journal article·2015-02

Uniaxial tension of thin rubber liner sheets and hyperelastic model investigation

C. Liu, C. M. Cady, M. L. Lovato, E. B. Orler

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 50· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Uniaxial tension tests were performed on two different thin rubber liner sheets, the silica-filled and the Kevlar-filled EPDM rubber, for the purpose of establishing the constitutive relations via different hyperelasticity models. Due to the fact that the rubber liner sheet can sustain large amount of deformation, over 700 % engineering strain, we used the non-contact, optical technique of digital image correlation to measure local deformation over the sample surface. Three different hyperelastic models were considered for analyzing the experimental measurement, one is the neo-Hookean including the generalized neo-Hookean (GNH), the second is the Rivlin-type models including the special case of Mooney–Rivlin model, and the third is the Ogden model. Model parameters were determined by fitting the hyperelastic model to the experimental data. It was found that the Rivlin model up to the second order and the Ogden model capture the constitutive behavior of both the silica-filled and the Kevlar-filled rubber sheets quite well, while the GNH model can only describe the stress-stretch relation of the Kevlar-filled rubber sheet.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Elasticity and Material Modeling · Optical measurement and interference techniques · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (10)

Show source-provided references
1. Chu TC, Ranson WF, Sutton MA, Peters WH (1985) Applications of digital image correlation techniques to experimental mechanics. Exp Mech 25:232–24410.1007/BF02325092 ↗
2. Bruck HA, McNeil SR, Sutton MA, Peters WH (1989) Digital image correlation using Newton-Raphson method of partial differential correction. Exp Mech 29:261–26710.1007/BF02321405 ↗
3. Vendroux G, Knauss WG (1998) Submicron deformation field measurements: Part 2. Improved digital image correlation. Exp Mech 38:86–9210.1007/BF02321649 ↗
4. Sutton MA, McNeill SR, Helm JD, Chao YJ (2000) Advances in two-dimensional and three-dimensional computer vision. Top Appl Phys 77:323–37210.1007/3-540-48800-6_10 ↗
5. Knauss WG, Chasiotis I, Huang Y (2003) Mechanical measurements at the micron and nanometer scales. Mech Mater 35:217–23110.1016/S0167-6636(02)00271-5 ↗
6. Rivlin RS (1947) Torsion of a rubber cylinder. J Appl Phys 18:444–44910.1063/1.1697674 ↗
7. Knowles JK (1977) The finite anti-plane shear field near the tip of crack for a class of incompressible elastic solids. Int J Fract 13:611–63910.1007/BF00017296 ↗
8. Mooney M (1940) A theory of large elastic deformation. J Appl Phys 11:582–59210.1063/1.1712836 ↗
9. Rivlin RS (1948) Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials IV. Further developments of the general theory. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser A 241:379–39710.1098/rsta.1948.0024 ↗
10. Ogden RW (1972) Large deformation isotropic elasticity. On the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubber-like solids. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser A 326:565–58410.1098/rspa.1972.0026 ↗