventer JSJ, Smith JD (2004) Appl Geochem 19:42310.1016/S0883-2927(03)00151-3 ↗
10. Xu H, van Deventer JSJ (2000) Int J Miner Process 59:24710.1016/S0301-7516(99)00074-5 ↗
11. Perera DS, Aly Z, Vance ER, Mizumo M (2005) J Am Ceram Soc 88:258610.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00438.x ↗
12. Bakharev T (2005) Cem Concr Res 35:65810.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.005 ↗
13. Davidovits J (1994) J Mater Education 16:91
14. Davidovits J, Davidovits R, James C (1999) Proceeding of Geopolymer 99 Second International Conference, pp 9–37
15. Yip CK, Lukey GC, van Deventer JSJ (2005) Cem Concr Res 35:168810.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.042 ↗
16. Yip CK, Lukey GC, Provis JL, van Deventer JSJ (2008) Cem Concr Res 38:55410.1016/j.cemconres.2007.11.001 ↗
17. Davidovits J (1985) U.S. Patent 4509985
18. Davidovits J (1994) U.S. Patent 5349118
19. Esmaily H, Nuranian H (2012) Constr Build Mater 26:20010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.010 ↗
20. Arellano Aguilar R, BurciagaDiaz O, Escalanta Garcia JI (2010) Constr Build Mater 24:116610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.024 ↗
21. Valer FF, Kenneth JD, Clelio T (2000) Int J Inorg Mater 2:30910.1016/S1466-6049(00)00041-6 ↗
22. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular Solids: Structures & Properties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
23. Hashin Z, Shtrikman S (1962) J Appl Phys 33:312510.1063/1.1728579 ↗