journal article·2026-03-10Open access

Al-Doped Rutile TiO 2 with Y 2 O 3 –ZrO 2 Stacks Achieving Thin Thickness and Low Leakage for Dynamic Random-Access Memory Capacitors

Tae Kyun Kim, Heewon Paik, Jonghoon Shin, Haewon Song, Dae Seon Kwon, Cheol Seong Hwang

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide This study investigates Al-doped TiO 2 /Y 2 O 3 /ZrO 2 trilayer capacitors grown by atomic layer deposition as a feasible material to scale high- k dielectric films for dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) capacitors. An ultrathin Y 2 O 3 insertion layer (<0.5 nm) at the TiO 2 /ZrO 2 interface facilitated the formation of a high- k tetragonal/cubic–like ZrO 2 phase at ultrathin thicknesses, as verified by equivalent oxide thickness (EOT)–physical oxide thickness (POT) analysis, grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction, and transmission electron microscopy analysis. Such an enhanced crystallization enabled achieving a higher bulk k at a smaller POT and improved leakage properties. Postmetallization annealing (PMA) conditions were optimized for back-end-of-line compatibility, with PMA at 400 °C for 30 s in N 2 providing adequate interfacial curing, minimal EOT increase, and a lower leakage current. In contrast, PMA at 400 °C for 30 min resulted in EOT growth driven by intermixing, and PMA at 600 °C for 30 s enhanced crystallinity but increased leakage due to grain-boundary-assisted conduction. Temperature-dependent transport revealed that the dominant mechanism is bulk-limited Poole–Frenkel emission in the ZrO 2 layer for both bias polarities, while the leakage magnitude is modulated by asymmetric injection conditions at the Ru/Al-doped TiO 2 and ZrO 2 /TiN interfaces. Poole–Frenkel analysis yielded a consistent trap depth of ∼1.1 eV and physically reasonable optical dielectric constants for ZrO 2 -based dielectrics. With Y 2 O 3 insertion and short-time PMA at 400 °C, the Al-doped TiO 2 /Y 2 O 3 /ZrO 2 film achieved a minimum EOT of ∼0.63 nm at a POT of ∼6.0 nm, outperforming other ZrO 2 -based stacks at comparable thickness while maintaining acceptable leakage. Overall, interfacial Y 2 O 3 insertion combined with optimized PMA provided a practical pathway to achieve a lower POT at a given EOT in rutile TiO 2 -based next-generation DRAM capacitors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Inter-University Semiconductor Research Center

Seoul National University

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering

Sookmyung Women’s University

Funding

Next-Generation Intelligence Semiconductor Foundation

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/3502324310.1038/35023243 ↗
2. 10.1016/B978-0-12-820758-1.00015-710.1016/B978-0-12-820758-1.00015-7 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.181283210.1063/1.1812832 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.360987510.1063/1.3609875 ↗
5. 10.1109/IITC-AMC.2017.796896310.1109/IITC-AMC.2017.7968963 ↗
6. 10.1557/jmr.2012.23110.1557/jmr.2012.231 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ssc.2008.05.01810.1016/j.ssc.2008.05.018 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20070108510.1002/adma.200701085 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.03.01810.1016/j.matlet.2019.03.018 ↗
10. 10.1039/D5TC01401H10.1039/D5TC01401H ↗
11. 10.1021/am506677e10.1021/am506677e ↗
12. 10.1557/mrs.2018.9510.1557/mrs.2018.95 ↗
13. 10.1021/cm101028910.1021/cm1010289 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.sse.2007.09.03010.1016/j.sse.2007.09.030 ↗
15. 10.1002/admt.20220087810.1002/admt.202200878 ↗
16. 10.1002/pssr.20190028210.1002/pssr.201900282 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.04.01710.1016/j.tsf.2010.04.017 ↗
18. 10.1109/TDMR.2012.220405810.1109/TDMR.2012.2204058 ↗
19. 10.1021/am501247u10.1021/am501247u ↗
20. 10.1143/JJAP.44.614810.1143/JJAP.44.6148 ↗
21. 10.1002/aelm.20220009910.1002/aelm.202200099 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.renene.2013.08.04310.1016/j.renene.2013.08.043 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.23210.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.232 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1156010.1103/PhysRevB.49.11560 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00808.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00808.x ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00885.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00885.x ↗
27. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00385-310.1016/S1359-6454(02)00385-3 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.212470810.1063/1.2124708 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0022-0248(02)02133-410.1016/S0022-0248(02)02133-4 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.161303110.1063/1.1613031 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10854-019-02598-x10.1007/s10854-019-02598-x ↗
32. 10.1116/1.476504710.1116/1.4765047 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.156746010.1063/1.1567460 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.486187610.1063/1.4861876 ↗
35. 10.1038/s41467-023-41868-510.1038/s41467-023-41868-5 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.tsf.2020.13826210.1016/j.tsf.2020.138262 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.365787910.1063/1.3657879 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.480467010.1063/1.4804670 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.07.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.07.001 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41467-024-53014-w10.1038/s41467-024-53014-w ↗
41. Vickerman J. C. · 2013
42. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0259610.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02596 ↗
43. 10.1116/6.000247710.1116/6.0002477 ↗
44. 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.350203610.1109/ACCESS.2024.3502036 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.08511410.1103/PhysRevB.78.085114 ↗
46. 10.1116/6.000107810.1116/6.0001078 ↗
47. 10.1063/5.013105010.1063/5.0131050 ↗
48. Sze S. M. · 2002
49. 10.1063/1.221317010.1063/1.2213170 ↗
50. 10.1039/C9CP03322J10.1039/C9CP03322J ↗
51. 10.1063/1.494153710.1063/1.4941537 ↗
52. 10.1109/TED.2017.278512010.1109/TED.2017.2785120 ↗
53. 10.1063/1.165602210.1063/1.1656022 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.07210.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.072 ↗
55. 10.1063/1.36593810.1063/1.365938 ↗