Simultaneously tough and conductive rubber–graphene–epoxy nanocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
This work investigates the effect of adding graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) and either a phase-separating carboxyl-terminated butadiene acrylonitrile rubber (CTBN) or a polysiloxane core–shell rubber (CSR) to an anhydride-cured epoxy polymer. The effect of adding a reactive diluent to the resin was also investigated. The relationship between the microstructure and the resultant electrical and mechanical properties was investigated. The fracture energy of the unmodified epoxy polymer increased from 125 to 668 J/m2 with the addition of 9 wt% CTBN and 12.5 % reactive diluent. The subsequent addition of GNP to the rubber systems decreased the fracture energy. The epoxy nanocomposites modified with only GNP exhibited only a modest increase in measured fracture energy. The major toughening mechanisms in the rubber-modified formulations were observed to be shear band yielding and cavitation of the rubber particles followed by plastic void growth of the epoxy matrix. The electrical conductivity of the hybrid systems was also investigated. It was observed that the conductivity of the nanocomposites improved when 0.5 wt% of GNP was added although this improvement was lost in a CTBN–GNP system while the conductivity was further improved in the CSR–GNP system over the GNP only system with low-CSR particle loadings. It is demonstrated that this behaviour can be directly attributed to the microstructure of the nanocomposite. The results demonstrate that separation of nanomodified phases at the microscale can be used to develop simultaneously tough and conductive composites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Wu S, Ladani RB, Zhang J, Kinloch AJ, Zhao Z, Ma J et al (2015) Epoxy nanocomposites containing magnetite-carbon nanofibers aligned using a weak magnetic field. Polymer 68(26):25–3410.1016/j.polymer.2015.04.080 ↗
2. Poveda RL, Gupta N (2014) Electrical properties of carbon nanofiber reinforced multiscale polymer composites. Mater Des 56:416–42210.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.074 ↗
3. Ma H, Chen X, Hsiao BS, Chu B (2014) Improving toughness of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene with ionic liquid modified carbon nanofiber. Polymer 55:160–16510.1016/j.polymer.2013.11.043 ↗
4. Bauhofer W, Kovac JZ (2009) A review and analysis of electrical percolation in carbon nanotube polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol 69:1486–149810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.018 ↗
5. Ladani RJ, Wu S, Kinloch AJ, Ghorbani K, Zhang J, Mouritz AP, Wang CH (2016) Multifunctional properties of epoxy nanocomposites reinforced by aligned nanoscale carbon. Mater Des 94:554–56410.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.052 ↗
6. Chandrasekharan S, Seidel C, Schulte K (2013) Preparation and characterization of graphite nano-platelet (GNP)/epoxy nano-composite: mechanical, electrical and thermal properties. Eur Polym J 49(12):3878–388810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.10.008 ↗
7. Wu S, Ladani RB, Zhang J, Bafekrpour E, Ghorbani K, Mouritz AP et al (2015) Aligning multilayer graphene flakes with an external electric field to improve multifunctional properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Carbon 94:607–61810.1016/j.carbon.2015.07.026 ↗
8. Li J, Wong P-S, Kim J-K (2008) Hybrid nanocomposites containing carbon nanotubes and graphite nanoplatelets. Mater Sci Eng A 483–484:660–66310.1016/j.msea.2006.08.145 ↗
9. Rowe EH, Siebert AR, Drake RS (1970) Toughening thermosets with liquid butadiene/acrylonitrile polymers. Mod Plast 47:110–117
10. Kinloch AJ, Shaw SJ, Tod DA, Hunston DL (1983) Deformation and fracture behaviour of a rubber toughened epoxy: 1. Microstructure Fract Studies Polym 24:1341–1354
11. Yee AF, Pearson RA (1986) Toughening mechanisms in elastomer-modified epoxies. Part 1: mechanical studies. J Mater Sci 21:2462–2474. doi: 10.1007/BF0111429310.1007/BF01114293 ↗
12. Pearson RA, Yee AF (1991) Influence of particle size and particle size distribution on toughening mechanism in rubber-modified epoxies. J Mater Sci 26:3828–3844. doi: 10.1007/BF0118497910.1007/BF01184979 ↗
13. Kinloch AJ, Mohammed R, Taylor AC, Eger C, Sprenger S, Egan D (2005) The effect of silica nano-particles and rubber particles on the toughness of multiphase thermosetting epoxy polymers. J Mater Sci 40:5083–5086. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-7261-110.1007/s10853-005-7261-1 ↗
14. Hsieh TH, Kinloch AJ, Masania K, Sohn Lee J, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2010) The toughness of epoxy polymers and fibre composites modified with rubber microparticles and silica nanoparticles. J Mater Sci 45:1193–1210. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-4064-910.1007/s10853-009-4064-9 ↗
15. Chen J, Kinloch AJ, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2013) The mechanical properties and toughening mechanisms of an epoxy polymer modified with polysiloxane-based core-shell particles. Polymer 54:4276–428910.1016/j.polymer.2013.06.009 ↗
16. Quan D, Ivankovic A (2015) Effect of core-shell rubber (CSR) nano-particles on mechanical properties and fracture toughness of an epoxy polymer. Polymer 66:16–2810.1016/j.polymer.2015.04.002 ↗
17. Carolan D, Kinloch AJ, Ivankovic A, Sprenger S, Taylor AC (2016) Toughening of epoxy based polymers with hybrid nanoparticle systems. Polymer 97:179–19010.1016/j.polymer.2016.05.007 ↗
18. Rafiee MA, Rafiee J, Wang Z, Song H, Yu ZZ, Koratkar N (2009) Enhanced mechanical properties of nanocomposites at low graphene content. ACS Nano 3(12):3884–389010.1021/nn9010472 ↗
19. Rafiee MA, Rafiee J, Srivastava I, Wang Z, Song H, Yu ZZ, Koratkar N (2010) Fracture and fatigue in graphene nanocomposites. Small 6(2):179–18310.1002/smll.200901480 ↗
20. Ahmadi-Moghadam B, Taheri F (2014) Fracture and toughening mechanism of GNP-based nanocomposites in mode I and II fracture. Eng Fract Mech 131:329–33910.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.08.008 ↗
21. Chandrakesaran S, Sato N, Tölle F, Müllhaupt R, Fiedler B, Schulte K (2014) Fracture toughness and failure mechanism of graphene based epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 97:90–9910.1016/j.compscitech.2014.03.014 ↗
22. Galpaya D, Wang M, Liu M, Motta N, Waclawik E, Yan C (2012) Recent advances in fabrication and characterization of graphene-polymer nanocomposites. Graphene 1:30–4910.4236/graphene.2012.12005 ↗
23. Xie SH, Liu YY, Li JY (2008) Comparison of the effective conductivity between composites reinforced by graphene nanosheets and carbon nanotubes. Appl Phys Lett 92:243121-1–243121-3
24. Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GHB, Kohlhaas KM, Zimney EJ, Stach EA, Piner RD, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS (2006) Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442:282–28610.1038/nature04969 ↗
25. ISO-527-1 (1996) Plastics, Determination of tensile properties—part 2: test conditions for moulding and extrusion plastics. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
26. Williams JG, Ford H (1976) Stress-strain relationships for some unreinforced plastics. J Mech Eng Sci 16:344–352
27. ISO-13586 (2000) Plastics—determination of fracture toughness (GIC and KIC)—linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) approach. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
28. Adams RD, Atkins RW, Harris JA, Kinloch AJ (1986) Stress analysis and failure properties of carbon-fibre-reinforced-plastic/steel double-lap joints. J Adhes 20(1):29–5310.1080/00218468608073238 ↗
29. Montserrat S, Málek J, Colomer P (1999) Thermal degradation kinetics of epoxy-anhydride resins: II. Influence of a reactive diluent. Thermochim Acta 336(1–2):65–7110.1016/S0040-6031(99)00179-3 ↗
30. Núnez-Regueira L, Villanueva M, Fraga-Rivas I (2006) Effect of a reactive diluent on the curing and dynamo-mechanical properties of an epoxy-diamine system. J Therm Anal Calorim 86:463–46810.1007/s10973-005-7191-9 ↗
31. Galpaya D, Wang M, George G, Motta N, Waclawik E, Yan C (2014) Preparation of graphene oxide/epoxy nanocomposites with significantly improved mechanical properties. J Appl Phys 116:05351810.1063/1.4892089 ↗
32. Chong HM, Taylor AC (2014) The effect of graphene nanoplatelets on the fracture toughness of epoxy polymers. In: 37th annual meeting of the Adhesion Society, San Diego
33. Fox TG (1956) Influence of a diluent and of copolymer composition on the glass temperature of a polymer system. Bull Am Phys Soc 1(3):123–135
34. Andrews EH (1968) Fracture in polymers. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh
35. Faber KT, Evans AG (1983) Crack deflection processes-I. Theory. Acta Metall 31(4):565–57610.1016/0001-6160(83)90046-9 ↗
36. Chen H, Müller MB, Gilmore KJ, Wallace GG, Li D (2008) Mechanically strong, electrically conductive, and biocompatible graphene paper. Adv Mater 20(18):3557–356110.1002/adma.200800757 ↗
37. Jia J, Sun X, Lin X, Shen X, Mai Y-W (2014) J-.K. Kim, Exceptional electrical conductivity and fracture resistance of 3D interconnected graphene foam/epoxy composites. ACS Nano 8(6):5774–578310.1021/nn500590g ↗
38. Lux F (1993) Models proposed to explain the electrical conductivity of mixtures made of conductive and insulating materials. J Mater Sci 28:285–301. doi: 10.1007/BF0035779910.1007/BF00357799 ↗