journal article·2019-04Open access

3D pore analysis of gasoline particulate filters using X-ray tomography: impact of coating and ash loading

Heeje Seong, Seungmok Choi, Katarzyna E. Matusik, Alan L. Kastengren, Christopher F. Powell

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 54· Issue 8

Abstract

Since particulate emissions control technologies are dependent on filtration technologies, development of porous materials with optimized pore structures is crucial to improve filtration efficiency and pressure drop across filters. Despite increasing attention to 3D measurements of porous materials, there are few reports of pore structure investigations of diesel/gasoline particulate filters (D/GPFs) using 3D visualization techniques. In this work, GPF 3D pore structures were examined using X-ray tomography (XRT) to identify the impacts of catalyst coating or ash loading. Voxel resolution of 2.93 µm made it impossible to distinguish coating or ash materials from the cordierite substrate or to recognize smaller pores than the voxel resolution. However, pores up to 200 µm, which are responsible for the most pore volume, were successfully analyzed. Coating and ash loading resulted in lowering average pore diameter, total porosity, and open porosity, as the peak density of pore diameter at 60 µm decreased, while pores below 20 µm increased. Also, the visualized closed pores, which were homogeneously distributed throughout the bare filter, tended to get larger from inlet to outlet sides and more likely to be on the surface inlet due to coating and ash loading, indicating gas pathways originally existing in open pores were blocked due to coating and ash loading, leading to increased pressure drop. The ash impact was found to be more noticeable on mid and back positions than on front position. In addition, the investigation of areal porosity along the direction of gas flow suggested that while ash penetration could reach the outlet side as noted from increased closed pore population, most ash particles would be contained up to 150 µm. The 2D crosscut microscopic analysis that requires destructive procedures with the limited examination area could provide underestimation of ash penetration, whereas the 3D XRT analysis seems to provide more accurate information of pore structure changes due to ash loading at different locations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques · Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Sappok A, Wong VW (2010) Lubricant-derived ash properties and their effects on diesel particulate filter pressure-drop performance. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 133:032805-1–032805-12. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.400194410.1115/1.4001944 ↗
2. Guan B, Zhan R, Lin H, Huang Z (2015) Review of the state-of-the-art of exhaust particulate filter technology in internal combustion engines. J Environ Manag 154:225–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.02710.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.027 ↗
3. Lambert C, Chanko T, Dobson D, Liu X, Pakko J (2017) Gasoline particle filter development. Emiss Control Sci Technol 3:105–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40825-016-0055-x10.1007/s40825-016-0055-x ↗
4. Custer N, Kamp CJ, Sappok A, Pakko J, Lambert C, Boerensen C, Wong V (2016) Lubricant-derived ash impact on gasoline particulate filter performance. SAE Int J Engines 9:1604–1614. https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-094210.4271/2016-01-0942 ↗
5. Shao H, Lam W, Remias J, Roos J, Choi S, Seong H (2016) Effect of lubricant oil properties on the performance of gasoline particulate filter (GPF). SAE Int J Fuels Lubr 9:650–658. https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-228710.4271/2016-01-2287 ↗
6. Lambert CK, Bumbaroska M, Dobson D, Hangas J, Pakko J, Tennison P (2016) Analysis of high mileage gasoline exhaust particle filters. SAE Int J Engines 9:1296–1304. https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-094110.4271/2016-01-0941 ↗
7. Liu Y, Su C, Clerc J, Harinath A, Rogoski L (2015) Experimental and modeling study of ash impact on DPF backpressure and regeneration behaviors. SAE Int J Engines 8:1313–1321. https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-106310.4271/2015-01-1063 ↗
8. Yang J, Stewart M, Maupin G, Herling D, Zelenyuk A (2009) Single wall diesel particulate filter (DPF) filtration efficiency studies using laboratory generated particles. Chem Eng Sci 64:1625–1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2008.12.01110.1016/j.ces.2008.12.011 ↗
9. Hayashi H, Kubo S (2008) Computer simulation study on filtration of soot particles in diesel particulate filter. Comput Math Appl 55:1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2007.08.01210.1016/j.camwa.2007.08.012 ↗
10. Gong J, Stewart ML, Zelenyuk A, Strzelec A, Viswanathan S, Rothamer DA, Foster DE, Rutland CJ (2018) Importance of filter’s microstructure in dynamic filtration modeling of gasoline particulate filters (GPFs): inhomogeneous porosity and pore size distribution. Chem Eng J 338:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.00610.1016/j.cej.2018.01.006 ↗
11. Gong J, Viswanathan S, Rothamer DA, Foster DE, Rutland CJ (2017) Dynamic heterogeneous multiscale filtration model: probing micro- and macroscopic filtration characteristics of gasoline particulate filters. Environ Sci Technol 51:11196–11204. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b0253510.1021/acs.est.7b02535 ↗
12. Anovitz LM, Cole DR (2015) Characterization and analysis of porosity and pore structures. Rev Mineral Geochem 80:61–164. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2015.80.0410.2138/rmg.2015.80.04 ↗
13. Gaboreau S, Robinet J-C, Prêt D (2016) Optimization of pore-network characterization of a compacted clay material by TEM and FIB/SEM imaging. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 224:116–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.11.03510.1016/j.micromeso.2015.11.035 ↗
14. Yang F, Hingerl FF, Xiao X, Liu Y, Wu Z, Benson SM, Toney MF (2015) Extraction of pore-morphology and capillary pressure curves of porous media from synchrotron-based tomography data. Sci Rep 5:10635. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1063510.1038/srep10635 ↗
15. Yamamoto K, Sakai T (2016) Effect of pore structure on soot deposition in diesel particulate filter. Computation 4:46. https://doi.org/10.3390/computation404004610.3390/computation4040046 ↗
16. Kočí P, Isoz M, Plachá M, Arvajová A, Václavík M, Svoboda M, Price E, Novák V, Thompsett D (2017) 3D reconstruction and pore-scale modeling of coated catalytic filters for automotive exhaust gas aftertreatment. Catal Today 320:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2017.12.02510.1016/j.cattod.2017.12.025 ↗
17. Václavík M, Plachá M, Kočí P, Svoboda M, Hotchkiss T, Novák V, Thompsett D (2017) Structure characterisation of catalytic particulate filters for automotive exhaust gas aftertreatment. Mater Charact 134:311–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2017.11.01110.1016/j.matchar.2017.11.011 ↗
18. Chen Z, Wang X, Giuliani F, Atkinson A (2015) Analyses of microstructural and elastic properties of porous SOFC cathodes based on focused ion beam tomography. J Power Sources 273:486–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.13110.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.131 ↗
19. Boever ED, Varloteaux C, Nader FH, Foubert A, Békri S, Youssef S, Rosenberg E (2012) Quantification and prediction of the 3D pore network evolution in carbonate reservoir rocks. Oil Gas Sci Technol Rev D’IFP Energ Nouv 67:161–178. https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/201117010.2516/ogst/2011170 ↗
20. Hemes S, Desbois G, Urai JL, Schröppel B, Schwarz J-O (2015) Multi-scale characterization of porosity in Boom Clay (HADES-level, Mol, Belgium) using a combination of X-ray μ-CT, 2D BIB-SEM and FIB-SEM tomography. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 208:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.01.02210.1016/j.micromeso.2015.01.022 ↗
21. Manickam SS, Gelb J, McCutcheon JR (2014) Pore structure characterization of asymmetric membranes: non-destructive characterization of porosity and tortuosity. J Membr Sci 454:549–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.11.04410.1016/j.memsci.2013.11.044 ↗
22. Peng S, Hu Q, Dultz S, Zhang M (2012) Using X-ray computed tomography in pore structure characterization for a Berea sandstone: resolution effect. J Hydrol 472–473:254–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.09.03410.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.09.034 ↗
23. Ou X, Zhang X, Lowe T, Blanc R, Rad MN, Wang Y, Batail N, Pham C, Shokri N, Garforth AA, Withers PJ, Fan X (2017) X-ray micro computed tomography characterization of cellular SiC foams for their applications in chemical engineering. Mater Charact 123:20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2016.11.01310.1016/j.matchar.2016.11.013 ↗
24. Kastengren A, Powell CF, Arms D, Dufresne EM, Gibson H, Wang J (2012) The 7BM beamline at the APS: a facility for time-resolved fluid dynamics measurements. J Synchrotron Radiat 19:654–657. https://doi.org/10.1107/S090904951201688310.1107/S0909049512016883 ↗
25. Matusik KE, Duke DJ, Kastengren AL, Sovis N, Swantek AB, Powell CF (2017) High-resolution X-ray tomography of engine combustion network diesel injectors. Int J Engine Res 19:963–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/146808741773698510.1177/1468087417736985 ↗
26. Gürsoy D, De Carlo F, Xiao X, Jacobsen C (2014) TomoPy: a framework for the analysis of synchrotron tomographic data. J Synchrotron Radiat 21:1188–1193. https://doi.org/10.1107/S160057751401393910.1107/S1600577514013939 ↗
27. Karin P, Cui L, Rubio P, Tsuruta T, Hanamura K (2009) Microscopic visualization of PM trapping and regeneration in micro-structural pores of a DPF wall. SAE Int J Fuels Lubr 2:661–669. https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-147610.4271/2009-01-1476 ↗
28. Sanui R, Hanamura K (2016) Electron microscopic time-lapse visualization of surface pore filtration on particulate matter trapping process. J Microsc 263:250–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.1238610.1111/jmi.12386 ↗
29. Gong J, Rutland CJ (2015) PDF-based heterogeneous multiscale filtration model. Environ Sci Technol 49:4963–4970. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b0032910.1021/acs.est.5b00329 ↗
30. Giesche H (2006) Mercury porosimetry: a general (practical) overview. Part Part Syst Charact 23:9–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.20060100910.1002/ppsc.200601009 ↗
31. Yang Y, Rutland C, Rothamer D (2018) Study of the deep-bed filtration using pore filtration model (PFM). SAE Int J Fuels Lubr 11:287–299. https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-095610.4271/2018-01-0956 ↗
32. Li L, Choi S, Seong HJ, Vogt S (2016) X-ray fluorescence microscopy analyses of three-way catalyst aging and deactivation in gasoline particulate filter application. In: Microscopy and microanalysis, July 24–28, Columbus, OH, USA