journal article·2006-08

Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–2Mg alloy base short steel fiber reinforced composites prepared by vortex method

D. Mandal, B. K. Dutta, S. C. Panigrahi

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 41· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

Fabrication and characterization of cast Al–2Mg alloy matrix composites reinforced with short steel fibers are dealt with in the present study. Three types of steel fiber were used: uncoated, copper coated and nickel coated. All the composites were prepared by the liquid metal route using vortex methods. When tested in tension, all composites exhibited improvement in strength due to high relative strength of steel fibers. The ductility was lowered except for the composite with copper coated fibers. Copper coated fiber reinforced composites gave the highest strength. Higher strength accompanied with appreciable ductility demonstrated by composites with copper coated fibers is attributed to the solid solution and fiber strengthening as well as good bonding at the interface. Composites reinforced with uncoated and Ni coated steel fibers did not exhibit strengthening to the level exhibited with copper coated fibers because brittle intermetallic phases are formed at the interface. These phases promote initiation and facilitate propagation of cracks. The observed fracture mechanism of composites was dimple formation, fiber breakage and pullout of fibers. Fracture surface of uncoated and Ni coated composites showed extensive pull out of fibers as well as fiber breakage confirming the above inference. In case of the copper coated composites dimple formation and coalescence was more extensive. EDX analysis showed a build up Cu, Ni, and Fe at the interface.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Stacey MH (1988) Mater Sci Tech 4:22710.1179/mst.1988.4.3.227 ↗
2. Quigley BF, Abbaschian GJ, Wunderline R, Mehrabian R (1982) Metall Trans 13A:9310.1007/BF02642419 ↗
3. Surappa MK, Rohatgi PK (1981) J Mater Sci 16:98310.1007/BF00542743 ↗
4. Baron RP, Jones C, Wawner FE, Wert JA (1991) Mater Sci Engg A259:308
5. Bhagat RP (Sep-1988) Composite A 19(5)10.1016/0010-4361(88)90127-9 ↗
6. Wang YQ, Zhou BL (1996) Composite A 27A:113910.1016/1359-835X(96)00072-3 ↗
7. Ding DY, Wang DZ, Zhang WL, Yao CK, Rao JC, Li DX (2000) Mater Lett 45:610.1016/S0167-577X(00)00063-X ↗
8. Mortensen A (1991) Mater Sci Engg A135:1
9. Suzuki T, Umehara H, Hayashi R (Oct-1993) J Mater Res 8(10):249210.1557/JMR.1993.2492 ↗
10. Banerji A, Surappa MK, Rohatgi P (June-1983) Metall Trans B 14B:27310.1007/BF02661024 ↗
11. Ravichandran MV, Prasad RK, Dwarakadasa ES (1992) J Mater Lett 11:45210.1007/BF00731101 ↗
12. Murali TP, Surappa MK, Rohatgi PK (Sep 1982) Metall Trans B 13B:48510.1007/BF02667765 ↗
13. Aluminium properties and physical Metallurgy (1984) In: Hatch JE (ed) American society of metals, Metals Park, Ohio, pp 229–235
14. Fridlyander IN, Bubenschikov AS (1995) In: Fridlyander IN (ed) Metal Matrix Composites, Chapman & Hall, Chapter. 7, p 397
15. Bhagat RB (1989) J Mater Sci 24:149610.1007/BF02397092 ↗
16. Baron RP, Wert JA, Gerard DA, Wawner FE (1997) J Mater Sci 32:643510.1023/A:1018686505563 ↗