Effect of ultrasonic vibration during casting on microstructures and properties of 7050 aluminum alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
The microstructures and properties of ultrasonic and conventional cast 7050 aluminum alloys have been studied. Compared with the conventional cast alloy, the ultrasonic cast ingot (UI) is characterized with a finer microstructure than that in the conventional cast ingot (CI). For the hot-rolled plates, the UI alloy can be aged faster and aging-strengthened easier than the CI alloy. When aged at 120 °C, the UI alloy reaches its peak strength after 8 h, with tensile strength of 602 MPa, yield strength of 547 MPa and elongation of 12.7%, respectively, whereas the CI alloy plate is with its tensile strength, yield strength and elongation of 536 MPa, 462 MPa and 15.0%, respectively, after peak aged for 12 h.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Heinz A, Haszler A, Keidel C, Moldenhauer S, Benedictus R, Miller WS (2000) Mater Sci Eng A 280(1):10210.1016/S0921-5093(99)00674-7 ↗
2. Xie F, Yan X, Ding L, Zhang F, Chen S, Chu M, Chang YA (2003) Mater Sci Eng A 355(1–2):14410.1016/S0921-5093(03)00056-X ↗
3. Wu YL, Froes FH, Alvarez A, Li CG, Liu J (1997) Mater Design 18(4):21110.1016/S0261-3069(97)00084-8 ↗
4. Paramatmuni RK, Chang KM, Kang BS, Liu X (2004) Mater Sci Eng A 397(2):29310.1016/j.msea.2004.02.026 ↗
5. Schubbe JJ (2009) Eng Fract Mech 76(8):103710.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.01.006 ↗
6. Carvalho ALM, Voorwald HJC (2009) Mater Sci Eng A 505(1–2):3110.1016/j.msea.2008.10.053 ↗
7. Cooper KR, Kelly RG (2007) Corros Sci 49(6):263610.1016/j.corsci.2006.12.001 ↗
8. Schubbe JJ (2009) Eng Fail Anal 16(1):34010.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.05.009 ↗
9. Wu S, Zhao J, Zhang L, Ping A, Mao Y (2008) Solid State Phenom (141–143): 451–45610.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.141-143.451 ↗
10. Zhang L, Yu J, Zhang X (2010) J Cent South Univ Technol 17:43110.1007/s11771-010-0502-8 ↗
11. Liu R, Li X, Ma W, Jiang R (2008) Mach Design Manuf 5:103
12. Zuo Y, Cui J, Zhao Z, Zhang H, Qin K (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 406(1–2):286
13. Zhang B, Cui J (2003) Mater Lett 57(11):170710.1016/S0167-577X(02)01055-8 ↗
14. Reddy AV, Beckermann C (1997) Met Mater Trans B 28(3):47910.1007/s11663-997-0115-2 ↗
15. Zhao Z, Cui J, Dong J, Zhang B (2007) J Mater Process Technol 182(1–3):18510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.07.029 ↗
16. Abramov OV (1987) Ultrasonics 25:7310.1016/0041-624X(87)90063-1 ↗
17. ESKIN GI (1997) Adv Perform Mater 4:22310.1023/A:1008603815525 ↗
18. Eskin GI (2001) Ultra Sonochem 8:31910.1016/S1350-4177(00)00074-2 ↗
19. Zhang B, Cui J, Lu G (2003) Mater Sci Eng A 355(1–2):32510.1016/S0921-5093(03)00105-9 ↗
20. Shen K, Chen J, Yin Z (2009) Trans Nonferr Met Soc China 19(6):140510.1016/S1003-6326(09)60041-8 ↗
21. Vreeman CJ, Krane M, Incropera FP (2000) Int J Heat Mass Transf 43(5):68710.1016/S0017-9310(99)00175-1 ↗
22. Berg LK, Gjonnes J, Hansen V, Li XZ, Knutson-Wedel M, Waterloo G, Schryvers D, Wallenberg LR (2001) Acta Mater 49(17):344310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00251-8 ↗
23. Engdahl T, Hansen V, Warren PJ, Stiller K (2002) Mater Sci Eng A 327(1):5910.1016/S0921-5093(01)01876-7 ↗
24. Ban C, Cui J, Ba Q, Lu G, Zhang B (2002) Acta Metall Sin 15(4):380
25. Dumont M, Lefebvre W, Doisneau-Cottignies B, Deschamps A (2005) Acta Mater 53(10):288110.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.004 ↗
26. Du Z, Sun Z, Shao B, Zhou T, Chen C (2006) Mater Charact 56(2):12110.1016/j.matchar.2005.10.004 ↗
27. Nie J, Muddle B, Polmear IJ (1996) Mater Sci Forum 217(2):125710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.217-222.1257 ↗
28. Sha G, Cerezo A (2005) Acta Mater 53(4):90710.1016/j.actamat.2004.10.048 ↗