Effect of bonding variables on TLP bonding of oxide dispersion strengthened superalloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Transient liquid phase (TLP) bonding has evolved as a successful alternative joining technique for high service temperature components (e.g., vanes and blades for aircraft gas turbine engines) made from superalloys when neither fusion welding nor solid-state bonding techniques are successful. However, study shows that the optimization of bonding variables is critical to achieve a metallurgically sound joint free from deleterious intermetallic constituents in the joint region. In this study, the influence of bonding pressure and interlayer thickness on microstructural developments at the joint region of TLP bonded oxide dispersion strengthened (ODS) superalloy MA758 was examined. A commercial interlayer based on the Ni–Cr–B (MBF-80) system was used and results showed that bonding pressure and interlayer thickness affected the final width of the joints. A theoretical study revealed that the TLP bonding time can also be reduced when there is an increase in bonding pressure.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Shirzadi AA, Wallach ER (1999) Acta Metall 47:3551
2. Shoemaker LE (1986) In: David SA (ed) Proceedings of the International Conference on Trends in Welding Research, Gatlinburg, Tennessee, USA, May 1986, ASM International, p 371
3. Lugscheider E, Schmoor H, Eritt U (1995) In: Proceedings of the International Conference on High Temperature Brazing and Diffusion Welding, Deutscher Verlag fur Schweisstechnik, GmbH, Dusseldorf, Germany, p 259
4. Su CY, Chou CP, Chang WJ, Liu MH (2000) Mater Engg Perf 9:66310.1361/105994900770345539 ↗
5. Saha RK, Wei S, Khan TI (2005) Mater Sci Engg A 406:31910.1016/j.msea.2005.07.002 ↗
6. Rabinkin A, Pounds S (1988) Weld J 67:33
7. Yeh MS, Chuang TH (1997) Metall Mater Trans A 28A:136710.1007/s11661-997-0273-5 ↗
8. Li Z, Fearis W, North TH (1995) Mater Sci Tech 11:36310.1179/mst.1995.11.4.363 ↗
9. Tuah-Poku I, Dollar M, Massalski TB (1988) Metall Trans A 19A:67510.1007/BF02649282 ↗
10. Khan TI, Wallach ER (1996) Mater Sci Tech 12:60310.1179/mst.1996.12.7.603 ↗
11. Zhou Y (2001) J Mater Sci Lett 20:84110.1023/A:1010914813875 ↗
12. Ojo OA, Richerds NL, Chaturvedi MC (2004) Sci Tech Weld Join 9:53210.1179/174329304X8702 ↗
13. Massalski TB (ed) (1986) Binary alloy phase diagram. ASM, Metals Park, OH, p 366
14. Kucera J, Buchal A, Rek A, Stransky K (1984) Kovove Mater 22:250