The predominant role of Zn6Y9 cluster in the long period stacking order structures of Mg–Zn–Y alloys: a first-principles study
Source abstract
Abstract
The strengthening mechanisms underlying the long period stacking order (LPSO) phases in Mg–Zn–Y alloys have largely remained unsolved due to unclear understanding of the local arrangements of Zn and Y atoms in the LPSO phases. The local arrangements of Zn and Y atoms in the LPSO structures are theoretically refined with first-principles method in this study. The calculations clearly demonstrate that Zn and Y atoms prefer clustering in the form of Zn6Y9 rather than arranging in random or ordered arrangements, or in the form of Zn6Y8 cluster, as proposed in previous experiments. The Zn6Y9 cluster, which leads to the formation of ABCA-type building block of the LPSO structures, can be particularly regarded as the ideal stoichiometric component of the LPSO structures. Various non-stoichiometric Zn m Y n (Mg) clusters derived from the Zn6Y9 cluster can also easily exist in the LPSO structures. The non-stoichiometric Zn m Y n (Mg) clusters may correspond to the arrangements of Zn and Y atoms in the LPSO phases with different Zn/Y ratios. This study indicates that the novel structures of the LPSO phases consisting of ABCA-type building blocks stem from the formation of the Zn6Y9 cluster and its derivative clusters, Zn m Y n (Mg).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Inoue A, Kawamura Y, Matsushita M, Hayashi K, Koike J (2001) J Mater Res 16:189410.1557/JMR.2001.0260 ↗
2. Abe E, Kawamura Y, Hayashi K, Inoue A (2002) Acta Mater 50:384510.1016/S1359-6454(02)00191-X ↗
3. Chino Y, Mabuchi M, Hagiwara S, Iwasaki H, Yamamoto A, Tsubakino H (2004) Scr Mater 51:71110.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.06.007 ↗
4. Yoshimoto S, Yamasaki M, Kawamura Y (2006) Mater Trans 47:95910.2320/matertrans.47.959 ↗
5. Hagihara K, Kinoshita A, Sugino Y et al (2010) Acta Mater 58:628210.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.050 ↗
6. Itoi T, Inazawa T, Kuroda Y, Yamasaki M, Kawamura Y, Hirohashi M (2010) Mater Lett 64:227710.1016/j.matlet.2010.07.053 ↗
7. Shao XH, Yang ZQ, Ma XL (2010) Acta Mater 58:476010.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.012 ↗
8. Oñorbe E, Garcés G, Pérez P, Adeva P (2012) J Mater Sci 47:1085. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5899-410.1007/s10853-011-5899-4 ↗
9. Luo ZP, Zhang SQ (2000) J Mater Sci Lett 19:81310.1023/A:1006793411506 ↗
10. Matsuda M, Ii S, Kawamura Y, Ikuhara Y, Nishida M (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 393:26910.1016/j.msea.2004.10.040 ↗
11. Abe E, Ono A, Itoi T, Yamasaki M, Kawamura Y (2011) Phil Mag Lett 91:69010.1080/09500839.2011.609149 ↗
12. Itoi T, Seimiya T, Kawamura Y, Hirohashi M (2004) Scr Mater 51:10710.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.04.003 ↗
13. Zhu YM, Weyland M, Morton AJ, Oh-Ishi K, Hono K, Nie JF (2009) Scr Mater 60:98010.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.02.029 ↗
14. Zhu YM, Morton AJ, Nie JF (2010) Acta Mater 58:293610.1016/j.actamat.2010.01.022 ↗
15. Ping DH, Hono K, Kawamura Y, Inoue A (2002) Phil Mag Lett 82:54310.1080/0950083021000018652 ↗
16. Egusa D, Abe E (2012) Acta Mater 60:16610.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.030 ↗
17. Soler JM, Artacho E, Gale JD et al (2002) J Phys Condens Matter 14:274510.1088/0953-8984/14/11/302 ↗
18. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Phys Rev Lett 77:386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
19. Troullier N, Martins JL (1991) Phys Rev B 43:199310.1103/PhysRevB.43.1993 ↗
20. http://www.cohp.de/ . Accessed 30 May 2012