Giant exchange bias behavior and training effect in spin-glass-like NiCr2O4/NiO ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
NiCr2O4/NiO ceramic has been synthesized successfully through co-precipitation method to study the magnetic properties. Field cooling (FC) magnetic hysteresis loops measured at low temperature show significant shift in both coercive field and remnant magnetization. It has been plotted that the exchange bias (EB) field can be as large as 11.86 kOe at 10 K followed with an enhanced coercive field. The variation of EB field and shift of remnant magnetization after FC processes shows a regular tendency with increasing temperature and cooling field. Known as training effect, the EB behavior also presents a strong dependence on loop cycle. The cycle dependence of large EB field, vertical shift of magnetization, and coercive field at low temperature can be ascribed to the pinned spins in spin-glass-like (SGL) phase of the system interface. The SGL phase has been proved by Almeida–Thouless line and high field relaxation effect. The disorder structure is responsible for the frustration interface and the formation of SGL phase in the interface.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications · Multiferroics and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Meiklejohn WH, Bean CP (1956) New magnetic anisotropy. Phys Rev 102:1413–141410.1103/PhysRev.102.1413 ↗
2. Nogués J, Sort J, Langlais V, Skumryev V, Suriñach S, Muñoz JS, Baró MD (2005) Exchange bias in nanostructures. Phys Rep 422:65–11710.1016/j.physrep.2005.08.004 ↗
3. Giri S, Patra M, Majumdar S (2011) Exchange bias effect in alloys and compounds. J Phys 23:073201
4. Cabreira-Gomes R, Silva FG, Aquino R, Bonville P, Tourinho FA, Perzynski R, Depeyrot J (2014) Exchange bias of MnFe2O4@γFe2O3 and CoFe2O4@γFe2O3 core/shell nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 368:409–41410.1016/j.jmmm.2014.03.003 ↗
5. Ali K, Sarfraz AK, Ali A, Mumtaz A, Hasanain SK (2014) Temperature dependence magnetic properties and exchange bias effect in CuFe2O4 nanoparticles embedded in NiO matrix. J Magn Magn Mater 369:81–8510.1016/j.jmmm.2014.06.007 ↗
6. Lan CY, Jiang YW, Yang SG (2011) Magnetic properties of La and (La, Zr) doped BiFeO3 ceramics. J Mater Sci 46:734–738. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4805-910.1007/s10853-010-4805-9 ↗
7. Tracy JB, Weiss DN, Dinega DP, Bawendi MG (2005) Exchange biasing and magnetic properties of partially and fully oxidized colloidal cobalt nanoparticles. Phys Rev B 72:06440410.1103/PhysRevB.72.064404 ↗
8. Liu XH, Cui WB, Liu W, Zhao XG, Li D, Zhang ZD (2009) Exchange bias and phase transformation in α-Fe2O3/Fe3O4 nanocomposites. J Alloys Comp 475:42–4510.1016/j.jallcom.2008.07.097 ↗
9. López-Ortega A, Estrader M, Salazar-Alvarez G, Estradé S, Golosovsky IV et al (2012) Strongly exchange coupled inverse ferrimagnetic soft/hard, Mn x Fe3−x O4/Fe x Mn3−x O4, core/shell heterostructured nanoparticles. Nanoscale 4:5138–514710.1039/c2nr30986f ↗
10. Yalçın O, Ünlüer Ş, Kazan S, Şahingöz R (2015) Origin of the exchange bias training effects in magnetically coupled soft/hard synthetic bilayers at low temperature. Phys B 459:74–7810.1016/j.physb.2014.11.097 ↗
11. Chen YT, Jen SU, Yao YD, Wu JM, Liao JH, Wu TB (2008) Exchange biasing observed in the Co/Ir20Mn80 system. J Alloys Comp 448:59–6310.1016/j.jallcom.2006.12.099 ↗
12. Prejbeanu IL, Kerekes M, Sousa RC, Sibuet H, Redon O, Dieny B, Nozières JP (2007) Thermally assisted MRAM. J Phys 19:165218
13. Klemme S, Miltenburg JC (2002) Thermdynamic properties of nickel chromite (NiCr2O4) based on adiabatic calorimetry at low temperature. Phys Chem Miner 29:663–66710.1007/s00269-002-0280-4 ↗
14. Ptak M, Maczka M, Gagor A, Pikul A, Macalik L, Hanuza J (2013) Temperature-dependent XRD, IR, magnetic, SEM and TEM studies of Jahn–Teller distorted NiCr2O4 powders. J Solid State Chem 201:270–27910.1016/j.jssc.2013.03.023 ↗
15. Tomiyasu K, Hiraka H, Ohoyama K, Yamada K (2008) Resonance-like magnetic excitations in spinel ferrimagnetic FeCr2O4 and NiCr2O4 observed by neutron scattering. J Phys Soc Jpn 77:12470310.1143/JPSJ.77.124703 ↗
16. Mantlikova A, Vejpravova JP, Holec P, Plocek J, Niznansky D (2011) Magnetic properties of TCr2O4 (T = Co, Ni) fine powders and TCr2O4/SiO2 nanocomposites. IOP Conf Ser 18:03202210.1088/1757-899X/18/3/032022 ↗
17. Sabyasachi S, Majumdar S, Giri S (2011) Nanocrystallite interface effect and exchange bias phenomenology in Cr2O3 and NiO nanoparticles. Solid State Commun 151:1515–151910.1016/j.ssc.2011.07.038 ↗
18. Tian ZM, Chen JT, Yuan SL, Tang JB, Huo SX, Duan HN (2011) Exchange bias effect in multiferroic CoCr2O4/Cr2O3 nanogranular system synthesized through a phase segregation route. J Appl Phys 110:05390710.1063/1.3632049 ↗
19. Su J, Zhang JT, Lu XM, Lu CJ, He J, Li QC, Zhou J, Zhu JS (2014) Magnetic and dielectric properties of metamagnetic TbCo0.5Mn0.5O3.07 ceramics. J Mater Sci 49:3681–3686. doi: 10.1007/s10853-014-8076-810.1007/s10853-014-8076-8 ↗
20. Rana R, Pandey P, Singh RP, Rana DS (2014) Positive exchange-bias and giant vertical hysteretic shift in La0.3Sr0.7FeO3/SrRuO3 bilayers. Sci Rep 4:413810.1038/srep04138 ↗
21. Nogués J, Leighton C, Schuller IK (2000) Correlation between antiferromagnetic interface coupling and positive exchange bias. Phys Rev B 61:1315–131710.1103/PhysRevB.61.1315 ↗
22. Ohldag H, Scholl A, Nolting F, Arenholz E, Maat S, Young AT, Carey M, Stöhr J (2003) Correlation between exchange bias and pinned interfacial spins. Phys Rev Lett 91:01720310.1103/PhysRevLett.91.017203 ↗
23. Zheng RK, Wen GH, Fung KK, Zhang XX (2004) Giant exchange bias and the vertical shifts of hysteresis loops in γ-Fe2O3-coated Fe nanoparticles. J Appl Phys 95:5244–524610.1063/1.1687987 ↗
24. Radu F, Etzkorn M, Siebrecht R, Schmitte T, Westerholt K, Zabel H (2003) Interfacial domain formation during magnetization reversal in exchange-biased CoO/Co bilayers. Phys Rev B 67:13440910.1103/PhysRevB.67.134409 ↗
25. Restrepo-Parra E, Orozco-Hernández G, Urrea-Serna J, Jurado JF, Vargas-Hernández JC, Riaño-Rojas JC, Restrepo J (2010) Interface roughness influence on exchange bias effect in La2/3Ca1/3MnO3/La1/3Ca2/3MnO3 bilayers. J Mater Sci 45:6763–6768. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4772-110.1007/s10853-010-4772-1 ↗
26. Binek C (2004) Training of the exchange-bias effect: a simple analytic approach. Phys Rev B 70:01442110.1103/PhysRevB.70.014421 ↗
27. Hoffmann A (2004) Symmetry driven irreversibilities at ferromagnetic-antiferromagnetic interfaces. Phys Rev Lett 93:09720310.1103/PhysRevLett.93.097203 ↗
28. Gredig T, Krivorotov IN, Dahlberg ED (2002) Magnetization reversal in exchange biased Co/CoO probed with anisotropic magnetoresistance. J Appl Phys 91:7760–776210.1063/1.1447181 ↗
29. Maity T, Goswami S, Bhattacharya D, Roy S (2013) Superspin glass mediated giant spontaneous exchange bias in a nanocomposite of BiFeO3-Bi2Fe4O9. Phys Rev Lett 110:10720110.1103/PhysRevLett.110.107201 ↗
30. Yoshii K (2011) Positive exchange bias from magnetization reversal in La1−x Pr x CrO3 (x ~ 0.7–0.85). Appl Phys Lett 99:14250110.1063/1.3644473 ↗