Residual stress determination in a thick ferritic steel weld plate using neutron diffraction
Source abstract
Abstract
The distribution of residual stresses was determined through the thickness of a 50-mm thick ferritic steel weld plate using (110) and/or (211) diffraction peaks. We proposed a two-peak combined methodology, which uses (110) and (211) peaks designed to have neutron wavelengths of 2.39 and 1.55 A, respectively, in order to locate the neutron cross-section at each local minimum. The result shows that the available penetration path length can be maximized by (110) diffraction for the transmission geometry and (211) diffraction for the reflection geometry of the plate specimen. Furthermore, the stress components by the two peaks were similar to the results of the conventional one-peak measurement due to the same diffraction elastic constants between the (110) and (211) peaks in the bcc ferritic steel. Such appropriately combined two-peak method can significantly enhance the deep penetration capability for the determination of residual stresses in an extra thick steel plate specimen.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Hutchings MT, Withers PJ, Holden TM, Lorentzen T (2005) In: Introduction to the characterization of residual stress by neutron diffraction, CRS Press, Boca Raton10.1201/9780203402818 ↗
2. Withers PJ (2004) J Appl Cryst 37:60710.1107/S0021889804012750 ↗
3. Santistaban JR, Daymond MR, James JA, Edvards L (2006) J Appl Cryst 39:81210.1107/S0021889806042245 ↗
4. Woo W, Em V, Seong BS, Shin E, Mikula P, Joo J, Kang M (2011) J Appl Cryst 44:74710.1107/S0021889811018899 ↗
5. Mikula P, Kulda J, Lukas P, Vrana M, Wagner V (1994) Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 338:1810.1016/0168-9002(94)90156-2 ↗
6. Popovici M, Yelon WB, Berliner R, Stoica AD, Ionita I, Law R (1994) Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 338:9910.1016/0168-9002(94)90168-6 ↗
7. Moon MK, Em V, Lee CH, Mikula P, Hong KP, Choi YN, Cheon JK, Nam UW, Kong KN, Jin KC (2005) Phys B 368:7010.1016/j.physb.2005.06.044 ↗
8. Seong BS, Em V, Mikula P, Saroun J, Kang M (2010) J Appl Cryst 43:65410.1107/S0021889810008551 ↗
9. Holden TM, Suzuki H, Carr DG, Ripley MI, Clausen B (2006) Mater Sci Eng, A 185:3310.1016/j.msea.2006.04.055 ↗
10. Woo W, Choo H, Withers PJ, Feng Z (2009) J Mater Sci 44:6302. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3868-y10.1007/s10853-009-3868-y ↗
11. Xu XF, Liu JH, Zhn HQ (2011) J Mater Sci 46:1161. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4886-510.1007/s10853-010-4886-5 ↗
12. Ranjbarnodeh E, Serazadeh S, Kokabi AH, Fischer A (2011) J Mater Sci 46:3225. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-5207-810.1007/s10853-010-5207-8 ↗
13. Woo W, Em V, Mikula P, An GB, Seong BS (2011) Mater Sci Eng, A 528:412010.1016/j.msea.2011.02.009 ↗
14. Ganguly S, Edwards L, Fitzpatrick ME (2011) Mater Sci Eng, A 528:122610.1016/j.msea.2010.10.039 ↗
15. Krawitz AD, Windholtz RA (1994) Mater Sci Eng, A 185:12310.1016/0921-5093(94)90935-0 ↗
16. Woo W, Feng Z, Wang X-L, David SA (2011) Sci Technol Weld Join 16:2310.1179/136217110X12731414739916 ↗