Tensile behaviour of nonwoven structures: comparison with experimental results
Source abstract
Abstract
Nonwoven structures have been recently explored for numerous novel applications ranging from composites to scaffolds. The tensile property of nonwovens is a pre-requisite and indeed, one of the main parameters to determine their performance for such applications. In the first part, a modified micromechanical model describing the tensile behaviour of thermally bonded nonwovens was proposed by incorporating the effect of fibre re-orientation during the deformation (Rawal et al., J Mater Sci 45:2274, 2010). In this study, an attempt has been made to compare the theoretical and experimental stress–strain curves of thermally bonded and spunbonded nonwoven structures. These theoretical findings have been obtained from the most popular analytical tensile models of nonwovens available in the literature in addition to our modified tensile model. Poisson’s ratio has also been determined experimentally in order to predict the stress–strain behaviour of nonwoven, and its relationship with longitudinal strain has clearly distinguished between the randomly and preferentially orientated types of structures. In thermally bonded nonwovens, the tensile strength in various test directions is computed through pull-out stress and a comparison is made with the experimental results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Lukić S, Jovanić P (2004) Mater Lett 58:43910.1016/S0167-577X(03)00521-4 ↗
2. Patnaik A, Tejyan S, Rawal A (accepted) Soil erosion behaviour of needlepunched nonwoven reinforced composites. Res J Text Appar
3. Engelmayr GC, Sacks MS (2006) J Biomech Eng 128:61010.1115/1.2205371 ↗
4. Backer S, Petterson DR (1960) Text Res J 30:70410.1177/004051756003000912 ↗
5. Hearle JWS, Stevenson PJ (1963) Text Res J 33:87710.1177/004051756303301101 ↗
6. Hearle JWS, Stevenson PJ (1964) Text Res J 34:18110.1177/004051756403400301 ↗
7. Bais-Singh S, Goswami BC (1995) J Text Inst 86:27110.1080/00405009508631333 ↗
8. Kim HS (2004) Fibers Polym 5:13910.1007/BF02902928 ↗
9. van Wyk CM (1946) J Text Inst 37:T28510.1080/19447024608659279 ↗
10. Komori T, Makishima K (1977) Text Res J 47:1310.1177/004051757704700104 ↗
11. Komori T, Makishima K (1978) Text Res J 48:30910.1177/004051757804800601 ↗
12. Pan N (1993) Text Res J 63:33610.1177/004051759306300605 ↗
13. Pan N, Chen J, Seo M, Backer S (1997) Text Res J 67:90710.1177/004051759706701208 ↗
14. Mueller DH, Kochmann M (2004) Int Nonwovens J 13:56
15. Limem S, Warner SB (2005) Text Res J 75:6310.1177/004051750507500112 ↗
16. Hou X, Acar M, Silberschmidt VV (2009) Comput Mater Sci 46:70010.1016/j.commatsci.2009.07.007 ↗
17. Demirci E, Acar M, Pourdeyhimi, B, Silberschmidt VV (in press) Comput Mater Sci. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci02:039
18. Hou X, Acar M, Silberschmidt VV (in press) Comput Mater Sci. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.03.00910.1016/j.commatsci.2010.03.009 ↗
19. Rawal A, Priyadarshi A, Lomov SV, Ngo T, Verpoest I, Vankerrebrouck J (2010) J Mater Sci 45:2274. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-4152-x10.1007/s10853-009-4152-x ↗
20. Pan N (1993) J Text Inst 84:47210.1080/00405009308658979 ↗
21. Jones RM (1975) Mechanics of composite materials. McGraw-Hill, New York10.1115/1.3423688 ↗
22. Rawal A, Lomov SV, Ngo T, Verpoest I, Vankerrebrouck J (2007) Text Res J 77:41710.1177/0040517507081313 ↗
23. Rawal A, Lomov SV, Verpoest I (2008) J Text Inst 99:23510.1080/00405000701404197 ↗
24. Rawal A (2006) J Ind Text 36:13310.1177/1528083706067691 ↗