journal article·2018-11

Hollow ZnO from assembly of nanoparticles: photocatalytic and antibacterial activity

Zakiullah Zaidi, Kalpesh Vaghasiya, Aditi Vijay, Manu Sharma, Rahul Kumar Verma, Sonalika Vaidya

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 53· Issue 21
Publisher page

Abstract

Hollow shells of ZnO were formed by the assembly of nanoparticles using PEG 400 wherein PEG-400 acted like both a solvent and a structure directing agent. The structure, morphology and optical properties were characterized by using PXRD, SEM, TEM and absorption studies. The hollow shells were found to possess high crystallinity with a surface area of 8 m2 g−1. The assembly was formed by nanoparticles ranging from 50 to 60 nm, whereas the size of the hollow shell ranged from 500 nm to 1 micron. Photocatalytic activity of these nanostructures was studied using Rhodamine B (RhB) and methyl orange (MO). Nearly 99% of the RhB dye was found to be degraded in 60 min while for MO, the degradation was 97% in 50 min. The pseudo-first-order rate constant was calculated as 0.072 min−1 for the degradation of RhB and 0.075 min−1 for the degradation of MO. The hollow shells were found to exhibit significant bacterial inhibiting efficacy at a low concentration of the particles. Comparative studies were carried out for photodegradation of Rhodamine B dye and antibacterial activity using spherical particles of ZnO and assembly of particles to form rods of ZnO. The results indicated that these hollow nanostructures could be used as a potential catalyst for the removal of dyes from water and as an antibacterial agent.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Kim D, Huh Y-D (2011) Mater Lett 65:2100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2011.04.07410.1016/j.matlet.2011.04.074 ↗
2. Gupta J, Bhargava P, Bahadur D (2014) Physica B 448:16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2014.03.08110.1016/j.physb.2014.03.081 ↗
3. Hui A, Ma J, Liu J, Bao Y, Zhang J (2017) J Alloy Compd 696:639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.31910.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.319 ↗
4. Wang Y, Li X, Wang N, Quan X, Chen Y (2008) Sep Purif Technol 62:727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2008.03.03510.1016/j.seppur.2008.03.035 ↗
5. Lu H, Wang S, Zhao L, Li J, Dong B, Xu Z (2011) J Mater Chem 21:4228. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0JM03390A10.1039/c0jm03390a ↗
6. Pung S-Y, Lee W-P, Aziz A (2012) Int J Inorg Chem 2012:9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/60818310.1155/2012/608183 ↗
7. Xu L, Hu Y-L, Pelligra C et al (2009) Chem Mater 21:2875. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm900608d10.1021/cm900608d ↗
8. Sun H, Yu Y, Luo J, Ahmad M, Zhu J (2012) CrystEngComm 14:8626. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CE26157J10.1039/c2ce26157j ↗
9. Rezapour M, Talebian N (2011) Mater Chem Phys 129:249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.04.01210.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.04.012 ↗
10. Vidovic S, Elder J, Medihala P et al (2015) Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:3317. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00363-1510.1128/AAC.00363-15 ↗
11. Espitia PJP, NdFF Soares JSdR, de Coimbra NJ, Andrade RS Cruz, Medeiros EAA (2012) Food Bioprocess Technol 5:1447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0797-610.1007/s11947-012-0797-6 ↗
12. Azam A, Ahmed AS, Oves M, Khan MS, Habib SS, Memic A (2012) Int J Nanomed 7:6003. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S3534710.2147/IJN.S35347 ↗
13. Li X, Xing Y, Jiang Y, Ding Y, Li W (2009) Int J Food Sci Technol 44:2161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2009.02055.x10.1111/j.1365-2621.2009.02055.x ↗
14. Padmavathy N, Vijayaraghavan R (2008) Sci Technol Adv Mater 9:035004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/9/3/03500410.1088/1468-6996/9/3/035004 ↗
15. Raghupathi KR, Koodali RT, Manna AC (2011) Langmuir 27:4020. https://doi.org/10.1021/la104825u10.1021/la104825u ↗
16. Talebian N, Amininezhad SM, Doudi M (2013) J Photochem Photobiol B 120:66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.01.00410.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.01.004 ↗
17. Liu J, Rojas-Andrade MD, Chata G et al (2018) Nanoscale 10:158. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR07367D10.1039/C7NR07367D ↗
18. Zhang L-H, Sun Q, Liu D-H, Lu A-H (2013) J Mat Chem A 1:9477. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TA10430C10.1039/c3ta10430c ↗
19. Zhang C, Yin L, Zhang L, Qi Y, Lun N (2012) Mater Lett 67:303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2011.09.07310.1016/j.matlet.2011.09.073 ↗
20. Patrinoiu G, Tudose M, Calderón-Moreno JM et al (2012) J Solid State Chem 186:17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2011.11.02410.1016/j.jssc.2011.11.024 ↗
21. Chen D, Ye J (2008) Adv Func Mater 18:1922. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20070146810.1002/adfm.200701468 ↗
22. Xia J, Yin S, Li H, Xu H, Yan Y, Zhang Q (2011) Langmuir 27:1200. https://doi.org/10.1021/la104054r10.1021/la104054r ↗
23. Liu Y, Xu C, Zhu Z, Lu J, Manohari AG, Shi Z (2018) Mater Res Bull 98:64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.09.05710.1016/j.materresbull.2017.09.057 ↗
24. Cao S-W, Zhu Y-J (2008) J Phys Chem C 112:6253. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp800046510.1021/jp8000465 ↗
25. Chen JS, Chen C, Liu J, Xu R, Qiao SZ, Lou XW (2011) Chem Commun 47:2631. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CC04471G10.1039/c0cc04471g ↗
26. Wang X, Liao M, Zhong Y et al (2012) Adv Mater 24:3421. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20120113910.1002/adma.201201139 ↗
27. Rao J, Yu A, Shao C, Zhou X (2012) ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:5346. https://doi.org/10.1021/am301296610.1021/am3012966 ↗
28. Ahmad T, Vaidya S, Sarkar N, Ghosh S, Ganguli AK (2006) Nanotechnology 17:123610.1088/0957-4484/17/5/012 ↗
29. Karakoti AS, Das S, Thevuthasan S, Seal S (2011) Angew Chem Int Ed 50:1980. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20100296910.1002/anie.201002969 ↗
30. Zhu C, Lu B, Su Q, Xie E, Lan W (2012) Nanoscale 4:3060. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2NR12010K10.1039/c2nr12010k ↗
31. Deng Z, Chen M, Gu G, Wu L (2008) J Phys Chem B 112:16. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp077662w10.1021/jp077662w ↗
32. Mousavi SM, Mahjoub AR, Abazari R (2015) RSC Adv 5:107378. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA19507A10.1039/C5RA19507A ↗
33. Lan S, Liu L, Li R, Leng Z, Gan S (2014) Ind Eng Chem Res 53:3131. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie404053m10.1021/ie404053m ↗
34. Sinha AK, Basu M, Pradhan M, Sarkar S, Pal T (2010) Chem A Eur J 16:7865. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.20090334710.1002/chem.200903347 ↗
35. Yu J, Yu X (2008) Environ Sci Technol 42:4902. https://doi.org/10.1021/es800036n10.1021/es800036n ↗
36. Patrinoiu G, Calderón-Moreno JM, Chifiriuc CM, Saviuc C, Birjega R, Carp O (2016) J Colloid Interface Sci 462:64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2015.09.05910.1016/j.jcis.2015.09.059 ↗
37. Suresh D, Udayabhanu PC Nethravathi et al (2015) Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 136:1467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2014.10.03810.1016/j.saa.2014.10.038 ↗
38. Suwanboon S, Klubnuan S, Jantha N, Amornpitoksuk P, Bangrak P (2014) Mater Lett 115:275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2013.10.06610.1016/j.matlet.2013.10.066 ↗