Interfacial interaction-induced temperature-dependent mechanical property of graphene-PDMS nanocomposite
Source abstract
Abstract
Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and graphene-PDMS nanocomposites (GP) have been widely studied because of their excellent properties, of which the elastic modulus is very important for various applications. Here, the dependence of the elastic modulus of properly cured PDMS and GP on the temperature has been investigated. For both PDMS and GP, a critical temperature (Tc) has been found, which originates from the strong affinity of PDMS chains to the PDMS network and graphene sheet, as suggested by molecular dynamics simulation. Graphene inhibits the cross-linking of PDMS close to its surface, which leads to the reduced elastic modulus of GP (EGP). Only when the temperature is above Tc, EGP increases with temperature. This is the result of the entropy elasticity of PDMS and the re-initiated cross-linking of PDMS. However, the elastic moduli of PDMS and GP are independent of the temperature below Tc. Here, the study provides a guideline for the preparation and using of PDMS and its composite at various temperatures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Jiang W, Niu D, Liu H et al (2014) Photoresponsive soft-robotic platform: biomimetic fabrication and remote actuation. Adv Funct Mater 24:7598–760410.1002/adfm.201402070 ↗
2. Hu Y, Wu G, Lan T, Zhao J, Liu Y, Chen W (2015) A graphene-based bimorph structure for design of high performance photoactuators. Adv Mater 27:7867–787310.1002/adma.201502777 ↗
3. Yan C, Wang J, Lee PS (2015) Stretchable graphene thermistor with tunable thermal index. ACS Nano 9:2130–213710.1021/nn507441c ↗
4. Zdrojek M, Bomba J, Łapińska A et al (2018) Graphene-based plastic absorber for total sub-terahertz radiation shielding. Nanoscale 10:13426–1343110.1039/C8NR02793E ↗
5. Boland CS, Khan U, Ryan G et al (2016) Sensitive electromechanical sensors using viscoelastic graphene–polymer nanocomposites. Science 354:1257–126010.1126/science.aag2879 ↗
6. Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Lin G, Ruoff RS, Hu N, Schaefer DW, Mark JE (2013) What factors control the mechanical properties of poly(dimethylsiloxane) reinforced with nanosheets of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane modified graphene oxide? Polymer 54:3605–361110.1016/j.polymer.2013.04.057 ↗
7. Zhao YH, Zhang YF, Bai SL (2016) High thermal conductivity of flexible polymer composites due to synergistic effect of multilayer graphene flakes and graphene foam. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 85:148–15510.1016/j.compositesa.2016.03.021 ↗
8. Wolf MP, Salieb-Beugelaar GB, Hunziker P (2018) PDMS with designer functionalities—properties, modifications strategies, and applications. Prog Polym Sci 83:97–13410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.06.001 ↗
9. Fang M, Zhang Z, Li J, Zhang H, Lu H, Yang Y (2010) Constructing hierarchically structured interphases for strong and tough epoxy nanocomposites by amine-rich graphene surfaces. J Mater Chem 20:9635–964310.1039/c0jm01620a ↗
10. Terrones M, Martín O, González M, Pozuelo J, Serrano B, Cabanelas JC, Vega-Díaz SM, Baselga J (2011) Interphases in graphene polymer-based nanocomposites: achievements and challenges. Adv Mater 23:5302–531010.1002/adma.201102036 ↗
11. Cao L, Wang Y, Dong P, Vinod S, Tijerina JT, Ajayan PM, Xu Z, Lou J (2016) Interphase induced dynamic self-stiffening in graphene-based polydimethylsiloxane nanocomposites. Small 12:3723–373110.1002/smll.201600170 ↗
12. Xue L, Sanz B, Luo A et al (2017) Hybrid surface patterns mimicking the design of the adhesive toe pad of tree frog. ACS Nano 11:9711–971910.1021/acsnano.7b04994 ↗
13. Guo Q, Luo Y, Liu J, Zhang X, Lu C (2018) A well-organized graphene nanostructure for versatile strain-sensing application constructed by a covalently bonded graphene/rubber interface. J Mater Chem C6:2139–2214
14. Jesson DA, Watts JF (2012) The interface and interphase in polymer matrix composites: effect on mechanical properties and methods for identification. Polym Rev 52:321–35410.1080/15583724.2012.710288 ↗
15. Li Q, Liu C, Lin YH, Liu L, Jiang K, Fan S (2015) Large-strain, multiform movements from designable electrothermal actuators based on large highly anisotropic carbon nanotube sheets. ACS Nano 9:409–41810.1021/nn505535k ↗
16. Wang W, Xiang C, Zhu Q, Zhong W, Li M, Yan K, Wang D (2018) Multistimulus responsive actuator with go and carbon nanotube/pdms bilayer structure for flexible and smart devices. ACS Appl Mater Int 10:27215–2722310.1021/acsami.8b08554 ↗
17. Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GHB et al (2006) Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442:282–28610.1038/nature04969 ↗
18. Papageorgiou DG, Kinloch IA, Young RJ (2017) Mechanical properties of graphene and graphene-based nanocomposites. Prog Mater Sci 90:75–12710.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.004 ↗
19. Wu ZS, Ren W, Gao L, Liu B, Jiang C, Cheng HM (2009) Synthesis of high-quality graphene with a pre-determined number of layers. Carbon 47:493–49910.1016/j.carbon.2008.10.031 ↗
20. Casiraghi C, Hartschuh A, Qian H et al (2009) Raman spectroscopy of graphene edges. Nano Lett 9:1433–144110.1021/nl8032697 ↗
21. Malard LM, Pimenta MA, Dresselhaus G, Dresselhaus MS (2010) Raman spectroscopy in graphene. Phys Rep 473:51–8710.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.003 ↗
22. Khan U, O’Neill A, Lotya M, De S, Coleman JN (2010) High-concentration solvent exfoliation of graphene. Small 6:864–87110.1002/smll.200902066 ↗
23. Wang Y, Yang R, Shi Z, Zhang L, Shi D, Wang E, Zhang G (2011) Super-elastic graphene ripples for flexible strain sensors. ACS Nano 5:3645–365010.1021/nn103523t ↗
24. Camino G, Lomakin SM, Lazzari M (2001) Polydimethylsiloxane thermal degradation. Part 1. Kinetic aspects. Polymer 42:2395–240210.1016/S0032-3861(00)00652-2 ↗
25. Zhang W, Srivastava I, Zhu YF, Picu CR, Koratkar NA (2009) Heterogeneity in epoxy nanocomposites initiates crazing: significant improvements in fatigue resistance and toughening. Small 5:1403–140710.1002/smll.200801910 ↗
26. Rafiee MA, Rafiee J, Srivastava I, Wang Z, Song H, Yu ZZ, Koratkar N (2010) Fracture and fatigue in graphene nanocomposites. Small 6:179–18310.1002/smll.200901480 ↗
27. Asi O (2008) Mechanical properties of glass–fiber reinforced epoxy composites filled with Al2O3 particles. J Reinf Plast Compos 28:2861–286710.1177/0731684408093975 ↗
28. Liang J, Huang Y, Zhang L, Wang Y, Ma Y, Guo T, Chen Y (2009) Molecular-level dispersion of graphene into poly(vinyl alcohol) and effective reinforcement of their nanocomposites. Adv Funct Mater 19:2297–230210.1002/adfm.200801776 ↗
29. Doi M, Edwards SF (1986) The theory of polymer dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York
30. Mark JE (2004) Some interesting things about polysiloxanes. Acc Chem Res 37:946–95310.1021/ar030279z ↗
31. Xue L, Pham JT, Iturri J, del Campo A (2016) Stick–slip friction of PDMS surfaces for bioinspired adhesives. Langmuir 32:2428–243510.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00513 ↗
32. Yilgör E, Yilgör I (2014) Silicone containing copolymers: synthesis, properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci 39:1165–119510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.11.003 ↗