journal article·2017-10Open access

Analysis of thermal history effects on mechanical anisotropy of 3D-printed polymer matrix composites via in situ X-ray tomography

J. C. E. Mertens, K. Henderson, N. L. Cordes, R. Pacheco, X. Xiao, J. J. Williams, N. Chawla, B. M. Patterson

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 52· Issue 20

Abstract

The tensile behavior of an additively manufactured (AM) polymer matrix composite (PMC) is studied with in situ X-ray computed microtomography (CT) and digital volume correlation (DVC). In this experiment, the effects of recycled material content and print direction on the selective laser-sintered (SLS) material’s mechanical response are explored. The PMC samples are printed in a tensile specimen geometry with gage lengths parallel to all three orthogonal, primary sintering directions. In situ tensile-CT experiments are conducted at Argonne National Laboratory’s Advanced Photon Source 2-BM beamline. Analysis of the AM PMC’s tensile response, failure, and strain evolution is analyzed both from a conventional standpoint, using the load–displacement data recorded by the loading fixture, and from a microstructural standpoint by applying DVC analysis to the reconstructed volumes. Significant variations on both strength and ductility are observed from both vantages with respect to print direction and the recycled material content in the printed parts. It is found that the addition of recycled source material with a thermal history reduces the tensile strength of the SLS composite for all directions, but the effect is drastic on the strength in the layering direction.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B (2010) Additive manufacturing technologies. Springer, New York, pp 1–310.1007/978-1-4419-1120-9 ↗
2. Zhai Y, Lados DA, LaGoy JL (2014) Additive manufacturing: making imagination the major limitation. JOM 66(5):808–81610.1007/s11837-014-0886-2 ↗
3. Spacex launches 3D-printed part to space, creates printed engine chamber. (2016) SpaceX. N.p., Web. 2 2016
4. Atzeni E, Salmi A (2012) Economics of additive manufacturing for end-usable metal parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(9–12):1147–115510.1007/s00170-011-3878-1 ↗
5. Heidi P, Thomas W, Ari H, Jari J, Antti S, Petri K, Olli N (2013) Digital design process and additive manufacturing of a configurable product. Adv Sci Lett 19(3):926–93110.1166/asl.2013.4827 ↗
6. Smith H (2013) 3D printing news and trends: GE aviation to grow better fuel nozzles using 3D printing. 3dprintingreviews.blogspot.co.uk. N.p. Web. 2 June 2016
7. Horn TJ, Harrysson OL (2012) Overview of current additive manufacturing technologies and selected applications. Sci Prog 95(3):255–28210.3184/003685012X13420984463047 ↗
8. Hague R, Campbell I, Dickens P (2003) Implications on design of rapid manufacturing. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 217(1):25–3010.1243/095440603762554587 ↗
9. Doubrovski Z, Verlinden JC, Geraedts JM (2011) Optimal design for additive manufacturing: opportunities and challenges. In: ASME 2011 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 635–64610.1115/DETC2011-48131 ↗
10. Kruth JP, Leu MC, Nakagawa T (1998) Progress in additive manufacturing and rapid prototyping. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 47(2):525–54010.1016/S0007-8506(07)63240-5 ↗
11. Lü L, Fuh JYH, Wong YS (2001) Selective laser sintering. Springer, New York, pp 89–142
12. Bremen S, Meiners W, Diatlov A (2012) Selective laser melting. Laser Tech J 9(2):33–3810.1002/latj.201290018 ↗
13. Thrimurthulu K, Pandey PM, Reddy NV (2004) Optimum part deposition orientation in fused deposition modeling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(6):585–59410.1016/j.ijmachtools.2003.12.004 ↗
14. Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23(6):1917–192810.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
15. Dotchev K, Yusoff W (2009) Recycling of polyamide 12 based powders in the laser sintering process. Rapid Prototyp J 15(3):192–20310.1108/13552540910960299 ↗
16. Carroll BE, Palmer TA, Beese AM (2015) Anisotropic tensile behavior of Ti–6Al–4V components fabricated with directed energy deposition additive manufacturing. Acta Mater 87:309–32010.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.054 ↗
17. Holesinger TG, Carpenter JS, Lienert TJ, Patterson BM, Papin PA, Swenson H, Cordes NL (2016) Characterization of an aluminum alloy hemispherical shell fabricated via direct metal laser melting. JOM 68:1–1210.1007/s11837-015-1798-5 ↗
18. Ahn SH, Montero M, Odell D, Roundy S, Wright PK (2002) Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyp J 8(4):248–25710.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
19. Adamczak S, Bochnia J, Kaczmarska B (2015) An analysis of tensile test results to assess the innovation risk for an additive manufacturing technology. Metrol Meas Syst 22(1):127–13810.1515/mms-2015-0015 ↗
20. Guessasma S, Belhabib S, Nouri H (2015) Significance of pore percolation to drive anisotropic effects of 3D printed polymers revealed with X-ray μ-tomography and finite element computation. Polymer 81:29–3610.1016/j.polymer.2015.10.041 ↗
21. Khademzadeh S, Carmignato S, Parvin N, Zanini F, Bariani PF (2016) Micro porosity analysis in additive manufactured NiTi parts using micro computed tomography and electron microscopy. Mater Des 90:745–75210.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.161 ↗
22. Smith DH, Bicknell J, Jorgensen L, Patterson BM, Cordes NL, Tsukrov I, Knezevic M (2016) Microstructure and mechanical behavior of direct metal laser sintered Inconel alloy 718. Mater Charact 113:1–910.1016/j.matchar.2016.01.003 ↗
23. Sercombe TB, Xu X, Challis VJ, Green R, Yue S, Zhang Z, Lee PD (2015) Failure modes in high strength and stiffness to weight scaffolds produced by selective laser melting. Mater Des 67:501–50810.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.063 ↗
24. Leuders S et al (2013) On the mechanical behaviour of titanium alloy TiAl6V4 manufactured by selective laser melting: fatigue resistance and crack growth performance. Int J Fatigue 48:300–30710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.11.011 ↗
25. Sterling AJ, Torries B, Seely DW, Lugo M, Shamsaei N, Thompson SM (2015) Fatigue behavior of Ti–6Al–4V alloy additively manufactured by laser engineered net shaping. In: Proceedings of the 56th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Kissimmee, FL10.2514/6.2015-1354 ↗
26. Patterson BM, Cordes NL, Henderson K, Williams JJ, Stannard T, Singh SS, Ovejero AR, Xiao X, Robinson M, Chawla N (2016) In situ X-ray synchrotron tomographic imaging during the compression of hyper-elastic polymeric materials. J Mater Sci 51(1):171–187. doi: 10.1007/s10853-015-9355-810.1007/s10853-015-9355-8 ↗
27. Patterson BM, Henderson K, Gilbertson RD, Tornga S, Cordes NL, Chavez ME, Smith Z (2014) Morphological and performance measures of polyurethane foams using X-ray CT and mechanical testing. Microsc Microanal 20(04):1284–129310.1017/S1431927614000993 ↗
28. Karlsson J, Sjögren T, Snis A, Engqvist H, Lausmaa J (2014) Digital image correlation analysis of local strain fields on Ti6Al4V manufactured by electron beam melting. Mater Sci Eng A 618:456–46110.1016/j.msea.2014.09.022 ↗
29. Gürsoy D, De Carlo F, Xiao X, Jacobsen C (2014) TomoPy: a framework for the analysis of synchrotron tomographic data. J Synchrotron Radiat 21(5):1188–119310.1107/S1600577514013939 ↗
30. Dowd BA, Campbell GH, Marr RB, Nagarkar VV, Tipnis SV, Axe L, Siddons DP (1999) Developments in synchrotron X-ray computed microtomography at the national synchrotron light source. In: SPIE’s International symposium on optical science, engineering, and instrumentation. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 224–23610.1117/12.363725 ↗
31. Münch B, Trtik P, Marone F, Stampanoni M (2009) Stripe and ring artifact removal with combined wavelet—Fourier filtering. Opt Express 17(10):8567–859110.1364/OE.17.008567 ↗
32. Paganin D, Mayo SC, Gureyev TE, Miller PR, Wilkins SW (2002) Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homogeneous object. J Microsc 206(1):33–4010.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01010.x ↗
33. Singh SS, Williams JJ, Hruby P, Xiao X, De Carlo F, Chawla N (2014) In situ experimental techniques to study the mechanical behavior of materials using X-ray synchrotron tomography. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 3(1):1–1410.1186/2193-9772-3-9 ↗
34. Williams JJ, Chapman NC, Jakkali V, Tanna VA, Chawla N, Xiao X, De Carlo F (2011) Characterization of damage evolution in SiC particle reinforced Al alloy matrix composites by in situ X-ray synchrotron tomography. Metall Mater Trans A 42(10):2999–300510.1007/s11661-011-0718-8 ↗
35. Bay BK, Smith TS, Fyhrie DP, Saad M (1999) Digital volume correlation: three-dimensional strain mapping using X-ray tomography. Exp Mech 39(3):217–22610.1007/BF02323555 ↗
36. Bay BK (2008) Methods and applications of digital volume correlation. J Strain Anal Eng Des 43(8):745–76010.1243/03093247JSA436 ↗
37. Shan GF, Yang W, Yang MB, Xie BH, Feng JM, Fu Q (2007) Effect of temperature and strain rate on the tensile deformation of polyamide 6. Polymer 48(10):2958–296810.1016/j.polymer.2007.03.013 ↗
38. Sumita M, Shizuma T, Miyasaka K, Ishikawa K (1983) Effect of reducible properties of temperature, rate of strain, and filler content on the tensile yield stress of nylon 6 composites filled with ultrafine particles. J Macromol Sci B Phys 22(4):601–61810.1080/00222348308224779 ↗
39. Li Z, Lambros J (2001) Strain rate effects on the thermomechanical behavior of polymers. Int J Solids Struct 38(20):3549–356210.1016/S0020-7683(00)00223-7 ↗