journal article·2019-04

Structure–property relationships of aramid fibers via X-ray scattering and atomic force microscopy

Michael R. Roenbeck, Julia Cline, Vincent Wu, Mehdi Afshari, Steve Kellner, Patrick Martin, Juan David Londono, Laura E. Clinger, David Reichert, Steven R. Lustig, Kenneth E. Strawhecker

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 54· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Real-space methods of characterizing high-performance fibers’ inherent morphologies will greatly enhance our understanding of the key structural features within fibers and their impacts on mechanical performance. Here, we report on structure–property correlations of two new classes of commercial DuPont Kevlar fibers, termed “K29 sample test” and “K49 sample test,” as well as conventional K29 and K49 fibers.* Through multifrequency atomic force microscope scans of internal fiber surfaces prepared by a focused ion beam notch technique, we directly capture nano- and microstructural features that define the inherent structures of these fibers. Integrating these findings with X-ray scattering experiments, we relate crystallographic and real-space measurements to each other, highlighting how multiscale structural motifs manifest within fibers. By carrying out tensile tests on single fibers drawn from the same tows, we also glean new insights into the structure–property relationships that dictate the mechanical behavior of these fibers.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Blades H (1975) High modulus, high tenacity poly (p-phenylene terephthalamide) fiber. US Patent 3869430
2. Dobb MG, Johnson DJ, Saville BP (1977) Supramolecular structure of a high-modulus polyaromatic fiber (Kevlar 49). J Polym Sci: Polym Phys Edn 15(12):2201–2211
3. Northolt M (1980) Tensile deformation of poly (p-phenylene terephthalamide) fibres, an experimental and theoretical analysis. Polymer 21(10):1199–120410.1016/0032-3861(80)90088-9 ↗
4. Rao Y, Waddon AJ, Farris RJ (2001) Structure–property relation in poly (p-phenylene terephthalamide)(PPTA) fibers. Polymer 42(13):5937–594610.1016/S0032-3861(00)00905-8 ↗
5. Morgan RJ, Pruneda CO, Steele WJ (1983) The relationship between the physical structure and the microscopic deformation and failure processes of poly (p-phenylene terephthalamide) fibers. J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys 21(9):1757–1783
6. Panar M et al (1983) Morphology of poly (p-phenylene terephthalamide) fibers. J Polym Sci: Polym Phys Edn 21(10):1955–1969
7. Chatzi E, Urban M, Koenig J (1986) Characterization of Kevlar fiber surfaces using a newly developed infrared photoacoustic technique. In: Macromolecular symposia. Wiley Online Library10.1002/masy.19860050111 ↗
8. Allen S, Roche E (1989) Deformation behaviour of Kevlar aramid fibres. Polymer 30(6):996–100310.1016/0032-3861(89)90069-4 ↗
9. Dobb MG, Robson RM (1990) Structural characteristics of aramid fibre variants. J Mater Sci 25(1):459–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0071405610.1007/BF00714056 ↗
10. Northolt M, Van Aartsen J (1977) Chain orientation distribution and elastic properties of poly (p‐phenylene terephthalamide), a “rigid rod” polymer. In: Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Symposia, Wiley Online Library10.1002/polc.5070580120 ↗
11. Krause S, Vezie D, Adams W (1989) Straightening of pleated sheet structure in fibres of poly (p-phenyleneterephthalamide)-Kevlar 149. Polym Commun 30(1):10–13
12. Stockdale TA et al (2016) A rapid FIB-notch technique for characterizing the internal morphology of high-performance fibers. Mater Lett 176:173–17610.1016/j.matlet.2016.04.082 ↗
13. Strawhecker KE et al (2016) Interior morphology of high-performance polyethylene fibers revealed by modulus mapping. Polymer 103:224–23210.1016/j.polymer.2016.09.062 ↗
14. Roenbeck MR et al (2017) Probing the internal structures of Kevlar fibers and their impacts on mechanical performance. Polymer 128(5):200–21010.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.039 ↗
15. Cline J, Wu V, Moy P (2018) Assessment of the Tensile properties for single fibers. US Army Research Laboratory, p 1–40
16. Wagner HD, Phoenix SL, Schwartz P (1984) A study of statistical variability in the strength of single aramid filaments. J Compos Mater 18(4):312–33810.1177/002199838401800402 ↗
17. Garcia R, Herruzo ET (2012) The emergence of multifrequency force microscopy. Nat Nanotechnol 7(4):21710.1038/nnano.2012.38 ↗
18. Garcia R, Proksch R (2013) Nanomechanical mapping of soft matter by bimodal force microscopy. Eur Polymer J 49(8):1897–190610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.03.037 ↗
19. Herruzo ET, Perrino AP, Garcia R (2014) Fast nanomechanical spectroscopy of soft matter. Nat Commun 5:312610.1038/ncomms4126 ↗
20. Labuda A et al (2016) Generalized Hertz model for bimodal nanomechanical mapping. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 7(1):970–98210.3762/bjnano.7.89 ↗
21. Kocun M et al (2017) Fast, high resolution, and wide modulus range nanomechanical mapping with bimodal tapping mode. ACS Nano 11(10):10097–1010510.1021/acsnano.7b04530 ↗
22. Rao Y, Waddon AJ, Farris RJ (2001) The evolution of structure and properties in poly (p-phenylene terephthalamide) fibers. Polymer 42(13):5925–593510.1016/S0032-3861(00)00906-X ↗
23. Wu T-M, Blackwell J (1996) Comparison of the axial correlation lengths and paracrystalline distortion for Technora and Kevlar aromatic polyamide fibers. Macromolecules 29(17):5621–562710.1021/ma951426e ↗
24. Naito K (2013) Tensile properties and weibull modulus of some high-performance polymeric fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 128(2):1185–119210.1002/app.38420 ↗
25. Riekel C et al (1999) X-ray microdiffraction study of chain orientation in poly (p-phenylene terephthalamide). Macromolecules 32(23):7859–786510.1021/ma990267m ↗
26. Graham JF et al (2000) Spatially resolved nanomechanical properties of Kevlar fibers. Polymer 41(12):4761–476410.1016/S0032-3861(99)00661-8 ↗
27. McAllister QP, Gillespie JW, VanLandingham MR (2012) Evaluation of the three-dimensional properties of Kevlar across length scales. J Mater Res 27(14):1824–183710.1557/jmr.2012.80 ↗
28. Sawyer LC et al (1993) The fibrillar hierarchy in liquid crystalline polymers. J Mater Sci 28(1):225–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0034905510.1007/BF00349055 ↗
29. Nakamae K, Nishino T, Airu X (1992) Poisson’s ratio of the crystal lattice of poly (p-phenylene terephthalamide) by X-ray diffraction. Polymer 33(23):4898–490010.1016/0032-3861(92)90038-X ↗
30. Dobb MG et al (1979) Microvoids in aramid-type fibrous polymers. Polymer 20(10):1284–128810.1016/0032-3861(79)90157-5 ↗
31. Dobb MG, Johnson DJ, Saville BP (1979) Structural aspects of high modulus aromatic polyamide fibres. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A: Math Phys Eng Sci 294(1411):483–48510.1098/rsta.1980.0057 ↗
32. Northolt M, Hout R (1985) Elastic extension of an oriented crystalline fibre. Polymer 26(2):310–31610.1016/0032-3861(85)90047-3 ↗
33. Allen S (1988) Stress-coupling phenomena in anisotropic fibres. Polymer 29(6):1091–109410.1016/0032-3861(88)90020-1 ↗
34. Deteresa S et al (1984) Compressive and torsional behaviour of Kevlar 49 fibre. J Mater Sci 19(1):57–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0240311110.1007/BF02403111 ↗
35. Knoff WF (1987) Relationship between the tensile and shear strength of aramid fibres. J Mater Sci Lett 6(12):1392–1394. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01689299.pdf10.1007/BF01689299.pdf ↗
36. Roche E et al (1985) Light diffraction effects from Kevlar aramid fibers. J Macromol Sci Phys 24(4):141–15710.1080/00222348508248022 ↗
37. Rogozinsky A, Bazhenov S (1992) Effect of creep on the Young’s modulus of aramid fibres. Polymer 33(7):1391–139810.1016/0032-3861(92)90112-A ↗
38. Beese AM et al (2014) Key factors limiting carbon nanotube yarn strength: exploring processing-structure-property relationships. ACS Nano 8(11):11454–1146610.1021/nn5045504 ↗
39. Crist B (1995) The ultimate strength and stiffness of polymers. Annu Rev Mater Sci 25(1):295–32310.1146/annurev.ms.25.080195.001455 ↗
40. Young RJ et al (1992) Relationship between structure and mechanical properties for aramid fibres. J Mater Sci 27(20):5431–5440. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0054160210.1007/BF00541602 ↗
41. Li S, McGhie A, Tang S (1994) Comparative study of the internal structures of Kevlar and spider silk by atomic force microscopy. J Vac Sci Technol A: Vac Surf Films 12(4):1891–189410.1116/1.578978 ↗
42. Şahin K et al (2018) Limiting role of crystalline domain orientation on the modulus and strength of aramid fibers. Polymer 140:96–10610.1016/j.polymer.2018.02.018 ↗