journal article·2016-02

Multiscale modeling of sensory properties of Co–Ni–Al shape memory particles embedded in an Al metal matrix

V. Yamakov, J. D. Hochhalter, W. P. Leser, J. E. Warner, J. A. Newman, G. P. Purja Pun, Y. Mishin

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 51· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The concept of utilizing ferromagnetic shape memory alloys as embedded sensory particles in aluminum alloys for damage detection is discussed. When embedded in a material, a shape memory particle can undergo an acoustically detectable solid-state phase transformation when the local strain reaches a critical value. The emitted acoustic signal can be used for real-time damage detection. To study the transition behavior of the sensory particle inside a metal matrix under load, a simulation approach based on a coupled atomistic-continuum model is used. The simulation results indicate a strong dependence of the particle’s pseudoelastic response on its crystallographic orientation with respect to the loading direction. These results serve as a basis for understanding the efficacy and variability in the sensory particle transformation to detect damage processes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Wallace TA, Smith SW, Piascik RS, Horne MR, Messick PL, Alexa JA, Glaessgen EH, Hailer BT (2010) Strain-detecting composite materials. Patent application publication, Pub. No. US2010/0190026 A1, 29 July 2010
2. NIST Interatomic Potentials Repository. http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/
3. Purja Pun GP, Mishin Y (2009) Development of an interatomic potential for the Ni–Al system. Philos Mag 89:3245–326710.1080/14786430903258184 ↗
4. Mishin Y (2004) Atomistic modeling of the γ and γ′ phases of the Ni-Al system. Acta Mater 52:1451–146710.1016/j.actamat.2003.11.026 ↗
5. Mishin Y, Farkas D, Mehl MJ, Papaconstantopoulos DA (1999) Interatomic potentials for monoatomic metals from experimental data and ab initio calculations. Phys Rev B 59:3393–340710.1103/PhysRevB.59.3393 ↗
6. Purja Pun GP, Mishin Y (2012) Embedded-atom potential for hcp and fcc cobalt. Phys Rev B 86:13411610.1103/PhysRevB.86.134116 ↗
7. Frenkel D, Smit B (2002) Understanding molecular simulation: from algorithms to applications, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego
8. Karaca HE, Karaman I, Lagoudas DC, Maier HJ, Chumlyakov YI (2003) Recoverable stress-induced martensitic transformation in a ferromagnetic CoNiAl alloy. Scripta Mater 49:831–83610.1016/S1359-6462(03)00470-6 ↗
9. Mayer D, Maier HJ, Dadda J, Karaman I, Karaca HE (2006) Thermally and stress-induced martensitic transformation in Co-Ni-Al ferromagnetic shape memory alloy single crystals. Mat Sci Eng A 438–440:875–87810.1016/j.msea.2006.05.038 ↗
10. Parrinello M, Rahman A (1981) Polymorphic transitions in single crystals; a new molecular dynamics method. J Appl Phys 52:7182–719010.1063/1.328693 ↗
11. Cormier J, Rickman JM, Delph TJ (2001) Stress calculation in atomistic simulations of perfect and imperfect solids. J Appl Phys 89:99–10410.1063/1.1328406 ↗
12. Plimpton S, Battaile C, Chandross M, Holm L, Thompson A, Tikare V, Wagner G, Webb E, Zhou X, Cardona CG, Slepoy A (2009) Crossing the mesoscale no-man’s land via parallel kinetic Monte Carlo. Technical Report p. 85, Sandia Technical Report SAND2009-6226
13. Sadigh B, Erhart P, Stukowski A, Caro A, Martinez E, Zepeda-Ruiz L (2012) Scalable parallel Monte Carlo algorithm for atomistic simulations of precipitation in alloys. Phys Rev B 85:18420310.1103/PhysRevB.85.184203 ↗
14. Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B (2000) Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures. Wiley, New York, p 300
15. Saether E, Yamakov V, Glaessgen EH (2009) An embedded statistical coupling method for coupling molecular dynamics with finite element analyses. Int J Numer Methods Eng 78:1292–131910.1002/nme.2529 ↗
16. Yamakov V, Warner DH, Zamora RJ, Saether E, Curtin WA, Glaessgen EH (2014) Investigation of crack tip dislocation emission in aluminum using multiscale molecular dynamics simulation and continuum modeling. J Mech Phys Solids 65:35–5310.1016/j.jmps.2013.12.009 ↗
17. Nose S (1984) A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics method. J Chem Phys 81:511–51910.1063/1.447334 ↗
18. Stukowski A (2010) Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO-the Open Visualization Tool. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 18:01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
19. Clarke AS, Jonsson H (1993) Structural changes accompanying densification of random hard-sphere packings. Phys Rev E 47:397510.1103/PhysRevE.47.3975 ↗
20. Henderson A (2012) ParaView guide, a parallel visualization application. Kitware Inc., New york. ISBN-13:978-1-1930934-24-5, p. 506