Effect of composition on phase morphology and mechanical properties of PP/PA66 in situ composites via extrusion-drawing-injection method
Source abstract
Abstract
The reinforced and toughened PP/PA66 in situ composites were prepared via extrusion-drawing-injection method. The relationship among composition, phase morphology and mechanical properties, together with their functional mechanism, was investigated. The results show that in the range of PA66 weight fraction (fw) from 0 to 20% and under the experimental processing conditions, the main changes in phase morphology of the composites with fw are that the number of in situ formed PA66 microfibers and remained PA66 particles increases with fw whereas the fiber transverse size and its dispersity decrease till fw = 15% and then increase. This can be attributed to the combined effect of break-up, coalescence and deformation of the PA66 phase in the PP phase in the course of extrusion and drawing. The tensile strength of composites has a maximum value at fw of 15% and Young's modulus increases with fw up to a plateau level, while impact strength continuously rises with fw, an effect which can be ascribed to the distinct dependence of these properties on the phase-morphological factors mentioned above.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. G. Kiss, Polym. Eng. Sci. 27 (1987) 410.10.1002/pen.760270606 ↗
2. A. Mehta and A. I. Isayev, ibid. 31 (1991) 971.10.1002/pen.760311307 ↗
3. M. Evastatiev, J. M. Schultz and S. Petrovich, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 67 (1998) 723.
4. M. Evastatiev, J. M. Schultz, S. Fakirov et al., Polym. Eng. Sci. 41 (2001) 192.10.1002/pen.10721 ↗
5. X. Li, M. Chen et al., Polym. J. 29 (1997) 975.10.1295/polymj.29.975 ↗
6. X. Li, M. Chen et al., Polym. Eng. Sci. 39 (1999) 881.10.1002/pen.11477 ↗
7. M. Chen, Y. Huang, S. Zhao et al., Chinese J. Appl. Chem 12(6) (1995) 77.10.3724/j.issn.1000-0518.1995.6.77 ↗
8. B. R. Liang, J. L. White, J. E. Spruiell et al., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 28 (1983) 2011.10.1002/app.1983.070280616 ↗
9. M. V. Tsebrenko, G. P. Danilova and A. Y. Malkin, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 31 (1989) 1.10.1016/0377-0257(89)80011-4 ↗
10. R. Gonzalez-Nunez, D. de Kee and B. D. Favis, Polymer 37(21) (1996) 4689.10.1016/S0032-3861(96)00318-7 ↗
11. B. D. Favis and J. M. Willis, J. Polym. Sci. Part B:Polym. Phys. 28 (1990) 2259.10.1002/polb.1990.090281208 ↗
12. J. M. Willis, V. Caldas and B. D. Favis, J. Mater. Sci. 26 (1991) 4742.10.1007/BF00612413 ↗
13. R. Gonzalez-Nunez, B. D. Favis and P. J. Carreau, Polym. Eng. Sci. 33(13) (1993) 851.10.1002/pen.760331310 ↗
14. N. Chapleau and B. D. Favis, J. Mater. Sci. 30 (1995) 142.10.1007/BF00352143 ↗
15. E. D. Williams, L. S. Schadler and A. Lustiger, Ann. Tech. Conf.-ANTEC, Conf. Proc., 1998 Soc. Plast. Eng. 2 (1998) 2266.