Modelling of carrot tissue as a fluid-filled foam
Source abstract
Abstract
Experimental values of the stiffness of carrot tissue were compared with the predictions from models of fluid-filled closed cell foams. Compared to an experimental value of 7 MPa for fresh carrot, predictions gave moduli in the range 2 to 33 MPa based on a compressible fluid, an isotonic state turgor pressure of 0.8 MPa, a cell wall modulus of 100 MPa and cell lengths from 54 to 3 times the wall thickness. The modulus was predicted to increase linearly with turgor pressure in agreement with experiment for turgor pressures up to about 1 MPa, whereafter the experimental modulus increased more sharply, reaching a value of 14 MPa at a turgor pressure of 2.1 MPa, closer to the predicted rate of increase in an earlier shell model. Predictions based on an incompressible fluid gave initial and equilibrium moduli of 14 and 2 MPa, respectively, in agreement with the experimental values at high and low levels of turgor, again assuming a cell wall modulus of 100 MPa but requiring small cells of length ratio less than three times their wall thickness.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Plant Surface Properties and Treatments · Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. R. L. Jackman and D. W. Stanley, Trends Food Sci. Tech. 6 (1995) 187.10.1016/S0924-2244(00)89053-6 ↗
2. K. W. Waldron, A. C. Smith, A. J. Parr, A. Ng and M. L. Parker, ibid. 8 (1997) 213.10.1016/S0924-2244(97)01052-2 ↗
3. S. B. Nilsson, C. H. Hertz and S. Falk, Physiol. Plant. 11 (1958) 818.10.1111/j.1399-3054.1958.tb08275.x ↗
4. R. E. Pitt, Trans. Amer. Soc. Agric. Engrs. 25 (1982) 1776.10.13031/2013.33805 ↗
5. E. Kimmel, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 34 (1992) 809.10.1016/0020-7403(92)90044-H ↗
6. L. J. Gibson and M. F. Ashby, “Cellular Solids, Structure and Properties” (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997).10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
7. K. Rajan, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 4 (1985) 609.10.1007/BF00720046 ↗
8. A.-L. Hayter and A. C. Smith, J. Mater. Sci. 23 (1988) 736.10.1007/BF01174714 ↗
9. G. E. Attenburrow, R. M. Goodband, L. J. Taylor and P. J. Lillford, J. Cereal Sci. 9 (1989) 61.10.1016/S0733-5210(89)80024-4 ↗
10. S. K. Maiti, L. J. Gibson and M. F. Ashby, Acta. Metall. 32 (1984) 1963.10.1016/0001-6160(84)90177-9 ↗
11. L. J. Gibson, M. F. Ashby and K. E. Easterling, J. Mater. Sci 23 (1988) 3041.10.1007/BF00551271 ↗
12. K. J. Niklas, Amer. J. Bot. 76 (1989) 929.10.1002/j.1537-2197.1989.tb15071.x ↗
13. J. F. V. Vincent, J. Sci. Food Agric. 47 (1989) 443.10.1002/jsfa.2740470406 ↗
14. M. Warner and S. F. Edwards, Europhys. Lett. 5 (1988) 623.10.1209/0295-5075/5/7/009 ↗
15. A. J. Downie, D. M. R. Georget, A. C. Smith and K. W. Waldron, Food Sci. Technol. 30 (1997) 312.
16. P. J. Kramer and J. S. Boyer, “Water Relations of Plants and Soils” (Academic Press, San Diego, USA, 1995).
17. T.-T. Lin and R. E. Pitt, J. Texture Stud. 17 (1986) 291.10.1111/j.1745-4603.1986.tb00554.x ↗
18. A. McGarry, J. Hort. Sci. 68 (1993) 431.10.1080/00221589.1993.11516370 ↗
19. R. E. Pitt and H. L. Chen, Trans. Amer. Soc. Agric. Engrs. 26 (1983) 1275.10.13031/2013.34116 ↗
20. R. L. Jackman, A. G. Marangoni and D. W. Stanley, J. Texture Stud. 23 (1992) 491.10.1111/j.1745-4603.1992.tb00036.x ↗
21. S. V. Ramana and A. J. Taylor, J. Sci. Food Agric. 64 (1994) 519.10.1002/jsfa.2740640419 ↗
22. A. M. Rojas, M. A. Castro, S. M. Alzamora and L. N. Gerschenson, J. Food Sci. 66 (2001) 111.10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.tb15591.x ↗
23. Q. Gao and R. E. Pitt, Trans. Amer. Soc. Agric. Engrs. 34 (1991) 232.10.13031/2013.31651 ↗
24. M. Fuchigami, N. Hyakumoto and K. Miyazaki, J. Food Sci. 60 (1995) 137.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1995.tb05623.x ↗
25. A. McGarry, Ann. Bot. 75 (1995) 157.10.1006/anbo.1995.1007 ↗
26. N. C. Carpita, Plant Physiol. 79 (1985) 485.10.1104/pp.79.2.485 ↗
27. G. PrÉstamo, C. Fuster and M. C. RisueÑo, J. Sci. Food Agric. 77 (1998) 223.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199806)77:2<223::AID-JSFA29>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
28. M. Fuchigami, K. Miyazaki and N. Hyakumoto, J. Food Sci. 60 (1995) 132.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1995.tb05622.x ↗
29. B. L. Thiel and A. M. Donald, J. Text. Studies 31 (2000) 437.10.1111/j.1745-4603.2000.tb00301.x ↗
30. D. M. R. Georget, A. Ng, A. C. Smith and K. W. Waldron, J. Sci. Food Agric. 78 (1998) 73.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199809)78:1<73::AID-JSFA89>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
31. S. Hiller, D. M. Bruce and G. Jeronimidis, J. Texture Stud. 27 (1996) 559.10.1111/j.1745-4603.1996.tb00094.x ↗
32. D. R. Coffin, M. L. Fishman and T. V. Ly, J. Appl. Poly. Sci. 61 (1996) 71.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960705)61:1<71::AID-APP8>3.0.CO;2-R ↗
33. G. A. Toole, P. A. Gunning, M. L. Parker, A. C. Smith and K. W. Waldron, Planta 212 (2001) 606.10.1007/s004250000425 ↗
34. E. M. Ahmed, S. Mirza and A. G. Arreola, J. Food Qual. 14 (1991) 321.10.1111/j.1745-4557.1991.tb00073.x ↗
35. N. N. Mohsenin, J. Texture Stud. 8 (1977) 169.10.1111/j.1745-4603.1977.tb01174.x ↗
36. B. E. Verlinden, T. de Barsy, J. De Baerdemaeker and R. Deltour, ibid. 27 (1996) 15.10.1111/j.1745-4603.1996.tb00057.x ↗
37. M. Nielsen and H. J. Martens, J. Food Sci. 62 (1997) 1167.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1997.tb12237.x ↗