journal article·2014-11

Effects of particle size and properties on the microstructures, mechanical properties, and fracture mechanisms of 7075Al hybrid composites prepared by squeeze casting

Yixiong Liu, Chao Yang, Weiping Chen, Dezhi Zhu, Yuanyuan Li

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 49· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

To investigate the effects of particle size and properties on the mechanical properties of 7075Al matrix composites, hybrid composites reinforced using three different reinforcement combinations, 40 vol. % 7 μm SiCp with 5 vol. % 7 μm SiCp, 35 μm SiCp, and 35 μm Ti, were prepared using squeeze casting. The failure mechanisms and the microstructure–property relationships of hybrid composites were studied using SEM, TEM, and tensile tests. The composite containing Ti particles achieved the highest tensile strength of 626 MPa and an elongation of 1.2 %. Fracture mechanism analyses imply that the reduced strength for the 35 μm SiCp-containing composite are caused by the inefficient load transfer capability resulting from the preferential breakage of larger-sized SiCp particles during the deformation process. In contrast, micro-zones formed by Ti particles at the center and matrix alloy with few dislocations around release stress and deform synergistically during deformation, which decreases the breakage of SiCp and improves the plastic deformation ability of the matrix alloy, resulting in a good combination of strength and ductility.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Kelly A, Zweben CH (2000) Comprehensive composite materials. Elsevier, Amsterdam
2. Xue C, Yu JK (2014) Enhanced thermal transfer and bending strength of SiC/Al composite with controlled interfacial reaction. Mater Des 53:74–7810.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.056 ↗
3. Yang M, Xu CY, Wu CS et al (2010) Fabrication of AA6061/Al2O3 nano ceramic particle reinforced composite coating by using friction stir processing. J Mater Sci 45:4431–443810.1007/s10853-010-4525-1 ↗
4. Tian SF, Jiang LT, Guo Q et al (2014) Effect of surface roughness on tribological properties of TiB2/Al composites. Mater Des 53:129–13610.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.038 ↗
5. Lai J, Zhang Z, Chen XG (2013) Precipitation strengthening of Al-B4C metal matrix composites alloyed with Sc and Zr. J Alloys Compd 552:227–23510.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.096 ↗
6. Mawsouf NM (2000) A micromechanical mechanism of fracture initiation in discontinuously reinforced metal-matrix composite. Mater Charact 44:321–32710.1016/S1044-5803(99)00068-6 ↗
7. Song M, Xiao D (2008) Modeling the fracture toughness and tensile ductility of SiCp/Al metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A 474:371–37510.1016/j.msea.2007.05.075 ↗
8. Nagendra N, Jayaram V (2000) Fracture and R-curves in high volume fraction Al2O3/Al composites. J Mater Res 15:1131–114410.1557/JMR.2000.0161 ↗
9. Srivatsan TS, Al-Hajri M, Smith C et al (2003) The tensile response and fracture behavior of 2009 aluminum alloy metal matrix composite. Mater Sci Eng A 346:91–10010.1016/S0921-5093(02)00481-1 ↗
10. Ibrahim IA, Mohamed FA, Lavernia EJ (1991) Particulate reinforced metal matrix composites-a review. J Mater Sci 26:1137–115610.1007/BF00544448 ↗
11. Lee J-C, Ahn J-P, Shim J-H et al (1999) Control of the interface in SiC/Al composites. Scr Mater 41:895–90010.1016/S1359-6462(99)00227-4 ↗
12. Baik KH (2003) Interfacial reaction and fracture behavior of cobalt-coated Al2O3 reinforced aluminum composites. Mater Sci Eng A 355:79–8710.1016/S0921-5093(03)00042-X ↗
13. Saha R, Morris E, Chawla N et al (2002) Hybrid and conventional particle reinforced metal matrix composites by squeeze infiltration casting. J Mater Sci Lett 21:337–33910.1023/A:1017960912030 ↗
14. Ahmadi A, Toroghinejad MR, Najafizadeh A et al (2013) Evaluation of microstructure and mechanical properties of Al/Al2O3/SiC hybrid composite fabricated by accumulative roll bonding process. Mater Des 53:13–1910.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.064 ↗
15. Mahdavi S, Akhlaghi F (2011) Effect of SiC content on the processing, compaction behavior, and properties of Al6061/SiC/Gr hybrid composites. J Mater Res 46:1502–1511
16. Chaudhury Z, Hailat M, Liu Y, Newaz G (2011) Aluminum-based composites reinforced with SiC particles and NiTi fibers: influence of fiber dimensions and aging time on mechanical properties. J Mater Res 46:1945–1955
17. Geng L, Zhang X-N, Wang G-S et al (2006) Effect of aging treatment on mechanical properties of (SiCw + SiCp)/2024Al hybrid nanocomposites. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 16:387–39110.1016/S1003-6326(06)60066-6 ↗
18. Arsenault RJ, Wang L, Feng CR (1991) Strengthening of composites due to microstructural changes in the matrix. Acta Metall Mater 39:47–5710.1016/0956-7151(91)90327-W ↗
19. Brechet Y, Embury JD, Tao S et al (1991) Damage initiation in metal matrix composites. Acta Metall Mater 39:1781–178610.1016/0956-7151(91)90146-R ↗
20. Corbin SF, Wilkinson DS (1994) The influence of particle distribution on the mechanical response of a particulate metal matrix composite. Acta Metall Mater 42:1311–131810.1016/0956-7151(94)90147-3 ↗
21. Hunt WH, Brockenbrough JR, Magnusen PE (1991) An Al-Si-Mg composite model system: microstructural effects on deformation and damage evolution. Scr Metall Mater 25:15–2010.1016/0956-716X(91)90346-3 ↗
22. Lewandowski JJ, Liu C, Hunt WH Jr (1989) Effects of matrix microstructure and particle distribution on fracture of an aluminum metal matrix composite. Mater Sci Eng A 107:241–25510.1016/0921-5093(89)90392-4 ↗
23. Lloyd DJ (1991) Aspects of fracture in particulate reinforced metal matrix composites. Acta Metall Mater 39:59–7110.1016/0956-7151(91)90328-X ↗
24. Manoharan M, Lewandowski JJ (1992) Effect of reinforcement size and matrix microstructure on the fracture properties of an aluminum metal matrix composite. Mater Sci Eng A 150:179–18610.1016/0921-5093(92)90110-M ↗
25. Mummery P, Derby B (1991) The influence of microstructure on the fracture behaviour of particulate metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A 135:221–22410.1016/0921-5093(91)90566-6 ↗
26. You CP, Thompson AW, Bernstein IM (1987) Proposed failure mechanism in a discontinuously reinforced aluminum alloy. Scr Mater 21:181–185
27. Hossein-Zadeh M, Mirzaee O, Saidi P (2014) Structural and mechanical characterization of Al-based composite reinforced with heat treated Al2O3 particles. Mater Des 54:245–25010.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.036 ↗
28. El-Kady O, Fathy A (2014) Effect of SiC particle size on the physical and mechanical properties of extruded Al matrix nanocomposites. Mater Des 54:348–35310.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.049 ↗
29. Chawla N, Ganesh VV (2010) Fatigue crack growth of SiC particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Int J Fatigue 32:856–86310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.08.005 ↗
30. Pandey AB, Majumdar BS, Miracle DB (1999) Effect of aluminum particles on the fracture toughness of a 7093/SiC/15p composite. Mater Sci Eng A 259:296–30710.1016/S0921-5093(98)00901-0 ↗
31. Yadav D, Bauri R (2010) Nickel particle embedded aluminium matrix composite with high ductility. Mater Lett 64:664–66710.1016/j.matlet.2009.12.030 ↗
32. Jang JSC, Li JB, Lee SL et al (2012) Prominent plasticity of Mg-based bulk metallic glass composites by ex situ spherical Ti particles. Intermetallics 30:25–2910.1016/j.intermet.2012.03.038 ↗
33. Zhu Z, Zhang H, Hu Z et al (2010) Ta-particulate reinforced Zr-based bulk metallic glass matrix composite with tensile plasticity. Scr Mater 62:278–28110.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.11.018 ↗
34. Leyens C, Peters M (2003) Titanium and titanium alloys. Wiley, Weinheim10.1002/3527602119 ↗
35. Longtao J, Min Z, Gaohui W et al (2005) Aging behavior of sub-micron Al2O3P/2024Al composites. Mater Sci Eng A 392:366–37210.1016/j.msea.2004.09.048 ↗
36. Zhang Q, Wu GH, Chen GQ et al (2003) The thermal expansion and mechanical properties of high reinforcement content SiCp/Al composites fabricated by squeeze casting technology. Compos A 34:1023–102710.1016/S1359-835X(03)00253-7 ↗
37. Arsenault RJ, Shi N (1986) Dislocation generation due to differences between the coefficients of thermal expansion. Mater Sci Eng 81:175–18710.1016/0025-5416(86)90261-2 ↗
38. Bitzek E, Gumbsch P (2013) Mechanisms of dislocation multiplication at crack tips. Acta Mater 61:1394–140310.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.016 ↗
39. Hull D, Bacon DJ (2011) Introduction to dislocations. Elsevier, Amsterdam
40. Ayyar A, Chawla N (2007) Microstructure-based modeling of the influence of particle spatial distribution and fracture on crack growth in particle-reinforced composites. Acta Mater 55:6064–607310.1016/j.actamat.2007.06.044 ↗
41. Nan CW, Clarke DR (1996) The influence of particle size and particle fracture on the elastic/plastic deformation of metal matrix composites. Acta Mater 44:3801–381110.1016/1359-6454(96)00008-0 ↗
42. Lloyd DJ (1994) Particle reinforced aluminium and magnesium matrix composites. Int Mater Rev 39:1–2310.1179/imr.1994.39.1.1 ↗
43. Totten GE, MacKenzie DS (2003) Handbook of aluminum: physical metallurgy and processes, vol 1. Marcel Dekker, New York
44. Doel TJA, Bowen P (1996) Tensile properties of particulate-reinforced metal matrix composites. Compos A 27:655–66510.1016/1359-835X(96)00040-1 ↗
45. Wang W, Lian J, Ru H (2012) Pressureless sintered SiC matrix toughened by in situ synthesized TiB2: Process conditions and fracture toughness. Ceram Int 38:2079–208510.1016/j.ceramint.2011.10.045 ↗
46. Kainer KU (2006) Metal matrix composites. Custom-made materials for automotive and aerospace engineering. Wiley, Weinheim10.1002/3527608117 ↗