journal article·2007-01-31

Ageing effects on the nanoindentation response of sub-micrometric 3Y-TZP ceramics

Stefano Guicciardi, Takayoshi Shimozono, Giuseppe Pezzotti

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP) ceramics are used as prosthesis material in hip replacement in virtue of their strength, fracture toughness and biological compatibility [1–3]. A critical issue of the zirconia ceramics is the martensitic transformation from tetragonal to monoclinic (t fi m) phase, which can be triggered by mechanical stresses or humid environments [4]. This transformation leads to surface roughening [5], microcraking and grain pullout [6, 7]. Moreover, the presence of monoclinic zirconia changes the hardness of the prosthesis surface. In retrieved zirconia femoral heads, it was reported that the nanoindentation hardness decreased with the increase of the monoclinic phase content [8]. The t fi m transformation is not an issue limited to bulk zirconia ceramics as it was also observed in alumina–zirconia composites [9]. Since one of the most important factors affecting the nucleation and growth of the t fi m transformation is the grain size [4], in this work the surface mechanical response, specifically hardness and Young’s modulus, of two thermally aged 3Y-TZP ceramics with different grain size is evaluated by depth-sensing indentation tests. Ageing treatments have been shown to replicate the same t fi m transformation effects observed in retrieved prostheses [10] and the assessment of the surface mechanical behaviour can give useful information about the wear and contact properties of these aged ceramics. Two 3 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics (3Y-TZP) were obtained starting from two different commercial powders (Kyocera, Japan). They were both mixed with 0.3 mol% of Al2O3, CIPed and HIPed. The final densities were almost 100% of the theoretical one and the mean grain sizes were 0.7 lm and 0.2 lm, respectively. In the following, these ceramics will be labelled as ZR07 and ZR02. Samples were cut, machined and polished. The ageing treatments were carried out in autoclave at 121 C with a water vapour pressure of 0.235 MPa for different times: 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 h. For each ageing time, one sample for each material was used. The depth-sensing indentation tests were carried out using a Berkovich diamond tip on a commercial nanoindenter (Nano Indenter XP, MTS Systems Corporation, Oak Ridge, TN, USA). Four peak loads were used to investigate the indentation hardness and Young’s modulus as a function of penetration depth: 10, 100, 200 and 400 mN. In each sample, at least 10 indentations were made at each peak load. Indentation hardness (H) and Young’s modulus (E) were calculated by the data acquisition software of the nanoindenter (TestWorksTM ver. 4.06A) based on the model of Oliver and Pharr [11]. For the Young’s modulus calculation, a Poisson ratio of 0.32 [12] was considered. The experimental data were statistically scrutinized by ANOVA [13]. As a deeper characterization of the nanoindentation response of these ceramics in un-aged state was S. Guicciardi (&) CNR-ISTEC, Institute of Science and Technology for Ceramics, Via Granarolo 64, I-48018 Faenza, Italy e-mail: stefano@istec.cnr.it
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Green DJ, Hannink RH, Swain MV (1989) In: Transformation toughening of ceramics. CRC Press, Boca Raton
2. Piconi C, Burger W, Richter HG, Cittadini A, Maccauro G, Covacci V, Bruzzese N, Ricci GA, Marmo E (1998) Biomaterials 19:148910.1016/S0142-9612(98)00064-7 ↗
3. Piconi C, Maccauro G (1999) Biomaterials 20:110.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-6 ↗
4. Lawson S (1995) J Eur Ceram Soc 15:48510.1016/0955-2219(95)00035-S ↗
5. Chevalier J, Cales B, Drouin JM (1999) J Am Ceram Soc 82:215010.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02055.x ↗
6. Lilley E (1990) In: Tressler RE, McNallen M (eds) Ceramics transactions, vol 10. American Ceramic Society, Westerville, Ohio, p 387
7. Zhu WZ, Zang XB (1999) Scr Mater 10:122910.1016/S1359-6462(99)00113-X ↗
8. Catledge SA, Cook M, Vohra YK, Santos EM, Mcclenny MD, Moore KD (2003) J Mater Sci Mater Med 14:86310.1023/A:1025678525474 ↗
9. Pecharromán C, Bartolomé JF, Requena J, Moya JS, Deville S, Chevalier J, Fantozzi G, Torrecillas R (2003) Adv Mater 15:50710.1002/adma.200390117 ↗
10. Chevalier J (2006) Biomaterials 27:53510.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.034 ↗
11. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) J Mater Res 7:156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
12. Ma Y, Kisi EH, Kennedy SJ (2001) J Am Ceram Soc 84:39910.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00668.x ↗
13. Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (1978) In: Statistics for experimenters: an introduction to design, data analysis, and model building. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA, p 165
14. Guicciardi S, Shimozono T, Pezzotti G Adv Eng Mater (accepted for publication)
15. Pezzotti G (2005) Anal Bioanal Chem 381:57710.1007/s00216-004-2780-1 ↗
16. Tsukuma K, Kubota Y, Tsukidate T (1984) In: Claussen N, Ruhle M, Heuer AH (eds) Advances in ceramics vol 12, science and technology of zirconia II. The American Ceramic Society, Inc., Columbus, Ohio, p 382
17. Ingel RP, Lewis D, Bender BA, Rice RW (1984) Adv Ceram 12:408
18. Din S-U, Kaleem A (1998) Mater Chem Phys 53:4810.1016/S0254-0584(97)02057-9 ↗
19. Bull SJ (2005) J Phys D Appl Phys 38:R39310.1088/0022-3727/38/24/R01 ↗
20. Schmauder S, Schubert H (1986) J Am Ceram Soc 69:53410.1111/j.1151-2916.1986.tb04789.x ↗
21. Nakajima K, Kobayashi K, Murata Y (1984) In: Claussen N, Ruhle M, Heuer AH (eds) Advances in ceramics vol 12, science and technology of zirconia II. The American Ceramic Society, Inc., Columbus, Ohio, p 399
22. Lawson S, Dransfield GP, Jones AG, McColgan P, Rainforth WM (1995) In: Ceramics: charting the future. Advances in Science and Technology, 3. Proceedings of the World Ceramics Congress, part of the 8th CIMTEC-World Ceramics Congress and Forum on New Materials, held in Florence Italy on June 20–July 4, 1994. TECHNA Srl, Faenza, Italy, p 899
23. Chan S-K, Fang Y, Grimsditch M, Li Z, Nevitt MV, Robertson WM, Zouboulis ES (1991) J Am Ceram Soc 74:174210.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07177.x ↗
24. Johnson KL (1985) In: Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 17110.1017/CBO9781139171731 ↗