journal article·2010-08

Yield stress of SiC reinforced aluminum alloy composites

Min Song, Yuehui He, Shanfeng Fang

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 45· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

This article develops a constitutive model for the yield stress of SiC reinforced aluminum alloy composites based on the modified shear lag model, Eshelby’s equivalent inclusion approach, and Weibull statistics. The SiC particle debonding and cracking during deformation have been incorporated into the model. It has been shown that the yield stress of the composites increases as the volume fraction and aspect ratio of the SiC particles increase, while it decreases as the size of the SiC particles increases. Four types of aluminum alloys, including pure aluminum, Al–Mg–Si alloy, Al–Cu–Mg alloy, and Al–Zn–Mg alloy, have been chosen as the matrix materials to verify the model accuracy. The comparisons between the model predictions and the experimental counterparts indicate that the present model predictions agree much better with the experimental data than the traditional modified shear lag model predictions. The present model indicates that particle failure has important effect on the yield stress of the SiC reinforced aluminum alloy composites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Cox HL (1952) Br J Appl Phys 3:7210.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302 ↗
2. Kelly A (1973) Strong solids. Clarendon Press, Oxford, p 147
3. Nardone VC (1987) Scr Metall 21:131310.1016/0036-9748(87)90105-0 ↗
4. Nardone VC, Prewo KM (1986) Scr Metall 20:4310.1016/0036-9748(86)90210-3 ↗
5. Taya M, Arsenault RJ (1987) Scr Metall 21:34910.1016/0036-9748(87)90227-4 ↗
6. Arsenault RJ, Fisher RM (1983) Scr Metall 17:6710.1016/0036-9748(83)90072-8 ↗
7. Arsenault RJ, Shi N (1986) Mater Sci Eng 81:17510.1016/0025-5416(86)90261-2 ↗
8. Miller WS, Humphreys FJ (1991) Scr Metall Mater 25:3310.1016/0956-716X(91)90349-6 ↗
9. González C, Llora J (1996) Scr Mater 35:9110.1016/1359-6462(96)00100-5 ↗
10. Lewis CA, Withers PJ (1995) Acta Metall Mater 43:368510.1016/0956-7151(95)90152-3 ↗
11. Llorca J (1995) Acta Metall Mater 43:18110.1016/0956-7151(95)90273-2 ↗
12. Maire E, Wilkinson DS, Embury JD, Fougeres R (1997) Acta Mater 45:526110.1016/S1359-6454(97)00147-X ↗
13. Withers PJ, Stobbs WM, Pedersen OB (1989) Acta Metall 37:306110.1016/0001-6160(89)90341-6 ↗
14. McElro TJ, Szkopiak ZC (1972) Inter Metall Rev 17:17510.1179/095066072790137684 ↗
15. Sekine H, Chen R (1995) Composites 26:18310.1016/0010-4361(95)91381-E ↗
16. Ashby MF (1970) Philos Mag 21:39910.1080/14786437008238426 ↗
17. Liews CA, Stobbs WM, Withers PJ (1993) Mater Sci Eng A 171:110.1016/0921-5093(93)90387-T ↗
18. Tohgo K, Weng GJ (1994) Trans ASME J Eng Mater Technol 116:41410.1115/1.2904307 ↗
19. Lee HK (2001) Comp Mech 27:50410.1007/s004660100262 ↗
20. Shimbo M, Naka M, Okamoto I (1989) J Mater Sci Lett 8:66310.1007/BF01730435 ↗
21. Brown LM, Clarke DR (1975) Acta Metall 23:82110.1016/0001-6160(75)90198-4 ↗
22. Song M, Li X, Chen KH (2007) Metall Mater Trans A 38:63810.1007/s11661-006-9064-7 ↗
23. Hong S, Kim H, Huh D, Suryanarayana C, Chun BS (2003) Mater Sci Eng A 347:19810.1016/S0921-5093(02)00593-2 ↗
24. Arsenault RJ, Wang L, Feng CR (1991) Acta Metall Mater 39:4710.1016/0956-7151(91)90327-W ↗
25. Dutta I, Bourell DL (1989) Mater Sci Eng A 112:6710.1016/0921-5093(89)90345-6 ↗
26. Nieh TG, Karlak RF (1984) Scr Metall 18:2510.1016/0036-9748(84)90083-8 ↗
27. Papazian JM (1988) Metall Trans A 19:294510.1007/BF02647721 ↗
28. Varma VK, Mahajan YR, Kutumnarao VV (1997) Scr Mater 37:48510.1016/S1359-6462(97)00107-3 ↗