journal article·2015-04

Three-dimensional imaging of electrospun fiber mats using confocal laser scanning microscopy and digital image analysis

Looh Tchuin Choong, Peng Yi, Gregory C. Rutledge

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 50· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Confocal laser scanning microscopy with fluorescent markers and index matching has been used to collect three-dimensional (3D) digitized images of electrospun fiber mats and of a borosilicate glass fiber material. By embedding the fluorescent dye in either the material component (fibers) or pore space component (the index-matching fluid), acquisitions of both positive and negative images of the porous fibrous materials are demonstrated. Image analysis techniques are then applied to the 3D reconstructions of the fibrous materials to extract important morphological characteristics such as porosity, specific surface area, distributions of fiber diameter and of pore diameter, and fiber orientation distribution; the results are compared with other experimental measurements where available. The topology of the pore space is quantified for an electrospun mat for the first time using the Euler-Poincare characteristic. Finally, a method is presented for subdividing the pore space into a network of cavities and the gates that interconnect them, by which the network structure of the pore space in these electrospun mats is determined.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Baldwin CA et al (1996) Determination and characterization of the structure of a pore space from 3D volume images. J Colloid Interface Sci 181(1):79–9210.1006/jcis.1996.0358 ↗
2. Auzerais FM et al (1996) Transport in sandstone: a study based on three dimensional microtomography. Geophys Res Lett 23(7):705–70810.1029/96GL00776 ↗
3. Jones JR et al (2007) Non-destructive quantitative 3D analysis for the optimisation of tissue scaffolds. Biomaterials 28(7):1404–141310.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.014 ↗
4. Jaganathan S, Vahedi Tafreshi H, Pourdeyhimi B (2008) A realistic approach for modeling permeability of fibrous media: 3-D imaging coupled with CFD simulation. Chem Eng Sci 63(1):244–25210.1016/j.ces.2007.09.020 ↗
5. Levitz P (2007) Toolbox for 3D imaging and modeling of porous media: relationship with transport properties. Cem Concr Res 37(3):351–35910.1016/j.cemconres.2006.08.004 ↗
6. Turner ML et al (2004) Three-dimensional imaging of multiphase flow in porous media. Physica A 339(1–2):166–17210.1016/j.physa.2004.03.059 ↗
7. Kozeny J (1927) Ueber kapillare Leitung des Wassers im Boden. Sitzungsber Akad Wiss Wien 136(2a):271–306
8. Carman P (1937) Fluid flow through granular beds. Trans Inst Chem Eng 15:150–166
9. Fatt I (1956) The network model of porous media 1. Capillary pressure characteristics. Trans Am Inst Min Metall Eng 207(7):144–159
10. Valvatne PH, Blunt MJ (2004) Predictive pore-scale modeling of two-phase flow in mixed wet media. Water Resour Res 40(7):W0740610.1029/2003WR002627 ↗
11. Chen S, Doolen GD (1998) Lattice Boltzmann method for fluid flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 30(1):329–36410.1146/annurev.fluid.30.1.329 ↗
12. Cancedda R et al (2003) Tissue engineering and cell therapy of cartilage and bone. Matrix Biol 22(1):81–9110.1016/S0945-053X(03)00012-X ↗
13. Lowery JL, Datta N, Rutledge GC (2010) Effect of fiber diameter, pore size and seeding method on growth of human dermal fibroblasts in electrospun poly(ɛ-caprolactone) fibrous mats. Biomaterials 31(3):491–50410.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.072 ↗
14. Luu YK et al (2003) Development of a nanostructured DNA delivery scaffold via electrospinning of PLGA and PLA–PEG block copolymers. J Controlled Release 89(2):341–35310.1016/S0168-3659(03)00097-X ↗
15. Liu H et al (2004) Polymeric nanowire chemical sensor. Nano Lett 4(4):671–67510.1021/nl049826f ↗
16. Chen L et al (2010) Multifunctional electrospun fabrics via layer-by-layer electrostatic assembly for chemical and biological protection. Chem Mater 22(4):1429–143610.1021/cm902834a ↗
17. Burger C, Hsiao BS, Chu B (2006) Nanofibrous materials and their applications. Annu Rev Mater Res 36(1):333–36810.1146/annurev.matsci.36.011205.123537 ↗
18. Pai C-L, Boyce MC, Rutledge GC (2011) Mechanical properties of individual electrospun PA 6(3)T fibers and their variation with fiber diameter. Polymer 52(10):2295–230110.1016/j.polymer.2011.03.041 ↗
19. Tomba E et al (2010) Artificial vision system for the automatic measurement of interfiber pore characteristics and fiber diameter distribution in nanofiber assemblies. Ind Eng Chem Res 49(6):2957–296810.1021/ie901179m ↗
20. Rutledge GC, Lowery JL, Pai CL (2009) Characterization by mercury porosimetry of nonwoven fiber media with deformation. J Eng Fibers Fabr 4(3):1–13
21. Jena A, Gupta K (2005) Pore volume of nanofiber nonwovens. Int Nonwovens J 14(2):25–30
22. Sampson W, Urquhart S (2008) The contribution of out-of-plane pore dimensions to the pore size distribution of paper and stochastic fibrous materials. J Porous Mater 15(4):411–41710.1007/s10934-006-9088-9 ↗
23. Eichhorn SJ, Sampson WW (2010) Relationships between specific surface area and pore size in electrospun polymer fibre networks. J R Soc Interface 7:641–64910.1098/rsif.2009.0374 ↗
24. Ho ST, Hutmacher DW (2006) A comparison of micro CT with other techniques used in the characterization of scaffolds. Biomaterials 27(8):1362–137610.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.035 ↗
25. Stachewicz U et al (2012) Manufacture of void-free electrospun polymer nanofiber composites with optimized mechanical properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4(5):2577–258210.1021/am300235r ↗
26. Sarada T, Sawyer LC, Ostler MI (1983) Three dimensional structure of Celgard® microporous membranes. J Membr Sci 15(1):97–11310.1016/S0376-7388(00)81364-2 ↗
27. Bagherzadeh R et al (2013) Three-dimensional pore structure analysis of nano/microfibrous scaffolds using confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 101A(3):765–77410.1002/jbm.a.34379 ↗
28. Thibault X, Bloch J-F (2002) Structural analysis by X-ray microtomography of a strained nonwoven papermaker felt. Text Res J 72(6):480–48510.1177/004051750207200603 ↗
29. Arns C et al (2002) Computation of linear elastic properties from microtomographic images: methodology and agreement between theory and experiment. Geophysics 67(5):1396–140510.1190/1.1512785 ↗
30. Cox G, Sheppard CJR (2004) Practical limits of resolution in confocal and non-linear microscopy. Microsc Res Tech 63(1):18–2210.1002/jemt.10423 ↗
31. Choong L et al (2013) Compressibility of electrospun fiber mats. J Mater Sci 48(22):7827–7836. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7528-x10.1007/s10853-013-7528-x ↗
32. Jähne B (2005) Digital image processing. 6th Rev. and Extended Ed. Springer, Berlin, New York, xiii, 607 p
33. Toll S, Manson JAE (1995) Elastic compression of a fiber network. J Appl Mech 62(1):223–22610.1115/1.2895906 ↗
34. Heller W (1965) Remarks on refractive index mixture rules. J Phys Chem 69(4):1123–112910.1021/j100888a006 ↗
35. Gooch JW (2011) Encyclopedic dictionary of polymers, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, NY10.1007/978-1-4419-6247-8 ↗
36. http://www.filmetrics.com/refractive-index-database/BSG/Borosilicate-Glass-Microscope-Slide . Accessed 25 August, 2014
37. Schindelin J et al (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Method 9(7):676–68210.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
38. du Roscoat SR, Bloch J-F, Thibault X (2005) Synchrotron radiation microtomography applied to investigation of paper. J Phys D Appl Phys 38(10A):A7810.1088/0022-3727/38/10A/015 ↗
39. Pfeifer P et al (1991) Structure analysis of porous solids from preadsorbed films. Langmuir 7(11):2833–284310.1021/la00059a069 ↗
40. Gelb LD, Gubbins KE (1999) Pore size distributions in porous glasses: a computer simulation study. Langmuir 15(2):305–30810.1021/la9808418 ↗
41. Serra JP (1982) Image analysis and mathematical morphology. Academic Press, London
42. Ohser J, Nagel W (1996) The estimation of the Euler-Poincare characteristic from observations on parallel sections. J Microsc 184(2):117–12610.1111/j.1365-2818.1996.tb00006.x ↗
43. Nagel Ohser, Pischang (2000) An integral-geometric approach for the Euler-Poincaré characteristic of spatial images. J Microsc 198(1):54–6210.1046/j.1365-2818.2000.00668.x ↗
44. Vogel HJ (1997) Morphological determination of pore connectivity as a function of pore size using serial sections. Eur J Soil Sci 48(3):365–37710.1046/j.1365-2389.1997.00096.x ↗
45. Kanit T et al (2003) Determination of the size of the representative volume element for random composites: statistical and numerical approach. Int J Solids Struct 40(13–14):3647–367910.1016/S0020-7683(03)00143-4 ↗
46. Kanit T et al (2006) Apparent and effective physical properties of heterogeneous materials: representativity of samples of two materials from food industry. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(33–36):3960–398210.1016/j.cma.2005.07.022 ↗
47. du Roscoat SR et al (2007) Estimation of microstructural properties from synchrotron X-ray microtomography and determination of the REV in paper materials. Acta Mater 55(8):2841–285010.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.050 ↗
48. Wang R et al (2012) Electrospun nanofibrous membranes for high flux microfiltration. J Membr Sci 392:167–17410.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.019 ↗
49. Pham QP, Sharma U, Mikos AG (2006) Electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) microfiber and multilayer nanofiber/microfiber scaffolds: characterization of scaffolds and measurement of cellular infiltration. Biomacromolecules 7(10):2796–280510.1021/bm060680j ↗
50. Rijke AM (1970) Wettability and phylogenetic development of feather structure in water birds. J Exp Biol 52(2):469–47910.1242/jeb.52.2.469 ↗
51. Tuteja A et al (2008) Robust omniphobic surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(47):18200–1820510.1073/pnas.0804872105 ↗