journal article·2013-07Open access

Effect of initial notch orientation on fracture toughness in fail-safe steel

Tadanobu Inoue, Yuuji Kimura

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 48· Issue 13

Abstract

A 0.4C–2Si–1Cr–1Mo steel bar with an ultrafine-elongated grain (UFEG) structures was produced by multi-pass warm caliber rolling. The test sample was machined from the rolled bar with 0°, 45°, and 90° rotation along the rolling direction, and a static three-point bending test was conducted at ambient temperature. The toughness anisotropy on the steel with UFEG structures were studied, including the crack propagation on the basis of the microstructural features. The strength and toughness decreased with an increase in the rotation angle along the rolling direction. The toughness decreased drastically, compared to the strength. The notch orientation dependence on toughness is due to differences in the spatial distribution of weak sites such as {100} cleavage planes and boundaries of elongated grains. For the toughness design in ultrafine-grained materials, it is essential to understand the spatial distribution of these weak sites as well as the grain size.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Lu K (2010) Science 328:31910.1126/science.1185866 ↗
2. Launey ME, Ritchie RO (2009) Adv Mater 21:210310.1002/adma.200803322 ↗
3. Inoue T, Kimura Y, Ochiai S (2012) Sci Technol Adv Mater 13:03500510.1088/1468-6996/13/3/035005 ↗
4. Hohenwarter A, Kammerhofer C, Pippan R (2010) J Mater Sci 45(17):4805. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4635-910.1007/s10853-010-4635-9 ↗
5. Toker SM, Rubitschek F, Niendorf T, Canadinc C, Maier HJ (2012) Scripta Mater 66:43510.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.12.007 ↗
6. Kimura Y, Inoue T, Yin F, Tsuzaki K (2008) Science 320(5879):105710.1126/science.1156084 ↗
7. Nie Y, Kimura Y, Inoue T, Yin F, Akiyama E, Tsuzaki K (2012) Metall Mater Trans 43A:167010.1007/s11661-011-0974-7 ↗
8. Embury JD, Petch NJ, Wraith AE, Wright ES (1967) Trans Metall Soc AIME 239:114
9. She J, Inoue K, Ueno K (2000) J. Mater Sci Lett 19:4510.1023/A:1006799731065 ↗
10. Bourell DL (1983) Metall Trans A 14:248710.1007/BF02668890 ↗
11. Rao KTV, Ritchie RO (1989) Mater Sci Technol 5:88210.1179/mst.1989.5.9.882 ↗
12. Inoue T, Yin F, Kimura Y (2007) Mater Sci Eng 66A:11410.1016/j.msea.2007.02.098 ↗
13. ASTM E1820-01 (2005) Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, pp 1036–1081
14. Kimura Y, Inoue T, Yin F, Tsuzaki K (2010) ISIJ Int 50:15210.2355/isijinternational.50.152 ↗
15. Inoue T, Yin F, Kimura Y, Tsuzaki K, Ochiai S (2010) Metall Mater Trans 40A:34110.1007/s11661-009-0093-x ↗
16. Gilbert A, Hahn GT, Reid CN, Wilcox BA (1964) Acta Mater 12:75410.1016/0001-6160(64)90230-5 ↗
17. Ma H (1998) Int J Fract 89:14310.1023/A:1007484026645 ↗
18. Kameda J, Nishiyama Y (2011) Mater Sci Eng 528A:370510.1016/j.msea.2011.01.018 ↗
19. Matsuda S, Kawashima Y, Sekiguchi S, Okamoto M (1982) Tetsu-to-Hagane 68:435 (in Japanese)10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.68.3_435 ↗
20. Dieter GE (1988) Mechanical metallurgy SI metric edition. McGraw-Hill Book Co, Singapore, pp 265–268