Electrospun carbon nanofiber catalyst layers for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: fabrication and optimization
Source abstract
Abstract
Current polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell catalyst support in a form of carbon black is linked with poor Pt utilization, non-optimized triple-phase boundary, mass transport losses, non-uniform microstructure, and durability issues. Little improvement has been made in creating a novel catalyst support microstructure and design to address the challenges associated with the use of carbon blacks. Of particular importance is the ability to control the microstructure of the catalyst layer. There is a lack of fundamental understanding of the relationship between the well-controlled catalyst layer microstructure and fuel cell performance. As catalyst layers require a structure that offers large porosity and surface area, it is envisioned that electrospun nanofibers are an excellent choice, providing a number of structural parameters that could be controlled, i.e., porosity, fiber diameter, fiber alignment, layer thickness. In this work, the fabrication parameters of electrospun carbon nanofibers (CNF) are optimized by factorial design to target key membrane electrode assembly design criterion. Validation of the structural and material properties concludes that optimized CNF surpassed design targets, achieving ~ 80% porosity, ~ 30 S cm−1 in-plane electrical conductivity, and ~ 330 nm fiber diameter. The optimization reveals that CNF properties were successfully tailored and appear feasible as novel catalyst support. The results from the detailed and systematic design of experiments provide a basis for correlating the material and structural properties to key fuel cell performance factors.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Lv H, Li D, Strmcnik D et al (2016) Recent advances in the design of tailored nanomaterials for efficient oxygen reduction reaction. Nano Energy 29:149–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.00810.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.008 ↗
2. Tang S, Sun G, Qi J et al (2010) Review of new carbon materials as catalyst supports in direct alcohol fuel cells. Chin J Catal 31:12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(09)60034-610.1016/S1872-2067(09)60034-6 ↗
3. Wang Y, Wilkinson DP, Zhang J (2011) Noncarbon support materials for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell electrocatalysts. Chem Rev 111:7625–7651. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100060r10.1021/cr100060r ↗
4. Singh R, Awasthi R, Sharma C (2014) Review: an overview of recent development of platinum-based cathode materials for direct methanol fuel cells. Int J Electrochem Sci 9:5607–563910.1016/S1452-3981(23)08193-2 ↗
5. Smirnova A, Dong X, Hara H, Sammes NM (2006) New generation of catalyst layers for PEMFCs based on carbon aerogel supported Pt catalyst (CASPC). Fuel Cell Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-207-1_710.1007/1-84628-207-1_7 ↗
6. Antolini E (2009) Carbon supports for low-temperature fuel cell catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ 88:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.09.03010.1016/j.apcatb.2008.09.030 ↗
7. U.S. Department of Energy (2013) Fuel cell technologies office multi-year research, development, and demonstration plan, 3.4, pp. 1–58
8. Hacker V, Wallnöfer E, Baumgartner W et al (2005) Carbon nanofiber-based active layers for fuel cell cathodes—preparation and characterization. Electrochem Commun 7:377–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2005.02.00910.1016/j.elecom.2005.02.009 ↗
9. Antolini E, Gonzalez ER (2009) Polymer supports for low-temperature fuel cell catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen 365:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2009.05.04510.1016/j.apcata.2009.05.045 ↗
10. Bessel CA, Laubernds K, Rodriguez NM, Baker RTK (2001) Graphite nanofibers as an electrode for fuel cell applications. J Phys Chem B 105:1115–1118. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp003280d10.1021/jp003280d ↗
11. Calvillo L, Gangeri M, Perathoner S et al (2011) Synthesis and performance of platinum supported on ordered mesoporous carbons as catalyst for PEM fuel cells: effect of the surface chemistry of the support. Int J Hydrog Energy 36:9805–9814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.02310.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.023 ↗
12. Calvillo L, Lázaro MJ, García-Bordejé E et al (2007) Platinum supported on functionalized ordered mesoporous carbon as electrocatalyst for direct methanol fuel cells. J Power Sour 169:59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.01.04210.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.01.042 ↗
13. Calderón JC, Mahata N, Pereira MFR et al (2012) Pt–Ru catalysts supported on carbon xerogels for PEM fuel cells. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:7200–7211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.12.02910.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.12.029 ↗
14. Andersen SM, Borghei M, Lund P et al (2013) Durability of carbon nanofiber (CNF) and carbon nanotube (CNT) as catalyst support for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Solid State Ionics 231:94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2012.11.02010.1016/j.ssi.2012.11.020 ↗
15. O’Hayre R, Barnett DM, Prinz FB (2005) The triple phase boundary. J Electrochem Soc 152:A439. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.185105410.1149/1.1851054 ↗
16. Cai M, Ruthkosky MS, Merzougui B et al (2006) Investigation of thermal and electrochemical degradation of fuel cell catalysts. J Power Sour 160:977–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.03310.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.033 ↗
17. Borup R, Meyers J, Pivovar B et al (2007) Scientific aspects of polymer electrolyte fuel cell durability and degradation. Chem Rev 107:3904–3951. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr050182l10.1021/cr050182l ↗
18. Shao Y, Yin G, Gao Y (2007) Understanding and approaches for the durability issues of Pt-based catalysts for PEM fuel cell. J Power Sour 171:558–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.00410.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.004 ↗
19. Dicks AL (2006) The role of carbon in fuel cells. J Power Sour 156:128–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.05410.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.054 ↗
20. Sharma S, Pollet BG (2012) Support materials for PEMFC and DMFC electrocatalysts—a review. J Power Sour 208:96–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.01110.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.011 ↗
21. Zhang S, Yuan X-Z, Hin JNC et al (2009) A review of platinum-based catalyst layer degradation in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Power Sour 194:588–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.07310.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.073 ↗
22. Shao-Horn Y, Sheng WC, Chen S et al (2007) Instability of supported platinum nanoparticles in low-temperature fuel cells. Top Catal 46:285–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-007-9000-010.1007/s11244-007-9000-0 ↗
23. Sebastián D, Calderón JC, González-Expósito JA et al (2010) Influence of carbon nanofiber properties as electrocatalyst support on the electrochemical performance for PEM fuel cells. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:9934–9942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.00410.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.004 ↗
24. Yuan F, Ryu H (2004) The synthesis, characterization, and performance of carbon nanotubes and carbon nanofibres with controlled size and morphology as a catalyst support material for a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. Nanotechnology 15:S596–S602. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/15/10/01710.1088/0957-4484/15/10/017 ↗
25. Park J-HH, Ju Y-WW, Park S-HH et al (2009) Effects of electrospun polyacrylonitrile-based carbon nanofibers as catalyst support in PEMFC. J Appl Electrochem 39:1229–1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-009-9787-410.1007/s10800-009-9787-4 ↗
26. Li W, Waje M, Chen Z et al (2010) Platinum nanopaticles supported on stacked-cup carbon nanofibers as electrocatalysts for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Carbon N Y 48:995–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2009.11.01710.1016/j.carbon.2009.11.017 ↗
27. Kayarkatte MK, Delikaya Ö, Roth C (2017) Freestanding catalyst layers: a novel electrode fabrication technique for PEM fuel cells via electrospinning. ChemElectroChem 4:404–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.20160053010.1002/celc.201600530 ↗
28. Zhang W, Pintauro PN (2011) High-performance nanofiber fuel cell electrodes. Chemsuschem 4:1753–1757. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20110024510.1002/cssc.201100245 ↗
29. Álvarez G, Alcaide F, Miguel O et al (2011) Electrochemical stability of carbon nanofibers in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Electrochim Acta 56:9370–9377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2011.08.02210.1016/j.electacta.2011.08.022 ↗
30. Chan S, Jankovic J, Susac D, et al (2018) Electrospun carbon nanofiber catalyst layers for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: structure and performance. J Power Sour 392:239–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.00110.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.001 ↗
31. Chan S, Jankovic J, Saha MS, et al (2016) Electrospun carbon nanofiber based catalyst support for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. In: Society for the advancement of material and process engineering. SAMPE, Long Beach
32. Sukigara S, Gandhi M, Ayutsede J et al (2004) Regeneration of Bombyx mori silk by electrospinning. Part 2. Process optimization and empirical modeling using response surface methodology. Polymer (Guildf) 45:3701–3708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2004.03.05910.1016/j.polymer.2004.03.059 ↗
33. Saraf A, Lozier G, Haesslein A et al (2009) Fabrication of nonwoven coaxial fiber meshes by electrospinning. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 15:333–344. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2008.042210.1089/ten.tec.2008.0422 ↗
34. Nasouri K, Shoushtari AM, Mojtahedi MRM (2015) Evaluation of effective electrospinning parameters controlling polyvinylpyrrolidone nanofibers surface morphology via response surface methodology. Fibers Polym 16:1941–1954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-015-5263-410.1007/s12221-015-5263-4 ↗
35. Yamashita Y, Aoki N (2008) Carbonization conditions for electrospun nanofibre of polyacylonitrile copolymer. Indian J Fibre Text Res 33:345–353
36. Maitra T, Sharma S, Srivastava A et al (2012) Improved graphitization and electrical conductivity of suspended carbon nanofibers derived from carbon nanotube/polyacrylonitrile composites by directed electrospinning. Carbon N Y 50:1753–1761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.12.02110.1016/j.carbon.2011.12.021 ↗
37. Ko FK, Wan Y (2014) Introduction to nanofiber materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9781139021333 ↗
38. Panapoy M, Dankeaw A, Ksapabutr B (2008) Electrical conductivity of PAN-based carbon nanofibers prepared by electrospinning method. Thammasat Int J Sci Technol 13:11–17
39. Inagaki M, Yang Y, Kang F (2012) Carbon nanofibers prepared via electrospinning. Adv Mater 24:2547–2566. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20110494010.1002/adma.201104940 ↗
40. Rahaman MSA, Ismail AF, Mustafa A (2007) A review of heat treatment on polyacrylonitrile fiber. Polym Degrad Stab 92:1421–1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.03.02310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.03.023 ↗
41. Sahoo NG, Rana S, Cho JW et al (2010) Polymer nanocomposites based on functionalized carbon nanotubes. Prog Polym Sci 35:837–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.03.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.03.002 ↗
42. Yördem OS, Papila M, Menceloğlu YZ (2008) Effects of electrospinning parameters on polyacrylonitrile nanofiber diameter: an investigation by response surface methodology. Mater Des 29:34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2006.12.01310.1016/j.matdes.2006.12.013 ↗
43. Vaisman L, Wagner HD, Marom G (2006) The role of surfactants in dispersion of carbon nanotubes. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 128–130:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2006.11.00710.1016/j.cis.2006.11.007 ↗
44. Reneker DH, Yarin AL, Fong H, Koombhongse S (2000) Bending instability of electrically charged liquid jets of polymer solutions in electrospinning. J Appl Phys 87:4531–4547. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.37353210.1063/1.373532 ↗
45. Angammana CJ, Jayaram SH (2011) Analysis of the effects of solution conductivity on electrospinning process and fiber morphology. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 47:1109–1117. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2011.212743110.1109/TIA.2011.2127431 ↗
46. Weibull W (1939) The phenomenon of rupture in solids. Proc R Swedish Inst Eng Res 153:1–55
47. Ridge E, Kudenko D, Ridge E, Kudenko D (2006) Sequential experiment designs for screening and tuning parameters of stochastic heuristics. Workshop on empirical methods for the analysis of algorithms, REYKJAVIK, ICEL, pp 27–34
48. Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM (2016) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, 4th edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken
49. Huang L, Bui N-N, Manickam SS, Mccutcheon JR (2011) Controlling electrospun nanofiber morphology and mechanical properties using humidity. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 49:1734–1744. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.2237110.1002/polb.22371 ↗