Effect of surface treatment on fatigue behavior of metal/carbon fiber laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
The tension–tension fatigue behavior of metal/fiber laminates (MFLs) has been investigated. These MFLs were produced with carbon fiber and by treating the aluminum foil to promote adhesion bonding by two methods: sulfuric–boric–oxalic acid anodization (SBOA) and chromic acid anodization (CAA). The surface treatments were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques and roughness measurements. It was observed that MFL specimens produced with SBOA treatments presents comparable mechanical results when compared with MFLs produced with CAA treatment. Microstructural observations of the fracture surfaces by SEM show hackle formation is the predominant damage mechanism.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Smart Materials for Construction · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Vlot A, Gunnink JW (2001) Fibre metal laminates. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Delft, the Netherlands10.1007/978-94-010-0995-9 ↗
2. Soprano A, Apicella A, D’Antonio L, Schettino F (1996) Int J Fatigue 18(4):26510.1016/0142-1123(96)00009-6 ↗
3. Botelho EC, Campos AN, Barros E, Pardini LC, Rezende MC (2005) Composites B 37(2–3):25510.1016/j.compositesb.2005.04.003 ↗
4. Jang BZ (1994) Advanced polymer composites: principles and applications. 1st edn, ASM International, OH, USA
5. Lin CT, Kao PW (1996) Composites A 27A:910.1016/1359-835X(95)00006-N ↗
6. Silva RA, Botelho EC, Pardini LC, Rezende MC (2004) J Appl Adhesion Technol 18:179910.1163/1568561042708377 ↗
7. Botelho EC, Pardini LC, Rezende MC (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 399:19010.1016/j.msea.2005.02.093 ↗
8. Taranets NY, Jones H (2004) J Mater Sci 39(18):572710.1023/B:JMSC.0000040082.16505.be ↗
9. De Rosa RL, Grant JT, Katsen L et al (2000) Corrosion 56(4):39510.5006/1.3280543 ↗
10. Silva RA, Botelho EC, Rezende MC, Pardini LC (2006) Mater Res 9:24710.1590/S1516-14392006000300002 ↗
11. Carrino L, Napolitano G, Sorrentino L (2006) Intl J Adv Manuf 34:46510.1007/s00170-005-0214-7 ↗
12. Polini W, Sorrentino L (2003) Appl Surface Sci 214:23210.1016/S0169-4332(03)00359-3 ↗
13. Kawai M, Hachinohe A, Takumida K, Kawase Y (2001) Composites A 32:13–2310.1016/S1359-835X(00)00135-4 ↗
14. Khan Z, Al-Sulaiman, Farooqi JK (1998) J Reinforced Plastics Comp 17:132010.1177/073168449801701501 ↗
15. Wyzgoski MG, Novak GE (1995) Polym Comp 16:3810.1002/pc.750160107 ↗
16. Ryan L, Monaghan J (2000) J Mater Process Technol 103:3610.1016/S0924-0136(00)00416-7 ↗
17. Reyes G, Cantwell WJ (2000) Compos Sci Technol 60:108510.1016/S0266-3538(00)00002-6 ↗
18. Davies P, Ducept F, Brunner AJ, Blackman BRK, Morais AB (1996) In: Seventh European conference on composite materials, London, UK, pp 14–16
19. Zweben C, Hahn HT, Chou T-W (1989) Mechanical behavior and properties of composite materials, delaware composites design encyclopedia, vol. 1. Lancaster, Pennsylvania, USA
20. Atodaria DR, Putatunda SK (1997) J Comp Mater 31(18):1810.1177/002199839703101804 ↗
21. Dagallaix G, Hassaïni D, Vittecoq E (2002) Intl J Fatigue 24:31910.1016/S0142-1123(01)00087-1 ↗
22. Gregory JR, Spearing SM (2005) Composites A 36:66510.1016/j.compositesa.2004.07.007 ↗
23. Botelho EC, Lauke B, Figiel L, Rezende MC (2003) Comp Sci Technol 63:184310.1016/S0266-3538(03)00119-2 ↗
24. Bureau MN, Denault J (2004) Comp Sci Technol 64:178310.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.016 ↗
25. Lin CT, Kao PW (1996) Acta Mater 44(3):118110.1016/1359-6454(95)00182-4 ↗
26. Davis JR (1993) Aluminum and aluminum alloys. ASM International, Metals Park, OH, USA