journal article·2010-05

Effect of particle size in Ni screen printing paste of incompatible polymer binders

J. H. Sung, J. Y. Lee, S. Kim, J. Suh, J. Kim, K. H. Ahn, S. J. Lee

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 45· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Dispersion of nano-sized particles at high solid content has attracted attention in many industrial applications such as printed electronic products. However, the material design and processing heavily depends on experience with little quantitative measure. For fabrication of thinner dielectric layers, Ni size is getting smaller when used as an inner electrode in multilayer chip capacitor (MLCC). In the present study, we investigate the rheological properties and printing performance of the pastes with two different sizes of Ni particles in the same incompatible binder mixtures of ethyl cellulose (EC) and polyvinyl butyral (PVB). The difference in particle size causes different microstructural heterogeneity and highly nonlinear rheological properties upon the external flow field. The printing pattern and the surface profile are also analyzed by confocal images after screen printing. For smaller particle size of Ni, the more heterogeneous microstructure is observed with increasing PVB content, which is evidenced by the screen printing images as well as its rheological behavior. We explain the difference of spatial heterogeneity in terms of different interactions between particle–particle and particle–polymer. This work is believed to contribute to better design of inner electrodes and processing in MLCC manufacturing.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Dielectric materials and actuators

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Kishi H, Mizuno Y, Chazono H (2003) Jpn J Appl Phys 42:110.1143/JJAP.42.1 ↗
2. Polotai AV, Fujii I, Shay DP, Yang GY, Dickey EC, Randall CA (2008) J Am Ceram Soc 91:254010.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02517.x ↗
3. Nakano Y, Nomura T, Takenaka T (2003) Jpn J Appl Phys 42:604110.1143/JJAP.42.6041 ↗
4. Tseng WJ, Chen CN (2006) J Mater Sci 41:1213. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-3659-z10.1007/s10853-005-3659-z ↗
5. Scirocco R, Vermant J, Mewis J (2005) J Rheol 49:55110.1122/1.1849185 ↗
6. Nguty TA, Ekere NN (2000) Rheol Acta 39:60910.1007/s003970000117 ↗
7. Lu K, Kessler C (2006) J Mater Sci 41:5613. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0303-510.1007/s10853-006-0303-5 ↗
8. Phair JW (2008) J Am Ceram Soc 91:213010.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02443.x ↗
9. Lee S, Paik U, Yoon SM, Choi JY (2006) J Am Ceram Soc 89:305010.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01192.x ↗
10. Lewis JA, Blackman KA, Ogden AL, Payne JA, Francis LF (1996) J Am Ceram Soc 79:322510.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08099.x ↗
11. Blackman K, Slilaty RM, Lewis JA (2001) J Am Ceram Soc 84:250110.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb01043.x ↗
12. Renger C, Kuschel P, Kristoffersson A, Clauss B, Oppermann W, Sigmund W (2007) J Eur Ceram Soc 27:236110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.08.022 ↗
13. Thwala JM, Goodwin JW, Mills PD (2008) Langmuir 24:1285810.1021/la8026754 ↗
14. Hong PD, Huang HT, Chou CM (2000) Polym Int 49:40710.1002/(SICI)1097-0126(200004)49:4<407::AID-PI394>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
15. D Ήaene P, Mewis J (1994) Rheol Acta 33:16510.1007/BF00437301 ↗
16. Hutton JF (1975) Rheol Acta 14:97910.1007/BF01516301 ↗
17. Huggins ML (1942) J Am Chem Soc 64:271610.1021/ja01263a056 ↗
18. Mackay ME, Tuteja A, Duxbury PM, Hawker CJ, von Horn B, Guan Z, Chen G, Krishnan RS (2006) Science 311:174010.1126/science.1122225 ↗
19. Horigome M, Otsubo Y (2002) Langmuir 18:196810.1021/la010943p ↗
20. Wu G, Asai S, Sumita M, Yui H (2002) Macromolecules 35:94510.1021/ma0104940 ↗
21. Ginzburg VV (2005) Macromolecules 38:236210.1021/ma0482821 ↗
22. Laradji M (2004) J Chem Phys 120:933010.1063/1.1704636 ↗
23. D’Aguanno B, Wagner NJ (1990) Mat Res Soc Symp Proc 177:21910.1557/PROC-177-219 ↗