journal article·2019-06Open access

Effect of photonic flash annealing with subsequent compression rolling on the topography, microstructure and electrical performance of carbon-based inks

Sarah-Jane Potts, Yin Cheung Lau, Thomas Dunlop, Tim Claypole, Chris Phillips

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 54· Issue 11

Abstract

Binders used in screen-printed carbon-based inks are typically non-conductive. Photonic annealing and subsequent compression rolling have therefore been employed to remove binder and consolidate the conductive particles. Using this method, screen-printable carbon inks containing graphite only, graphite nanoplatelets and a combination of graphite and carbon black were assessed. Photonic annealing leads to the degradation of the polymer binder separating the carbon morphologies, with subsequent compression rolling leading to significant reductions in print film thickness, roughness and improvements in particle orientation. Both processes lead to electrical performance enhancement for all printed inks assessed. The process was most effective for single graphitic morphologies with large gaps between conductors. These saw significant improvements, with reductions in electrical resistivity from 1.91 to 0.23 Ω cm for the graphite ink. The mixed carbon ink saw smaller but still significant improvements in print roughness and resistivity, from 0.037 to 0.019 Ω cm. Therefore, these postprocesses could widen the applications of common, low-cost carbon morphologies in screen printing inks.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Graphene research and applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Philip B, Jewell E, Greenwood P, Weirman C (2016) Material and process optimization screen printing carbon graphite pastes for mass production of heating elements. J Manuf Process 22(1):185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.03.00110.1016/j.jmapro.2016.03.001 ↗
2. Park HK, Kim SM, Lee JS, Park JH, Hong YK, Hong CH et al (2015) Flexible plane heater: graphite and carbon nanotube hybrid nanocomposite. Synth Met 203(1):127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2015.02.01510.1016/j.synthmet.2015.02.015 ↗
3. Serra N, Maeder T, Lemaire P, Ryser P, Maedera T, Lemaire P et al (2009) Formulation of composite resistive pastes for micro-heater manufacturing. Procedia Chem 1(1):48–5110.1016/j.proche.2009.07.012 ↗
4. Wang J, Tian B, Nascimento VB, Angnes L (1998) Performance of screen-printed carbon electrodes fabricated from different carbon inks. Electrochim Acta 43(23):3459–346510.1016/S0013-4686(98)00092-9 ↗
5. Morrin A, Killard AJ, Smyth MR (2003) Electrochemical characterization of commercial and home-made screen-printed carbon electrodes. Anal Lett 36(9):2021–203910.1081/AL-120023627 ↗
6. Knite M, Teteris V, Kiploka A, Kaupuzs J (2004) Polyisoprene-carbon black nanocomposites as tensile strain and pressure sensor materials. Sens Actuators A Phys 110(1–3):142–14910.1016/j.sna.2003.08.006 ↗
7. Tehrani Z, Korochkina T, Govindarajan S, Thomas DJ, Mahony JO, Kettle J et al (2015) Ultra-thin flexible screen printed rechargeable polymer battery for wearable electronic applications. Org Electron 26(1):386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2015.08.00710.1016/j.orgel.2015.08.007 ↗
8. Tehrani Z, Thomas DJ, Korochkina T, Phillips CO, Lupo D, Lehtim S et al (2017) Large-area printed supercapacitor technology for low-cost domestic green energy storage. Energy 118(1):1313–132110.1016/j.energy.2016.11.019 ↗
9. Philip B, Jewell E, Worsley D (2016) The impact of solvent characteristics on performance and process stability of printed carbon resistive materials. J Coatings Technol Res 13(5):911–92010.1007/s11998-016-9802-8 ↗
10. Zhang L, Liu T, Liu L, Hu M, Yang Y, Mei A et al (2015) The effect of carbon counter electrodes on fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cells. J Mater Chem A 3(17):9165–917010.1039/C4TA04647A ↗
11. Murakami TN, Ito S, Wang Q, Nazeeruddin MK, Bessho T, Cesar I et al (2006) Highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells based on carbon black counter electrodes. J Electrochem Soc 153(12):A2255. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.235808710.1149/1.2358087 ↗
12. Imoto K, Takahashi K, Yamaguchi T, Komura T, Nakamura JI, Murata K (2003) High-performance carbon counter electrode for dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 79(4):459–46910.1016/S0927-0248(03)00021-7 ↗
13. Phillips C, Al-Ahmadi A, Potts S-J, Claypole T, Deganello D (2017) The effect of graphite and carbon black ratios on conductive ink performance. J Mater Sci 52(16):9520–9530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1114-610.1007/s10853-017-1114-6 ↗
14. Jewell EH, Hamblyn SM, Claypole TC, Gethin DT (2013) The impact of carbon content and mesh on the characteristics of screen printed conductive structures. Circuit World 39(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/0305612131129891810.1108/03056121311298918 ↗
15. Oxfall H, Ariu G, Gkourmpis T, Rychwalski RW, Rigdahl M (2015) Effect of carbon black on electrical and rheological properties of graphite nanoplatelets/poly(ethylene-butyl acrylate) composites. Express Polym Lett 9(1):66–7610.3144/expresspolymlett.2015.7 ↗
16. Lee J, Arrigan DWM, Silvester DS (2016) Mechanical polishing as an improved surface treatment for platinum screen-printed electrodes. Sens Bio Sens Res 9:38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsr.2016.05.00610.1016/j.sbsr.2016.05.006 ↗
17. Kenfack A, Vemo BN, Ngoula F, Anyangwe FF, Chombong JK, Et Joseph Tchoumboué AMMT (2015) Comparison of laser and intense pulsed light sintering (IPL) for inkjet-printed copper nanoparticle layers. Sci Rep 5(8832):2–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0883210.1038/srep08832 ↗
18. Albrecht A, Rivadeneyra A, Abdellah A, Lugli P, Salmerón JF (2016) Inkjet printing and photonic sintering of silver and copper oxide nanoparticles for ultra-low-cost conductive patterns. J Mater Chem C. 4(16):3546–355410.1039/C6TC00628K ↗
19. Druffel T, Dharmadasa R, Lavery BW, Ankireddy K (2018) Intense pulsed light processing for photovoltaic manufacturing. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 174(1):359–36910.1016/j.solmat.2017.09.010 ↗
20. Troughton J, Carnie MJ, Davies ML (2016) Photonic flash-annealing of lead halide perovskite solar cells in 1 ms. J Mater Chem A 4(1):3471–347610.1039/C5TA09431C ↗
21. Galagan Y, Coenen EWC, Abbel R, Van Lammeren TJ, Sabik S, Barink M et al (2013) Photonic sintering of inkjet printed current collecting grids for organic solar cell applications. Org Electron 14(1):38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2012.10.01210.1016/j.orgel.2012.10.012 ↗
22. Amin Y, Chen Q, Zhen LR, Tenhunen H (2012) Design and fabrication of wideband archimedean spiral antenna based ultra-low cost “green” modules for RFID sensing and wireless applications. Prog Electromagn Res 130(1):241–25610.2528/PIER12070807 ↗
23. Turki BM, Abbel R, Barbosa S, Tate DJ, Oyeka D, Batchelor JC et al (2015) Inkjet printed paper based frequency selective surfaces and skin mounted RFID tags: the interrelation between silver nanoparticle ink, paper. J Mater Chem C 3(1):2132–2140
24. Secor EB, Ahn BY, Gao TZ, Lewis JA, Hersam MC (2015) Rapid and versatile photonic annealing of graphene inks for flexible printed electronics communication. Adv Mater 27(1):6683–668810.1002/adma.201502866 ↗
25. Kim H, Dhage SR, Shim D, Hahn HT (2009) Intense pulsed light sintering of copper nanoink for printed electronics. Appl Phys A 97(1):791–79810.1007/s00339-009-5360-6 ↗
26. Arapov K, Bex G, Hendriks R, Rubingh E, Abbel R, de With G et al (2016) Conductivity enhancement of binder-based graphene inks by photonic annealing and subsequent compression rolling. Adv Eng Mater 18(7):1234–123910.1002/adem.201500646 ↗
27. Coscia U, Palomba M, Ambrosone G, Barucca G, Cabibbo M, Mengucci P et al (2017) A new micromechanical approach for the preparation of graphene nanoplatelets deposited on polyethylene. Nanotechnology 28(19):19400110.1088/1361-6528/aa673d ↗
28. Malekpour H, Chang KH, Chen JC, Lu CY, Nika DL, Novoselov KS et al (2014) Thermal conductivity of graphene laminate. Nano Lett 14(9):5155–516110.1021/nl501996v ↗
29. Huang X, Leng T, Zhang X, Chen JC, Chang KH, Geim AK et al (2015) Binder-free highly conductive graphene laminate for low cost printed radio frequency applications. Appl Phys Lett 106(20):20310510.1063/1.4919935 ↗
30. El Baradai O, Beneventi D, Alloin F, Bongiovanni R, Bruas-Reverdy N, Bultel Y et al (2016) Microfibrillated cellulose based ink for eco-sustainable screen printed flexible electrodes in lithium ion batteries. J Mater Sci Technol 32(6):566–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2016.02.01010.1016/j.jmst.2016.02.010 ↗
31. Sheng Y, Fell CR, Son YK, Metz BM, Jiang J, Church BC (2014) Effect of calendering on electrode wettability in lithium-ion batteries. Front Energy Res 2(December):1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2014.0005610.3389/fenrg.2014.00056 ↗
32. Gnanaraj JS, Cohen YS, Levi MD, Aurbach D (2001) The effect of pressure on the electroanalytical response of graphite anodes and LiCoO2 cathodes for Li-ion batteries. J Electroanal Chem 516:89–10210.1016/S0022-0728(01)00663-5 ↗
33. Wang C, Yi Y, Sastry AM, Shim J, Striebel KA (2004) Particle compression and conductivity in li-ion anodes with graphite additives. J Electrochem Soc 151(9):A1489–A149810.1149/1.1783909 ↗
34. Smits FM (1958) Measurement of sheet resistivities with the four-point probe. Bell Syst Tech J 37(3):711–71810.1002/j.1538-7305.1958.tb03883.x ↗
35. Farnsworth S, Schroder K (2012) Photonic curing for millisecond-drying of thin films. Spec Print Worldw 1(4):34–36
36. Kadara RO, Jenkinson N, Banks CE (2009) Characterisation of commercially available electrochemical sensing platforms. Sens Actuators B Chem 138(2):556–56210.1016/j.snb.2009.01.044 ↗
37. Fanjul-Bolado P, Hernández-Santos D, Lamas-Ardisana PJ, Martín-Pernía A, Costa-García A (2008) Electrochemical characterization of screen-printed and conventional carbon paste electrodes. Electrochim Acta 53(10):3635–364210.1016/j.electacta.2007.12.044 ↗