Fabrication and in vitro biocompatibility of sodium tripolyphosphate-crosslinked chitosan–hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone regeneration
Source abstract
Abstract
The aims of this study were to fabricate a novel chitosan–hydroxyapatite (CHA) scaffold crosslinked with sodium tripolyphosphate (TPP) and evaluate its in vitro biocompatibility. CHA scaffolds were fabricated via direct blending and lyophilization and further crosslinked with different concentrations (0.1 M, 0.2 M and 0.4 M) of TPP. Microstructure of TPP-CHA scaffolds was examined by using field emission scanning electron microscope. Porosity and compressive modulus of composite scaffolds were analyzed. The biodegradability of TPP-crosslinked CHA scaffolds was studied for 30 days and in vitro biocompatibility and functionality were evaluated using osteoblast-like cells, MG63, in terms of cell viability, adhesion, proliferation and early differentiation. All scaffolds showed an interconnected honeycomb-like microstructure except 0.4 M TPP-CHA scaffolds, which demonstrated the most compact and least porous structure with pore sizes of 62–185 µm. In contrast, 0.1 M TPP-CHA scaffolds exhibited the highest porosity, measured as 58.6% and pore sizes of 74–207 µm. Besides, 0.1 M TPP-CHA scaffolds also showed the lowest compressive modulus of 2.54 kPa. All TPP-crosslinked CHA scaffolds degraded to a similar extent (1.93–5.03%). Current findings revealed that 0.1 M TPP-CHA scaffolds are the most biocompatible one by promoting good cell viability with the highest adhesion, proliferation and early differentiation activities on MG63 cells among the other scaffolds. In conclusion, 0.1 M TPP-CHA scaffolds exhibited the most promising physiochemical and biocompatible properties which can be used as an alternative regenerative material for bone tissue engineering.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Dental materials and restorations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (91)
Show source-provided references
1. Barati D (2016) Biodegradable hybrid tissue engineering scaffolds for reconstruction of large bone defects. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina
2. Office of the Surgeon General (US) (2014) Bone health and osteoporosis: a report of the surgeon general. Office of the Surgeon General (US), Rockville
3. Bose S, Roy M, Bandyopadhyay A (2012) Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol 30(10):546–55410.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005 ↗
4. Rosetia L, Parisia V, Petrettaa M, Cavalloa C, Desandoa G, Bartolottia I, Grigolo B (2017) Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and new perspectives. Mater Sci Eng, C 78:1246–126210.1016/j.msec.2017.05.017 ↗
5. Amini AR, Laurencin CT, Nukavarapu SP (2012) Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 40(5):363–40810.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v40.i5.10 ↗
6. Tatkare D (2016) Bone grafts and substitutes market by product (allografts, bone grafts substitutes, and cell-based matrices), by application (spinal fusion, long bone, foot & ankle, craniomaxillofacial, joint reconstruction, and dental bone grafting)—Global opportunity analysis and industry forecast 2014–2022, Allied Market Research database
7. Luo T, Zhang W, Shi B, Cheng X, Zhang Y (2012) Enhanced bone regeneration around dental implant with bone morphogenetic protein 2 gene and vascular endothelial growth factor protein delivery. Clin Oral Implant Res 23:467–47410.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02164.x ↗
8. Chan WD, Perinpanayagam H, Goldberg HA, Hunter GK, Dixon SJ, Santos GC Jr, Rizkalla AS (2009) Tissue engineering scaffolds for the regeneration of craniofacial bone. J Can Dental Assoc 75(5):373–377
9. Falisi G, Galli M, Vittorini-Velasquez P, Gallegos-Rivera JC, Minasi R, De Biase A, Di Paolo C (2013) Use of 3D cartilage scaffolds for the stabilization of implants and bone regeneration with the fit-lock technique. Int J Appl Basic Dental Res 26(3):167–172
10. Roberts TT, Rosenbaum AJ (2012) Bone grafts, bone substitutes and orthobiologics: the bridge between basic science and clinical advancements in fracture healing. Organogenesis 8(4):114–12410.4161/org.23306 ↗
11. Alvarez K, Nakajima H (2009) Metallic scaffolds for bone regeneration. Materials 2(3):790–832
12. Arsad SMM, Lee PM, Lee KH (2011) Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and β-TCP particles. Second Int Conf Biotechnol Food Sci 7:184–188
13. Yang J, Kang Y, Browne C, Jiang T, Yang Y (2015) Graded porous β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds enhance bone regeneration in mandible augmentation. J Craniofac Surg 26(2):148–15310.1097/SCS.0000000000001383 ↗
14. Piétua G, Ehlinger M (2017) Minimally invasive internal fixation of distal femur fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(1):161–16910.1016/j.otsr.2016.06.025 ↗
15. Mohamed KR, Beherei HH, El-Rashidy ZM (2014) in vitro study of nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan–gelatin composites for bio-applications. J Adv Res 5(2):201–20810.1016/j.jare.2013.02.004 ↗
16. Thein-Han WW, Misra RDK (2009) Biomimetic chitosan–nanohydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 5(4):1182–119710.1016/j.actbio.2008.11.025 ↗
17. Dreifke MB, Ebraheim NA, Jayasuriya AC (2013) Investigation of potential injectable polymeric biomaterials for bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 101(8):2436–244710.1002/jbm.a.34521 ↗
18. Zhou T, Wu J, Liu J, Luo Y, Wan Y (2015) Fabrication and characterization of layered chitosan/silk fibroin/nano-hydroxyapatite scaffolds with designed composition and mechanical properties. Biomed Mater 10(4):045013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/10/4/04501310.1088/1748-6041/10/4/045013 ↗
19. Li B, Huang L, Wang X, Ma J, Xie F, Xia L (2013) Effect of micropores and citric acid on the bioactivity of phosphorylated chitosan/chitosan/hydroxyapatite composites. Ceram Int 39(3):3423–342710.1016/j.ceramint.2012.09.069 ↗
20. Scalera F, Gervaso F, Sanosh KP, Sannino A, Licciulli A (2013) Influence of the calcination temperature on morphological and mechanical properties of highly porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds. Ceram Int 39(5):4839–484610.1016/j.ceramint.2012.11.076 ↗
21. Wu Q, Zhang X, Wu B, Huang W (2013) Effects of microwave sintering on the properties of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds. Ceram Int 39(3):2389–239510.1016/j.ceramint.2012.08.091 ↗
22. Sionkowska A, Kaczmarek B (2017) Preparation and characterization of composites based on the blends of collagen, chitosan and hyaluronic acid with nano-hydroxyapatite. Int J Biol Macromol 102:658–66610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.03.196 ↗
23. Murugan R, Ramakrishna S (2004) Nano-structured biomaterials. In: Nalwa HS (ed) Encyclopedia of nanoscience and nanotechnology. American Scientific Publishers, California, p 595
24. Arsad MSM, Lee PM, Lee KH (2010) Morphology and particle size analysis of hydroxyapatite micro- and nano-particles. In: International conference on science and social research (CSSR 2010), pp 1030–103410.1109/CSSR.2010.5773682 ↗
25. Rishna R, Mayer J, Winter E, Kam M, Leong W (2001) Biomedical applications of polymer-composite materials a review. Compos Sci Technol 61(9):1189–122410.1016/S0266-3538(00)00241-4 ↗
26. Kikuclin M, Itoh S, Ichinose S, Shinomiya K, Tanaka J (2001) Self-organization mechanism in a bone-like hydroxyapatite/collagen nanocomposite synthesized in vitro and its biological reaction in vivo. Biomaterials 22(13):1705–171110.1016/S0142-9612(00)00305-7 ↗
27. Toworfe GK, Composto RJ, Shapiro IM, Ducheyne P (2006) Nucleation and growth of calcium phosphate on amine-, carboxyl- and hydroxyl-silane self-assembled monolayers. Biomaterials 27(4):631–64210.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.06.017 ↗
28. Family R, Solati-Hashjin M, Namjoy Nik S, Nemati A (2012) Surface modification for titanium implants by hydroxyapatite nanocomposite. Casp J Intern Med 3(3):460–465
29. Yamaguchi I, Tokuchi K, Fukuzaki H, Koyama Y, Takakuda K, Monma H, Tanaka J (2001) Preparation and microstructure analysis of chitosan/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 55(1):20–2710.1002/1097-4636(200104)55:1<20::AID-JBM30>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
30. Li Z, Yubao L, Aiping Y, Xuelin P, Xuejiang W, Xiang Z (2005) Preparation and in vitro investigation of chitosan/nano-hydroxyapatite composite used as bone substitute materials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 16(3):213–21910.1007/s10856-005-6682-3 ↗
31. Ibrahim HM, El-Bisi MK, Taha GM, El-Alfy EA (2015) Chitosan nanoparticles loaded antibiotics as drug delivery biomaterial. J Appl Pharm Sci 5(10):85–9010.7324/JAPS.2015.501015 ↗
32. Huang Y, Caia Y, Lapitsky Y (2015) Factors affecting the stability of chitosan/tripolyphosphate micro- and nanogels: resolving the opposing findings. J Mater Chem B 3(29):5957–597010.1039/C5TB00431D ↗
33. Dash M, Chiellini F, Ottenbrite RM, Chiellini E (2011) Chitosan—a versatile semi-synthetic polymer in biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci 36(8):981–101410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.02.001 ↗
34. Levengood SKL, Zhang MQ (2014) Chitosan-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B 2(21):3161–318410.1039/c4tb00027g ↗
35. Martinez-Alvarez C, Gonzalez-Meli B, Berenguer-Froehner B et al (2013) Injection and adhesion palatoplasty: a preliminary study in a canine model. J Surg Res 183(2):654–66210.1016/j.jss.2013.03.009 ↗
36. Mogosanu GD, Grumezescu AM (2014) Natural and synthetic polymers for wounds and burns dressing. Int J Pharm 463(2):127–13610.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.12.015 ↗
37. Uswatta SP, Okeke IU, Jayasuriya AC (2016) Injectable porous nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan/tripolyphosphate scaffolds with improved compressive strength for bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 69:505–51210.1016/j.msec.2016.06.089 ↗
38. Venkatesan J, Kim SK (2010) Chitosan composites for bone tissue engineering—an overview. Mar Drugs 8(8):2252–226610.3390/md8082252 ↗
39. Silva SS, Luna SM, Gomes ME, Benesch J, Pashkuleva I, Mano JF, Reis RL (2008) Plasma surface modification of chitosan membranes: characterization and preliminary cell response studies. Macromol Biosci 8(6):568–57610.1002/mabi.200700264 ↗
40. Bose S, Tarafder S (2012) Calcium phosphate ceramic systems in growth factor and drug delivery for bone tissue engineering: a review. Acta Biomater 8(4):1401–142110.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.017 ↗
41. Jayakumar R, Prabaharan M, Nair SV, Tamura H (2010) Novel chitin and chitosan nanofibers in biomedical applications. Biotechnol Adv 28(1):142–15010.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.11.001 ↗
42. Zhang Y, Zhang MQ (2001) Synthesis and characterization of macroporous chitosan/calcium phosphate composite scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 55(3):304–31210.1002/1097-4636(20010605)55:3<304::AID-JBM1018>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
43. Jarquín-Yáñez K, Arenas-Alatorre JA, Piñón-Zárate G, Arellano-Olivares RM (2016) Structural effect of different EDC crosslinker concentration in gelatin- hyaluronic acid scaffolds. J Bioeng Biomed Sci 6(2):182. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9538.100018210.4172/2155-9538.1000182 ↗
44. Pati F, Adhikari B, Dhara S (2012) Development of chitosan-tripolyphosphate non-woven fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering application. J Mater Sci Mater Med 23(4):1085–109610.1007/s10856-012-4559-9 ↗
45. Gabriel Paulraj M, Ignacimuthu S, Gandhi MR, Shajahan A, Ganesan P, Packiam SM, Al-Dhabi NA (2017) Comparative studies of tripolyphosphate and glutaraldehyde cross-linked chitosan-botanical pesticide nanoparticles and their agricultural applications. Int J Biol Macromol 104(Pt B):1813–181910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.043 ↗
46. Siddiqui N, Pramanik K, Jabbari E (2015) Osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in freeze-gelled chitosan/nano β-tricalcium phosphate porous scaffolds crosslinked with genipin. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 54:76–8310.1016/j.msec.2015.05.005 ↗
47. Pinto CA, Saripella KK, Loka NC, Neau SH (2018) Development and characterization of chitosan cross-linked with tripolyphosphate as a sustained release agent in tablets, part I: design of experiments and optimization. J Pharm Sci 107(4):1063–107510.1016/j.xphs.2017.11.018 ↗
48. Kyzioł A, Mazgała A, Michna J, Regiel-Futyra A, Sebastian V (2017) Preparation and characterization of alginate/chitosan formulations for ciprofloxacin-controlled delivery. J Biomater Appl 32(2):162–17410.1177/0885328217714352 ↗
49. Machul A, Mikołajczyk D, Regiel-Futyra A et al (2015) Study on inhibitory activity of chitosan-based materials against biofilm producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. J Biomater Appl 30(3):269–27810.1177/0885328215578781 ↗
50. Servat-Medina L, González-Gómez A, Reyes-Ortega F et al (2015) Chitosan–tripolyphosphate nanoparticles as Arrabidaea chica standardized extract carrier: synthesis, characterization, biocompatibility, and antiulcerogenic activity. Int J Nanomed 10:3897–390910.2147/IJN.S83705 ↗
51. Karimi M, Avci P, Ahi M, Gazori T, Hamblin MR, Naderi-Manesh H (2013) Evaluation of chitosan-tripolyphosphate nanoparticles as a p-shRNA delivery vector: formulation, optimization and cellular uptake study. J Nanopharm Drug Deliv 1(3):266–27810.1166/jnd.2013.1027 ↗
52. Fisher JP, Reddi AH (2003) Functional tissue engineering of bone: signals and scaffolds. Top Tissue Eng 1:1–29
53. Bhushan B (2010) Scanning probe microscopy in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Springer, Berlin, p 47110.1007/978-3-642-03535-7 ↗
54. Unosson J, Persson C, Engqvist H (2015) An evaluation of methods to determine the porosity of calcium phosphate cements. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 103B:62–7110.1002/jbm.b.33173 ↗
55. Shimojo AAM, Galdames SEM, Perez AGM et al (2016) In vitro performance of injectable chitosan-tripolyphosphate scaffolds combined with platelet-rich plasma. Tissue Eng Regen Med 13(1):21–3010.1007/s13770-015-9111-9 ↗
56. Fan J (2016) Hemocytometer cell count and trypan blue cell viability. McMaster University
57. Kanade S, Nataraj G, Ubale M, Mehta P (2016) Fluorescein diacetate vital staining for detecting viability of acid-fast bacilli in patients on antituberculosis treatment. Int J Mycobacteriol 5(3):294–29810.1016/j.ijmyco.2016.06.003 ↗
58. Jo HY, Kim Y, Park HW et al (2015) The unreliability of MTT assay in the cytotoxic test of primary cultured glioblastoma cells. Exp Neurobiol 24(3):235–24510.5607/en.2015.24.3.235 ↗
59. Aboudzadeh N, Imani M, Shokrgozar MA, Khavandi A, Javadpour J, Shafieyan Y, Farokhi M (2010) Fabrication and characterization of poly(d, l-lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 94(1):137–14510.1002/jbm.a.32673 ↗
60. Zhang Y, Ni M, Zhang M, Ratner B (2003) Calcium phosphate-chitosan composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 9(2):337–34510.1089/107632703764664800 ↗
61. Zhang L, Morsi Y, Wang Y, Li Y, Ramakrishna S (2013) Review scaffold design and stem cells for tooth regeneration. Jpn Dental Sci Rev 49(1):14–2610.1016/j.jdsr.2012.09.001 ↗
62. O’Brien F (2011) Biomaterials and scaffolds for tissue engineering. Materials 14(3):88–95
63. Dhandayuthapani B, Yoshida Y, Maekawa T, Kumar DS (2011) Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: a review. Int J Polym Sci 2011:19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/29060210.1155/2011/290602 ↗
64. Lu T, Li Y, Chen T (2013) Techniques for fabrication and construction of three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering. Int J Nanomed 8:337–35010.2147/IJN.S38635 ↗
65. Shavandi A, Ael-D B, Ali MA, Sun Z, Gould M (2015) Development and characterization of hydroxyapatite/β-TCP/chitosan composites for tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng, C 56:481–49310.1016/j.msec.2015.07.004 ↗
66. Loh QL, Choong C (2013) Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 19(6):485–50210.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 ↗
67. Roosa SMM, Kemppainen JM, Moffitt EN, Krebsbach PH, Hollister SJ (2009) The pore size of polycaprolactone scaffolds has limited influence on bone regeneration in an in vivo model. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 92(1):359–36810.1002/jbm.a.32381 ↗
68. Murphy CM, O’Brien FJ (2010) Understanding the effect of mean pore size on cell activity in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Cell Adhes Migr 4(3):377–38110.4161/cam.4.3.11747 ↗
69. Rogina A, Rico P, Ferrer G, Ivanković M, Ivanković H (2016) In situ hydroxyapatite content affects the cell differentiation on porous chitosan/hydroxyapatite scaffolds. Ann Biomed Eng 44(4):1107–111910.1007/s10439-015-1418-0 ↗
70. Bružauskaitė I, Bironaitė D, Bagdonas E, Bernotienė E (2016) Scaffolds and cells for tissue regeneration: different scaffold pore sizes—different cell effects. Cytotechnology 68(3):355–36910.1007/s10616-015-9895-4 ↗
71. Olad A, Azhar FF (2014) The synergetic effect of bioactive ceramic and nanoclay on the properties of chitosan–gelatin/nanohydroxyapatite–montmorillonite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Ceram Int 40(7):10061–1007210.1016/j.ceramint.2014.04.010 ↗
72. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D (2005) Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 26(27):5474–549110.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
73. Hutmacher DW (2000) Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21(24):2529–254310.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
74. Yook SW, Jung HD, Park CH, Shin KH, Koh YH, Estrin Y, Kim HE (2012) Reverse freeze casting: a new method for fabricating highly porous titanium scaffolds with aligned large pores. Acta Biomater 8(6):2401–241010.1016/j.actbio.2012.03.020 ↗
75. Hadjicharalambous C, Prymak O, Loza K, Buyakov A, Kulkov S, Chatzinikolaidou M (2015) Effect of porosity of alumina and zirconia ceramics toward pre-osteoblast response. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 3:175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2015.0017510.3389/fbioe.2015.00175 ↗
76. Pilia M, Guda T, Appleford M (2013) Development of composite scaffolds for load-bearing segmental bone defects. Biomed Res Int 2013:458253. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/45825310.1155/2013/458253 ↗
77. Pati F, Kalita H, Adhikari B, Dhara S (2013) Osteoblastic cellular responses on ionically crosslinked chitosan-tripolyphosphate fibrous 3-D mesh scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 101(9):2526–253710.1002/jbm.a.34559 ↗
78. Hanninka G, Arts JJC (2011) Bioresorbability, porosity and mechanical strength of bone substitutes: What is optimal for bone regeneration? Injury 42(2):22–2510.1016/j.injury.2011.06.008 ↗
79. Wong FSY, Chan BP, Lo ACY (2014) Carriers in cell-based therapies for neurological disorders. Int J Mol Sci 15(6):10669–1072310.3390/ijms150610669 ↗
80. Gibon E, Lu LY, Nathan K, Goodman SB (2017) Inflammation, ageing, and bone regeneration. J Orthop Transl 10:28–35
81. Murphy CM, O’Brien FJ, Little DG, Schindeler A (2013) Cell-scaffold interactions in the bone tissue engineering triad. Eur Cells Mater 26:120–13210.22203/eCM.v026a09 ↗
82. Trichet L, Le Digabel J, Hawkins RJ et al (2012) Evidence of a large-scale mechanosensing mechanism for cellular adaptation to substrate stiffness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(18):6933–693810.1073/pnas.1117810109 ↗
83. Zhou D, Qi C, Chen Y-X et al (2017) Comparative study of porous hydroxyapatite/chitosan and whitlockite/chitosan scaffolds for bone regeneration in calvarial defects. Int J Nanomed 12:2673–268710.2147/IJN.S131251 ↗
84. Kong LJ, Qiang A, Jing X, Zhang L, Gong YD, Zhao NM, Zhang XF (2007) Proliferation and differentiation of MC 3T3-E1 cells cultured on nanohydroxyapatite/chitosan composite scaffolds. Chin J Biotechnol 23(2):262–26710.1016/S1872-2075(07)60023-5 ↗
85. Yeo MG, Jung WK, Kim GH (2012) Fabrication, characterisation and biological activity of phlorotannin-conjugated PCL/β-TCP composite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration. J Mater Chem 22:3568–357710.1039/c2jm14725d ↗
86. Lim SS, Chai CY, Loh H-S (2017) in vitro evaluation of osteoblast adhesion, proliferation and differentiation on chitosan-TiO2 nanotubes scaffolds with Ca2+ ions. Mater Sci Eng, C 76:144–15210.1016/j.msec.2017.03.075 ↗
87. Chen Y, Huang Z, Li X et al (2012) In vitro biocompatibility and osteoblast differentiation of an injectable chitosan/nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen scaffold. J Nanomater 3:95. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/40108410.1155/2012/401084 ↗
88. Golub EE, Boesze-Battaglia K (2007) The role of alkaline phosphatase in mineralization. Curr Opin Orthop 18(5):444–44810.1097/BCO.0b013e3282630851 ↗
89. Tanahashi M, Matsuda T (1997) Surface functional group dependence on apatite formation on self-assembled monolayers in a simulated body fluid. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 34(3):305–31510.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19970305)34:3<305::AID-JBM5>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
90. Varma HK, Yokogawa Y, Espinosa FF, Kawamoto Y, Nishizawa K, Nagata F, Kameyama T (1999) Porous calcium phosphate coating over phosphorylated chitosan film by a biomimetic method. Biomaterials 20(9):879–88410.1016/S0142-9612(98)00243-9 ↗
91. Bastiaansen-Jenniskens YM, de Bart ACW, Koevoet W et al (2010) Elevated levels of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein during in vitro cartilage matrix generation decrease collagen fibril diameter. Cartilage 1(3):200–21010.1177/1947603510361238 ↗