Preparation and characterization of highly conductive polyurethane composites containing graphene and gold nanoparticles
Source abstract
Abstract
Two series of gold nanoparticles/graphene/polyurethane composite films were prepared using a solution mixing method. The first series was of constant loading of graphene/polyurethane with varying levels of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), while the second was of varying graphene content with constant loading of AuNPs. The electrical conductivity of the AuNPs/graphene/polyurethane composites was determined using the two-point probe method. For the first series, a maximum conductivity of 0.424 S cm−1 was achieved with a 5% AuNPs/5% graphene/polyurethane composite, and for the second, a maximum conductivity of 1.388 S cm−1 was achieved with a 5% AuNPs/15% graphene/polyurethane composite. The composites were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetric analysis, and tensile testing methods. Tensile strengths and thermogravimetric analyses showed, respectively, acceptable mechanical properties and thermal stability of the parent polyurethanes. Furthermore, cytotoxicity assay tests evidenced that AuNPs/graphene/polyurethane composites were not cytotoxic to living cells in vitro and, consequently, potentially useful in biomedical applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Graphene research and applications · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Jagur-Grodzinski J (2012) Biomedical applications of electrically conductive polymeric systems. e-Polymers 12(1):722–74010.1515/epoly.2012.12.1.722 ↗
2. Granström M, Inganäs O (1995) Electrically conductive polymer fibres with mesoscopic diameters: 1. Studies of structure and electrical properties. Polymer 36(15):2867–287210.1016/0032-3861(95)94335-Q ↗
3. Kim DH et al (2007) Effect of immobilized nerve growth factor on conductive polymers: electrical properties and cellular response. Adv Funct Mater 17(1):79–8610.1002/adfm.200500594 ↗
4. Kaur G et al (2015) Electrically conductive polymers and composites for biomedical applications. RSC Adv 5(47):37553–3756710.1039/C5RA01851J ↗
5. Wang W et al (2014) One-pot fabrication and thermoelectric properties of Ag nanoparticles–polyaniline hybrid nanocomposites. RSC Adv 4(51):26810–2681610.1039/C4RA02136C ↗
6. Gunatillake PA et al (2003) Designing biostable polyurethane elastomers for biomedical implants. Aust J Chem 56(6):545–55710.1071/CH02168 ↗
7. Gunatillake PA et al (2000) Poly (dimethylsiloxane)/poly (hexamethylene oxide) mixed macrodiol based polyurethane elastomers. I. Synthesis and properties. J Appl Polym Sci 76(14):2026–204010.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000628)76:14<2026::AID-APP5>3.0.CO;2-X ↗
8. Gogolewski S (1989) Selected topics in biomedical polyurethanes. A review. Colloid Polym Sci 267(9):757–78510.1007/BF01410115 ↗
9. Kathalewar MS et al (2013) Non-isocyanate polyurethanes: from chemistry to applications. RSC Adv 3(13):4110–412910.1039/c2ra21938g ↗
10. Hsu S-H, Tang C-M, Tseng H-J (2008) Gold nanoparticles induce surface morphological transformation in polyurethane and affect the cellular response. Biomacromolecules 9(1):241–24810.1021/bm700471k ↗
11. Shukla R et al (2005) Biocompatibility of gold nanoparticles and their endocytotic fate inside the cellular compartment: a microscopic overview. Langmuir 21(23):10644–1065410.1021/la0513712 ↗
12. Daniel M-C, Astruc D (2004) Gold nanoparticles: assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size-related properties, and applications toward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology. Chem Rev 104(1):293–34610.1021/cr030698+ ↗
13. Matte HR, Subrahmanyam K, Rao C (2009) Novel magnetic properties of graphene: presence of both ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic features and other aspects. J Phys Chem C 113(23):9982–998510.1021/jp903397u ↗
14. Sun X et al (2013) Developing polymer composite materials: carbon nanotubes or graphene? Adv Mater 25(37):5153–517610.1002/adma.201301926 ↗
15. Potts JR et al (2011) Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites. Polymer 52(1):5–2510.1016/j.polymer.2010.11.042 ↗
16. Mittal V, Nuzzo R, Kroto H (2012) Polymer-graphene nanocomposites. Royal Society of Chemistry, London10.1039/9781849736794 ↗
17. Stankovich S et al (2006) Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442(7100):282–28610.1038/nature04969 ↗
18. Kaur G et al (2015) Graphene/polyurethane composites: fabrication and evaluation of electrical conductivity, mechanical properties and cell viability. RSC Adv 5(120):98762–9877210.1039/C5RA20214K ↗
19. Hsu S-H, Lin Z-C (2004) Biocompatibility and biostability of a series of poly(carbonate)urethanes. Colloids Surf B 36(1):1–1210.1016/j.colsurfb.2004.04.003 ↗
20. Shan C et al (2010) Graphene/AuNPs/chitosan nanocomposites film for glucose biosensing. Biosens Bioelectron 25(5):1070–107410.1016/j.bios.2009.09.024 ↗
21. Simmons A et al (2004) Long-term in vivo biostability of poly(dimethylsiloxane)/poly(hexamethylene oxide) mixed macrodiol-based polyurethane elastomers. Biomaterials 25(20):4887–490010.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.004 ↗
22. Choi J et al (2013) Facile solvothermal preparation of monodisperse gold nanoparticles and their engineered assembly of ferritin-gold nanoclusters. Langmuir 29(50):15698–1570310.1021/la403888f ↗
23. Turcheniuk K, Boukherroub R, Szunerits S (2015) Gold–graphene nanocomposites for sensing and biomedical applications. J Mater Chem B 3(21):4301–432410.1039/C5TB00511F ↗
24. Mudumba R, Padsalgikar AD, Littler SW (2006) Evaluation of aqueous extracts from Elast-Eon polymers for methylene dianiline (MDA) by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Aust J Chem 58(12):845–85010.1071/CH05240 ↗
25. Hernandez R et al (2008) In vitro oxidation of high polydimethylsiloxane content biomedical polyurethanes: correlation with the microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 87(2):546–55610.1002/jbm.a.31823 ↗
26. Polavarapu L et al (2009) Optical-limiting properties of oleylamine-capped gold nanoparticles for both femtosecond and nanosecond laser pulses. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 1(10):2298–230310.1021/am900442u ↗
27. Ramaraj B (2007) Electrical and mechanical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane and polytetrafluoroethylene powder composites. Polym Plast Technol Eng 46(6):575–57810.1080/03602550701298671 ↗
28. Compton OC, Nguyen ST (2010) Graphene oxide, highly reduced graphene oxide, and graphene: versatile building blocks for carbon-based materials. Small 6(6):711–72310.1002/smll.200901934 ↗
29. Ahmad R et al (2015) Nanocomposites of gold nanoparticles@ molecularly imprinted polymers: chemistry, processing, and applications in sensors. Chem Mater 27(16):5464–547810.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00138 ↗
30. Zadeh EM et al (2014) Physical and thermal characterization of graphene oxide modified gelatin-based thin films. Polym Compos 35(10):2043–204910.1002/pc.22865 ↗
31. Xu Y et al (2008) Flexible graphene films via the filtration of water-soluble noncovalent functionalized graphene sheets. J Am Chem Soc 130(18):5856–585710.1021/ja800745y ↗
32. Yousefi N et al (2012) Self-alignment and high electrical conductivity of ultralarge graphene oxide–polyurethane nanocomposites. J Mater Chem 22(25):12709–1271710.1039/c2jm30590a ↗
33. Rana S, Cho JW, Tan LP (2013) Graphene-crosslinked polyurethane block copolymer nanocomposites with enhanced mechanical, electrical, and shape memory properties. RSC Adv 3(33):13796–1380310.1039/c3ra40711j ↗
34. Kotzar G et al (2002) Evaluation of MEMS materials of construction for implantable medical devices. Biomaterials 23(13):2737–275010.1016/S0142-9612(02)00007-8 ↗