Optimizing the hot-forging process parameters for connecting rods made of PM titanium alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
In order to optimize the processing parameters of a new low-cost titanium alloy connecting rod made of powder forging, the deformation behavior of an α + β type Ti–1.5Fe–2.25Mo (wt%) alloy produced by elemental powder metallurgy (PM) route was studied using isothermal compression tests. The constitutive equations and a processing map were established to characterize the flow behavior and predict the optimum deformation parameters. The calculated apparent activation energy was 257.73 kJ/mol for deformation in the α + β phase region and 378.01 kJ/mol in the β phase region. Two deformation mechanism domains were found: α + β → β phase transformation and dynamic recrystallization. The results show that the optimum deformation parameters for the present alloy are (700–800 °C, 10−1.7–1 s−1) and (800–900 °C, 10−2–10 s−1). Based on these results, a finite element method (FEM) simulation of the hot-forming of a connecting rod was conducted, and the simulated results have been successfully used in an industrial forging of the connecting rod.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Lutjering G, Williams JC (eds) (2003) Titanium, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
2. Zhang XY, Li MQ, Li H, Luo J, Su SB, Wang H (2010) Mater Des 31:285110.1016/j.matdes.2009.12.051 ↗
3. Chen H-q, Cao C-x, Guo L, Lin H (2008) Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 18:102110.1016/S1003-6326(08)60175-2 ↗
4. Balasubrahmanyam VV, Prasad YVRK (2002) Mater Sci Eng A 336:15010.1016/S0921-5093(01)01982-7 ↗
5. Takemasu T, Vazquez V, Painter B, Altan T (1996) J Mater Process Technol 59:9510.1016/0924-0136(96)02290-X ↗
6. Wei W (2003) Powder Metallurgy Research Institute. Central South University, Changsha
7. Liu Y, Chen LF, Tang HP, Liu CT, Liu B, Huang BY (2006) Mater Sci Eng A 418:2510.1016/j.msea.2005.10.057 ↗
8. Yu M, Luo Y, Peng X, Qin Y (2006) Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 16:67110.1016/S1003-6326(06)60275-6 ↗
9. Liu B, Li YP, Matsumoto H et al (2010) Mater Sci Eng A 527:473310.1016/j.msea.2010.04.003 ↗
10. Zhang W, Liu Y, Li HZ, Li Z, Wang H, Liu B (2009) J Mater Process Technol 209:536310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.04.006 ↗
11. Prasad YVRK, Seshacharyulu T (1998) Int Mater Rev 43:24310.1179/095066098790105618 ↗
12. Ziegler H (ed) (1963) Progress in solid mechanics. Wiley, New York
13. Zener C, Hollomon JH (1944) J Appl Phys 15:2210.1063/1.1707363 ↗
14. Shi H, Mclaren AJ, Sellars CM (1997) Mater Sci Technol 13:21010.1179/mst.1997.13.3.210 ↗
15. Meiyan Z (2005) The researches on deformation and fracture behaviors of porous materials prepared by spray deposition during compression and rolling. Hunan University, Changsha
16. Ma F, Lu W, Qin J, Zhang D (2006) Mater Sci Eng A 416:5910.1016/j.msea.2005.09.082 ↗
17. Xue Q, Meyers MA, Nesterenko VF (2002) Acta Mater 50:57510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00356-1 ↗
18. Li X, Lu SQ, Fu MW, Wang KL, Dong XJ (2010) J Mater Process Technol 210:37010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.09.026 ↗