journal article·2012-04

Optimizing the hot-forging process parameters for connecting rods made of PM titanium alloy

J. W. Qiu, Y. Liu, B. Liu, Y. B. Liu, B. Wang, Earle Ryba, H. P. Tang

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 47· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

In order to optimize the processing parameters of a new low-cost titanium alloy connecting rod made of powder forging, the deformation behavior of an α + β type Ti–1.5Fe–2.25Mo (wt%) alloy produced by elemental powder metallurgy (PM) route was studied using isothermal compression tests. The constitutive equations and a processing map were established to characterize the flow behavior and predict the optimum deformation parameters. The calculated apparent activation energy was 257.73 kJ/mol for deformation in the α + β phase region and 378.01 kJ/mol in the β phase region. Two deformation mechanism domains were found: α + β → β phase transformation and dynamic recrystallization. The results show that the optimum deformation parameters for the present alloy are (700–800 °C, 10−1.7–1 s−1) and (800–900 °C, 10−2–10 s−1). Based on these results, a finite element method (FEM) simulation of the hot-forming of a connecting rod was conducted, and the simulated results have been successfully used in an industrial forging of the connecting rod.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Lutjering G, Williams JC (eds) (2003) Titanium, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
2. Zhang XY, Li MQ, Li H, Luo J, Su SB, Wang H (2010) Mater Des 31:285110.1016/j.matdes.2009.12.051 ↗
3. Chen H-q, Cao C-x, Guo L, Lin H (2008) Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 18:102110.1016/S1003-6326(08)60175-2 ↗
4. Balasubrahmanyam VV, Prasad YVRK (2002) Mater Sci Eng A 336:15010.1016/S0921-5093(01)01982-7 ↗
5. Takemasu T, Vazquez V, Painter B, Altan T (1996) J Mater Process Technol 59:9510.1016/0924-0136(96)02290-X ↗
6. Wei W (2003) Powder Metallurgy Research Institute. Central South University, Changsha
7. Liu Y, Chen LF, Tang HP, Liu CT, Liu B, Huang BY (2006) Mater Sci Eng A 418:2510.1016/j.msea.2005.10.057 ↗
8. Yu M, Luo Y, Peng X, Qin Y (2006) Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 16:67110.1016/S1003-6326(06)60275-6 ↗
9. Liu B, Li YP, Matsumoto H et al (2010) Mater Sci Eng A 527:473310.1016/j.msea.2010.04.003 ↗
10. Zhang W, Liu Y, Li HZ, Li Z, Wang H, Liu B (2009) J Mater Process Technol 209:536310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.04.006 ↗
11. Prasad YVRK, Seshacharyulu T (1998) Int Mater Rev 43:24310.1179/095066098790105618 ↗
12. Ziegler H (ed) (1963) Progress in solid mechanics. Wiley, New York
13. Zener C, Hollomon JH (1944) J Appl Phys 15:2210.1063/1.1707363 ↗
14. Shi H, Mclaren AJ, Sellars CM (1997) Mater Sci Technol 13:21010.1179/mst.1997.13.3.210 ↗
15. Meiyan Z (2005) The researches on deformation and fracture behaviors of porous materials prepared by spray deposition during compression and rolling. Hunan University, Changsha
16. Ma F, Lu W, Qin J, Zhang D (2006) Mater Sci Eng A 416:5910.1016/j.msea.2005.09.082 ↗
17. Xue Q, Meyers MA, Nesterenko VF (2002) Acta Mater 50:57510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00356-1 ↗
18. Li X, Lu SQ, Fu MW, Wang KL, Dong XJ (2010) J Mater Process Technol 210:37010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.09.026 ↗