journal article·2011-08

Impact behavior of in situ TiB2/Al composite at various temperatures

Feifei Wang, Naiheng Ma, Yugang Li, Xianfeng Li, Haowei Wang

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 46· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

The impact behavior of the in situ TiB2/Al composite was investigated at temperatures varying from −50 to 200 °C. The effects of the reinforcement, heat treatment as well as temperature on the impact toughness and failure mechanism were discussed. Results showed that the impact toughness of the composite decreases significantly due to the presence of the stiff TiB2 reinforcements. The precipitations caused by aging play the same role as TiB2 reinforcements, which constrain the deformation of the matrix and reduce the impact toughness. The TiB2/Al composite is more endurable in suffering the impact load at subzero and high temperatures compared to that at room temperature. The fractography of the TiB2/Al composite is a cleavage-and-dimple morphology. The eutectic silicon is the preferred site for catastrophic cracking. There is no cracking in the in situ TiB2 reinforcement because of the small size and near spherical shape. However, the “pulled-out” failure occurs for the TiB2 reinforcement, which is due to the relative weaker interfacial strength than the strength of reinforcement.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · MXene and MAX Phase Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Hassan AM, Mayyas AT, Alrashdan A, Hayajneh MT (2008) J Mater Sci 43:5368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2760-510.1007/s10853-008-2760-5 ↗
2. Park BG, Crosky AG, Hellier AK (2001) J Mater Sci 36:2417. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/a:101792181350310.1023/A:1017921813503 ↗
3. Tjong SC, Wang GS, Mai YW (2005) Compos Sci Technol 65:153710.1016/j.compscitech.2005.01.012 ↗
4. Reddy B, Das K, Das S (2007) J Mater Sci 42:9366. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1827-z10.1007/s10853-007-1827-z ↗
5. Girot FA, Quenisset JM, Naslain R (1987) Compos Sci Technol 30:15510.1016/0266-3538(87)90007-8 ↗
6. Tjong SC, Ma ZY (2000) Mater Sci Eng R 29:4910.1016/S0927-796X(00)00024-3 ↗
7. Ozben T, Kilickap E, ÇakIr O (2008) J Mater Process Technol 198:22010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.06.082 ↗
8. Unsworth JP, Bandyopadhyay S (1994) J Mater Sci 29:4645. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/bf0037629110.1007/BF00376291 ↗
9. Jayamathy M, Kailas SV, Kumar K, Seshan S, Srivatsan TS (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 393:2710.1016/j.msea.2004.09.070 ↗
10. Ozden S, Ekici R, Nair F (2007) Composites A 38:48410.1016/j.compositesa.2006.02.026 ↗
11. Richardson MOW, Wisheart MJ (1996) Composites A 27:112310.1016/1359-835X(96)00074-7 ↗
12. Bonollo F, Ceschini L, Garagnani GL (1997) Appl Compos Mater 4:173
13. Mandal A, Chakraborty M, Murty BS (2008) Mater Sci Eng A 489:22010.1016/j.msea.2008.01.042 ↗
14. Yi HZ, Ma NH, Li XF, Zhang YJ, Wang HW (2006) Mater Sci Eng A 419:1210.1016/j.msea.2005.10.020 ↗
15. Yi HZ, Ma NH, Zhang YJ, Li XF, Wang HW (2006) Scr Mater 54:109310.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.070 ↗
16. Zhang YJ, Ma NH, Wang HW, Le YK, Li SC (2005) Scr Mater 53:117110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.07.017 ↗
17. Ortega-Celaya F, Pech-Canul MI, López-Cuevas J, Rendón-Ángeles JC, Pech-Canul MA (2007) J Mater Process Technol 183:36810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.10.029 ↗
18. ASM (1990) ASM handbook, vol 2. ASM International, Materials Park, OH
19. Tjong SC, Wang GS (2004) Adv Eng Mater 6:96410.1002/adem.200400099 ↗
20. Surappa MK, Sivakumar P (1993) Compos Sci Technol 46:28710.1016/0266-3538(93)90162-A ↗