Microstructural evolution of a Ti-4.5Al-3Mo-1V alloy during hot working
Source abstract
Abstract
The study investigated the variation of microstructure of a Ti-4.5AL-3Mo-1V alloy during hot compressing in α + β phase field. By scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), we systematically examined the influences of hot working parameters on the microstructural features including of the morphology of α grain, volume fraction of α phase and dynamic recrystallization (DRX). The experimental evidence showed that both α and β phases underwent DRX under the experimental conditions. Moreover, the recrystallization degree of α phase was more sufficient than that of β phase. The DRX was accelerated with increase of deformation temperature and decrease of strain rate. It was also noted that a certain degree of the (α → β) phase transformation occurred concurrently with the mechanical deformation. In accordance with the microstructural evolution, flow curves of the alloy were characterized by a linear increase until regular oscillations at high strain rates or single peak at low strain rates and softening was followed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. MITSUO NIINOMI, Sci. Tech. Adv. Mater. 4 (2003) 445.10.1016/j.stam.2003.09.002 ↗
2. D. M. GORDIN, T. GLORIANT, G. TEXIER and I. THIBON, J. Mater. Sci. 15 (2004) 885.
3. W. J. EVANS, Mater. Sci. Eng. A243 (1998) 89.10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00784-3 ↗
4. JI ZHANG and ZHIHONG ZHANG, Intermetallics. 8 (2000) 321.10.1016/S0966-9795(99)00078-3 ↗
5. L. X. LI and Y. LOU, Mater and Design. 20 (2002) 451.
6. R. M. MILLER and T. R. BIELER, Scripta Mater. 40 (1999) 1387.10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00061-5 ↗
7. C. HUANG and JOSEPH K. L. LAI, J. Mater. Proce. Tech. 73 (1998) 119.10.1016/S0924-0136(97)00220-3 ↗
8. G. LÜ TJERING, Mater. Sci. Eng. A243 (1998) 32.10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00778-8 ↗
9. GUOXIN CAO and LIANFENG FU, Intermetallics. 8 (2000) 647.10.1016/S0966-9795(99)00128-4 ↗
10. F. PERDRIX and M. F. TRICHET, ibid. 9 (2001) 807.10.1016/S0966-9795(01)00066-8 ↗
11. DIRK OSTWALDT and PETER KLIMANEK, Mater. Sci. Eng. A234–236 (1997) 810.10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00305-5 ↗
12. T. TAKASUGI and Y. WATANABE, Scripta Mater.. 43 (2000) 485.10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00447-4 ↗
13. TAKU SAKAI, J. Mater. Proc. Tech., 53 (1995) 349.10.1016/0924-0136(95)01992-N ↗
14. R. FILIP and K. KUBIAK, ibid. 133 (2003) 84.10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00248-0 ↗
15. S. L. SEMIATIN and T. R. BIELER, Acta Mater. 49 (2001) 3565.10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00236-1 ↗
16. LI MIAOQUAN and XIONG AIMING, Mater. Charact. 49 (2003) 203.
17. R. DING and Z. X. GUO, Mater. Sci. Eng. A365 (2004) 172.10.1016/j.msea.2003.09.024 ↗
18. T. SESHACHARYULU and B. DUTTA, Scripta Mater. 46 (2002) 673.10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00051-9 ↗