journal article·2015-03

Residual stress near single shot peening impingements determined by nanoindentation and numerical simulations

P. Mann, H. Y. Miao, A. Gariépy, M. Lévesque, R. R. Chromik

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 50· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

The near-surface hardness and residual stresses resulting from a single shot peening impingement on aluminum alloy 2024-T351 were assessed by nanoindentation with spatial mapping of mechanical properties on cross sections through an impingement. For residual stress, a procedure was developed to couple nanoindentation experiments with numerical simulations for better understanding and predicting the effects of shot peening. A surface preparation method was developed that exposes the cross section of a single shot impingement for nanoindentation tests, while at the same time obtaining accurate measurements of the impingement dimensions. Starting parameters for the numerical simulation in terms of shot diameter and the shot velocity were selected to best match measurements of the impingement depth and diameter. The experimental results indicated that the greatest hardness was located at the nearest indent to the peened surface, whereas the maximum compressive residual stress was located sub-surface. When comparing experimental and numerical residual stresses, the experimental results showed a greater maximum compressive residual stress that was in closer proximity to the peened surface. Overall, residual stress fields compared between experimental and numerical results were similar, and differences could be explained in terms of the effect of strain hardening. The current work demonstrated the usefulness of coupling nanoindentation experiments with numerical simulations for evaluating the surface modifications resulting from a single shot peening impingement.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Gariépy A, Larose S, Perron C, Lévesque M (2011) Shot peening and peen forming finite element modelling—towards a quantitative method. Int J Solids Struct 48:2859–287710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.06.003 ↗
2. Kim T, Lee H (2008) A 3D FEA model with plastic shots for evaluation of peening residual stress due to multi-impacts. Trans Korean Soc Mech Eng A 32:642–653. doi: 10.3795/ksme-a.2008.32.8.64210.3795/KSME-A.2008.32.8.642 ↗
3. Meguid S, Shagal G, Stranart J (2002) 3D FE analysis of peening of strain-rate sensitive materials using multiple impingement model. Int J Impact Eng 27:119–13410.1016/S0734-743X(01)00043-4 ↗
4. Meguid S, Shagal G, Stranart J, Daly J (1999) Three-dimensional dynamic finite element analysis of shot-peening induced residual stresses. Finite Elem Anal Des 31:179–19110.1016/S0168-874X(98)00057-2 ↗
5. Vöhringer O (1987) In: Proceedings of 3rd conference shot peening (ICSP3), Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
6. Gariépy A, Bridier F, Hoseini M, Bocher P, Perron C, Lévesque M (2013) Experimental and numerical investigation of material heterogeneity in shot peened aluminium alloy AA2024-T351. Surf Coat Technol 219:15–3010.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.12.046 ↗
7. Ebenau A, Vöhringer O, Macherauch E (1987) Influence of the shot peening angle on the condition of near surface layers in materials. In: Proceedings of 3rd conference shot peening (ICSP3), pp. 253–260
8. Braunovic M, Rodrigue L, Gagnon D (2008) In: 54th IEEE Holm conference on electrical contacts, Orlando, FL, United States
9. Arun Prakash N, Gnanamoorthy R, Kamaraj M (2010) Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of oil jet peened aluminium alloy, AA6063-T6. Mater Des 31:4066–4075. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.04.05710.1016/j.matdes.2010.04.057 ↗
10. Thomas M, Jackson M (2012) The role of temperature and alloy chemistry on subsurface deformation mechanisms during shot peening of titanium alloys. Scripta Mater 66:1065–106810.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.02.049 ↗
11. Sidhom N, Laamouri A, Fathallah R, Braham C, Lieurade HP (2005) Fatigue strength improvement of 5083 H11 Al-alloy T-welded joints by shot peening: experimental characterization and predictive approach. Int J Fatigue 27:729–74510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.02.001 ↗
12. Zaroog OS, Ali A, Sahari BB, Zahari R (2011) Modeling of residual stress relaxation of fatigue in 2024-T351 aluminium alloy. Int J Fatigue 33:279–28510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.08.012 ↗
13. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) Improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7:1564–158010.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
14. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (2004) Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J Mater Res 19:3–2010.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
15. Theoretical and numerical analysis (1996) S Carlsson, PL Larsson (2001) On the determination of residual stress and strain fields by sharp indentation testing. Part I. Acta Mater 49:2179–2191
16. Carlsson S, Larsson PL (2001) On the determination of residual stress and strain fields by sharp indentation testing. Part II: Experimental investigation. Acta Mater 49:2193–220310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00123-9 ↗
17. Suresh S, Giannakopoulos AE (1998) A new method for estimating residual stresses by instrumented sharp indentation. Acta Mater 46:5755–576710.1016/S1359-6454(98)00226-2 ↗
18. Lee YH, Kwon D (2004) Estimation of biaxial surface stress by instrumented indentation with sharp indenters. Acta Mater 52:1555–156310.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.006 ↗
19. Jang JI (2009) Estimation of residual stress by instrumented indentation: a review. J Ceram Process Res 10:391–400
20. Larsson P-L (2014) On the determination of biaxial residual stress fields from global indentation quantities. Tribol Lett 54:89–97. doi: 10.1007/s11249-014-0312-510.1007/s11249-014-0312-5 ↗
21. Zhu L, B Xu, Wang H, Wang C (2012) Effect of residual stress on the nanoindentation response of (100) copper single crystal. Mater Chem Phys 136:561–565. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.07.02610.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.07.026 ↗
22. Goldbaum D, Shockley JM, Chromik R et al (2012) The effect of deposition conditions on adhesion strength of Ti and Ti6Al4V cold spray splats. J Therm Spray Technol 21:288–303. doi: 10.1007/s11666-011-9720-310.1007/s11666-011-9720-3 ↗
23. Goldbaum D, Chromik RR, Yue S, Irissou E, Legoux JG (2011) Mechanical property mapping of cold sprayed Ti splats and coatings. J Therm Spray Technol 20:486–49610.1007/s11666-010-9546-4 ↗
24. Miao H, Demers D, Larose S, Perron C, Lévesque M (2010) Experimental study of shot peening and stress peen forming. J Mater Process Technol 210:2089–210210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.07.016 ↗
25. Hong T, Ooi J, Shaw B (2008) A numerical simulation to relate the shot peening parameters to the induced residual stresses. Eng Fail Anal 15:1097–111010.1016/j.engfailanal.2007.11.017 ↗
26. Lefebvre M (2006) Applied probability and statistics. Springer, New York
27. Hirai N, Tosha K, Rouhaud E (2005) In: International Conferences on Shot Peening—9, Paris, France
28. Wang T, Platts MJ, Levers A (2006) A process model for shot peen forming. J Mater Process Technol 172:159–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.09.00610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.09.006 ↗
29. Harada Y, Fukaura K, Haga S (2007) Influence of microshot peening on surface layer characteristics of structural steel. J Mater Process Technol 191:297–30110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.03.026 ↗
30. Wolfhart H (1984) In: Proceedings of 2nd conference shot peening (ICSP2), Chicago, USA
31. Withers PJ, Bhadeshia HKDH (2001) Residual stress part 1—measurement techniques. Mater Sci Technol 17:355–36510.1179/026708301101509980 ↗
32. Genevois C, Fabrègue D, Deschamps A, Poole WJ (2006) On the coupling between precipitation and plastic deformation in relation with friction stir welding of AA2024 T3 aluminium alloy. Mater Sci Eng, A 441:39–4810.1016/j.msea.2006.07.151 ↗
33. Dye D, Stone HJ, Reed RC (2001) Intergranular and interphase microstresses. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 5:31–37. doi: 10.1016/S1359-0286(00)00019-X10.1016/S1359-0286(00)00019-X ↗
34. Frutos E, Multigner M, González-Carrasco JL (2010) Novel approaches to determining residual stresses by ultramicroindentation techniques: application to sandblasted austenitic stainless steel. Acta Mater 58:4191–419810.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.010 ↗
35. Mann P (2014) Mining and materials engineering. McGill University, Montreal
36. Berbenni S, Favier V, Berveiller M (2007) Impact of the grain size distribution on the yield stress of heterogeneous materials. Int J Plast 23:114–142. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.03.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2006.03.004 ↗
37. Guo YB, Xu T, Li M (2012) Atomistic calculation of internal stress in nanoscale polycrystalline materials. Philos Mag 92:3064–3083. doi: 10.1080/14786435.2012.68596310.1080/14786435.2012.685963 ↗
38. Wang YD, Lin Peng R, Wang XL, McGreevy RL (2002) Grain-orientation-dependent residual stress and the effect of annealing in cold-rolled stainless steel. Acta Mater 50:1717–173410.1016/S1359-6454(02)00021-6 ↗