journal article·2006-12

Experimental determination of solid–liquid interfacial energy for succinonitrile solid solution in equilibrium with the succinonitrile–(D) camphor eutectic liquid

K. Keşlioğlu, U. Böyük, M. Erol, N. Maraşlı

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 41· Issue 23
Publisher page

Abstract

The equilibrated grain boundary groove shapes for Succinonitrile (SCN) solid solution in equilibrium with the Succinonitrile (SCN)–D Camphor (DC) eutectic liquid were directly observed. From the observed grain boundary groove shapes, the Gibbs–Thomson coefficient and solid–liquid interface energy for SCN solid solution in equilibrium with the SCN–DC eutectic liquid has been determined to be (5.39 ± 0.27) × 10−8 K m and (7.88 ± 0.79) × 10−3 J m−2 with present numerical method and Gibbs–Thomson equation, respectively. The grain boundary energy of SCN rich phase of the SCN–DC eutectic system has been determined to be (14.95 ± 1.79) × 10−3 J m−2 from the observed grain boundary groove shapes. Thermal conductivity ratio of the liquid phase to the solid phase for SCN–0.16 mole % DC alloy has also been measured.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Material Dynamics and Properties · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Ionic liquids properties and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Jones DRH, Chadwick GA (1970) Phil Mag 22:29110.1080/14786437008228225 ↗
2. Jones DRH, Chadwick GA (1971) J Cryst Growth 11:26010.1016/0022-0248(71)90094-7 ↗
3. Jones DRH (1978) Phil Mag 27:56910.1080/14786437308219232 ↗
4. Schaefer RJ, Glicksman ME, Ayers JD (1975) Phil Mag 32:72510.1080/14786437508221616 ↗
5. Hardy SC (1977) Phil Mag 35:47110.1080/14786437708237066 ↗
6. Nash GE, Glicksman ME (1971) Phil Mag 24:57710.1080/14786437108217031 ↗
7. Bolling GF, Tiller WA (1960) J Appl Phys 31/8:134510.1063/1.1735840 ↗
8. Singh NB, Glicksman ME (1989) J Cryst Growth 98:57310.1016/0022-0248(89)90293-5 ↗
9. Stalder I, Bilgram JH (2003) J Chem Phys 118:798110.1063/1.1565319 ↗
10. Gündüz M, Hunt JD (1985) Acta Metall 33/9:651
11. Gündüz M, Hunt JD (1989) Acta Metall 37/7:839
12. Maraşlı N, Hunt JD (1996) Acta Mater 44/3:108510.1016/1359-6454(95)00227-8 ↗
13. Keşlioğlu K, Maraşlı N (2004) Mater Sci Eng A 369:29410.1016/j.msea.2003.11.033 ↗
14. Keşlioğlu K, Maraşlı N (2004) Metall Mater Trans A 35A:366510.1007/s11661-004-0272-8 ↗
15. Keşlioğlu K, Gündüz M, Kaya H, Çadırlı E (2004) Mater Lett 58:306710.1016/j.matlet.2004.05.044 ↗
16. Erol M, Maraşlı N, Keşlioğlu K, Gündüz M (2004) Scripta Mater 51:13110.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.03.041 ↗
17. Keşlioğlu K, Erol M, Maraşlı N, Gündüz M (2004) J Alloy Compd 385:20710.1016/j.jallcom.2004.05.010 ↗
18. Bayender B, Maraşlı N, Çadırlı E, Şişman H, Gündüz M (1998) J Cryst Growth 194/1:11910.1016/S0022-0248(98)00533-8 ↗
19. Bayender B, Maraşlı N, Çadırlı E, Gündüz M (1999) Mater Sci Eng A 270:34310.1016/S0921-5093(99)00162-8 ↗
20. Maraşlı N, Keşlioğlu K, Arslan B (2003) J Cryst Growth 247:61310.1016/S0022-0248(02)02057-2 ↗
21. Witusiewicz VT, Sturz L, Hecht U, Rex S (2004) Acta Mater 52:456110.1016/j.actamat.2004.06.013 ↗
22. Derollez P, Lefebvre J, Descamps M, Press W, Fontaine H (1990) Condens Matter 2:689310.1088/0953-8984/2/33/002 ↗
23. Woodruff DP (1973) The solid–liquid interface. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 4