Quantifying the role of interface atomic structure in the compressive response of Ti2AlN/TiAl composite using MD simulations
Source abstract
Abstract
Unraveling the effects of interface atomic structures on the mechanical properties is a key step toward the elaborate design of Ti2AlN/TiAl composite with excellent performance. However, the impact of different interface atomic structures upon the mechanical properties of Ti2AlN/TiAl composite, which is extremely important from the perspective of material design, remains poorly understood and essentially unquantified so far. In this research work, molecular dynamics simulations of Ti2AlN(0001)/TiAl(111) coherent interface and $$ {\text{Ti}}2 {\text{AlN}}(10{\bar{\text{1}}}3)/{\text{TiAl}}\left( {111} \right) $$ incoherent interface system under parallel-to-interface compression are carried out. It is found that these two types of interface systems show different compressive deformation behaviors due to significantly different interface–dislocation interactive mechanisms. The compressive ultimate strengths of Ti2AlN(0001)/TiAl(111) coherent interface and $$ {\text{Ti}}2 {\text{AlN}}(10{\bar{\text{1}}}3)/{\text{TiAl}}\left( {111} \right) $$ incoherent interface systems are comparable, but the ductility of incoherent interface system is obviously higher than that of coherent interface system. This is because the incoherent interface can simultaneously serve as the source for dislocation nucleation and the barrier for dislocation motion, and thus plays a dual role of softening and hardening in the compressive deformation. Therefore, it can be expected that tuning the interface with $$ {\text{Ti}}2 {\text{AlN}}(10{\bar{\text{1}}}3)/{\text{TiAl}}\left( {111} \right) $$ incoherent atomic structure can contribute to increasing the compressive ductility of Ti2AlN/TiAl composite without lowering its strength.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Appel F, Clemens H, Fischer FD (2016) Modeling concepts for intermetallic titanium aluminides. Prog Mater Sci 81:55–12410.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.01.001 ↗
2. Chen G, Peng YB, Zheng G, Qi ZX, Wang MZ, Yu HC, Dong CL, Liu CT (2016) Polysynthetic twinned TiAl single crystals for high-temperature applications. Nat Mater 15:876–88210.1038/nmat4677 ↗
3. Kothari K, Radhakrishnan R, Wereley NM (2012) Advances in gamma titanium aluminides and their manufacturing techniques. Prog Aerosp Sci 55:1–1610.1016/j.paerosci.2012.04.001 ↗
4. Song L, Lin JP, Li JS (2017) Effects of trace alloying elements on the phase transformation behaviors of ordered ω phases in high Nb–TiAl alloys. Mater Des 113:47–5310.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.004 ↗
5. Li W, Yang Y, Liu J, Zhou Y, Li M, Wen SF, Wei QS, Yan CZ, Shi YS (2017) Enhanced nanohardness and new insights into texture evolution and phase transformation of TiAl/TiB2 in situ metal matrix composites prepared via selective laser melting. Acta Mater 136:90–10410.1016/j.actamat.2017.07.003 ↗
6. Lapin J, Klimová A, Gabalcová Z, Pelachová T, Bajana O, Štamborská M (2017) Microstructure and mechanical properties of cast in situ TiAl matrix composites reinforced with (Ti, Nb)2AlC particles. Mater Des 133:404–41510.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.012 ↗
7. Lu ZL, Cao JW, Bai SZ, Wang MY, Li DC (2015) Microstructure and mechanical properties of TiAl-based composites prepared by Stereolithography and gelcasting technologies. J Alloys Compd 633:280–28710.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.191 ↗
8. Lapin J, Kamyshnykova K (2018) Processing, microstructure and mechanical properties of in situ Ti3Al + TiAl matrix composite reinforced with Ti2AlC particles prepared by centrifugal casting. Intermetallics 98:34–4410.1016/j.intermet.2018.04.012 ↗
9. Liu P, Han XL, Sun DL, Wang Q (2018) First-principles investigation on the structures, energies, electronic and defective properties of Ti2AlN surfaces. Appl Surf Sci 433:1056–106610.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.112 ↗
10. Duong TC, Singh N, Arróyave R (2013) First-principles calculations of finite-temperature elastic properties of Ti2AlX (X = C or N). Comput Mater Sci 79:296–30210.1016/j.commatsci.2013.06.033 ↗
11. Sun DL, Sun T, Wang Q, Han XL, Guo Q, Wu GH (2014) Fabrication of in situ Ti2AlN/TiAl composites by reaction hot pressing and their properties. J Wuhan Univ Technol-Mater Sci Ed 29:126–13010.1007/s11595-014-0879-6 ↗
12. Sun T, Wang Q, Sun DL, Wu GH, Na Y (2010) Study on dry sliding friction and wear properties of Ti2AlN/TiAl composite. Wear 268:693–69910.1016/j.wear.2009.11.007 ↗
13. Liu YW, Hu R, Zhang TB, Kou HC, Li JS (2014) Microstructure characterization and mechanical properties of in situ synthesized Ti2AlN/Ti48Al2Cr2Nb composites. Adv Eng Mater 16:507–51010.1002/adem.201300417 ↗
14. Liu YW, Hu R, Yang JR, Li JS (2017) Tensile properties and fracture behavior of in situ synthesized Ti2AlN/Ti48Al2Cr2Nb composites at room and elevated temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A 679:7–1310.1016/j.msea.2016.09.105 ↗
15. Beyerlein IJ, Demkowicz MJ, Misra A, Uberuaga BP (2015) Defect-interface interactions. Prog Mater Sci 74:125–21010.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.02.001 ↗
16. Liu N, Liu XY (2018) Review: mechanical behavior of metal/ceramic interfaces in nanolayered composites—experiments and modeling. J Mater Sci 53:5562–5583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1767-110.1007/s10853-017-1767-1 ↗
17. Wang J, Misra A (2011) An overview of interface-dominated deformation mechanisms in metallic multilayers. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 15:20–2810.1016/j.cossms.2010.09.002 ↗
18. Zhang XM, Zhang B, Mu Y, Shao S, Wick CD, Ramachandran BR, Meng WJ (2017) Mechanical failure of metal/ceramic interfacial regions under shear loading. Acta Mater 138:224–23610.1016/j.actamat.2017.07.053 ↗
19. Lu K, Lu L, Suresh S (2009) Strengthening materials by engineering coherent internal boundaries at the nanoscale. Science 324:349–35210.1126/science.1159610 ↗
20. Li N, Wang H, Misra A, Wang J (2014) In situ nanoindentation study of plastic co-deformation in Al–TiN nanocomposites. Sci Rep 4:663310.1038/srep06633 ↗
21. Liu P, Sun DL, Han XL, Wang Q (2017) Investigation on the crystallographic orientation relationships and interface atomic structures in an in situ Ti2AlN/TiAl composite. Mater Des 130:239–24910.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.061 ↗
22. Medyanik SN, Shao S (2009) Strengthening effects of coherent interfaces in nanoscale metallic bilayers. Comput Mater Sci 45:1129–113310.1016/j.commatsci.2009.01.013 ↗
23. Salehinia I, Wang J, Bahr DF, Zbib HM (2014) Molecular dynamics simulations of plastic deformation in Nb/NbC multilayers. Int J Plast 59:119–13210.1016/j.ijplas.2014.03.010 ↗
24. Zhang RF, Wang J, Beyerlein IJ, Misra A, Germann TC (2012) Atomic-scale study of nucleation of dislocation from fcc-bcc interfaces. Acta Mater 60:2855–286510.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.050 ↗
25. Liu P, Han XL, Sun DL, Chen ZH, Wang Q (2018) Adhesion, stability and electronic properties of Ti2AlN(0001)/TiAl(111) coherent interface from first-principles calculation. Intermetallics 96:49–5710.1016/j.intermet.2018.02.012 ↗
26. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–1910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
27. Liu P, Han XL, Sun DL, Wang Q (2018) Development and application of a ternary Ti-Al-N interatomic potential for Ti2AlN/TiAl composite. J Alloys Compd 745:63–7410.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.168 ↗
28. Stukowski A (2012) Structure identification methods for atomistic simulations of crystalline materials. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 20:04502110.1088/0965-0393/20/4/045021 ↗
29. Stukowski A, Bulatov VV, Arsenlis A (2012) Automated identification and indexing of dislocations in crystal interfaces. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 20:08500710.1088/0965-0393/20/8/085007 ↗
30. Chen XY, Kong XF, Misra A, Legut D, Yao BN, Germann TC, Zhang RF (2018) Effect of dynamic evolution of misfit dislocation pattern on dislocation nucleation and shear sliding at semi-coherent bimetal interfaces. Acta Mater 143:107–12010.1016/j.actamat.2017.10.012 ↗
31. Béjaud R, Durinck J, Brochard S (2018) Twin-interface interactions in nanostructured Cu/Ag: molecular dynamics study. Acta Mater 144:314–32410.1016/j.actamat.2017.10.036 ↗
32. Kabiri Y, Schrenker N, Müller J, Mačković M, Spiecker E (2017) Direct observation of dislocation formation and plastic anisotropy in Nb2AlC MAX phase using in situ nanomechanics in transmission electron microscopy. Scr Mater 137:104–10810.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.04.015 ↗
33. Barsoum MW, Zhen T, Kalidindi SR, Radovic M, Murugaiah A (2003) Fully reversible, dislocation-based compressive deformation of Ti3SiC2 to 1 GPa. Nat Mater 2:107–11110.1038/nmat814 ↗
34. Gruber J, Lang AC, Griggs J, Taheri ML, Tucker GJ, Barsoum MW (2016) Evidence for bulk ripplocations in layered solids. Sci Rep 6:3345110.1038/srep33451 ↗
35. Barsoum MW, Tucker GJ (2017) Deformation of layered solids: ripplocations not basal dislocations. Scr Mater 139:166–17210.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.04.002 ↗
36. Griggs J, Lang AC, Gruber J, Tucker GJ, Taheri ML, Barsoum MW (2017) Spherical nanoindentation, modeling and transmission electron microscopy evidence for ripplocations in Ti3SiC2. Acta Mater 131:141–15510.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.055 ↗
37. Shao S, Medyanik SN (2010) Interaction of dislocations with incoherent interfaces in nanoscale FCC-BCC metallic bi-layers. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 18:05501010.1088/0965-0393/18/5/055010 ↗
38. Wang J, Hoagland RG, Hirth JP, Mira A (2008) Atomistic modeling of the interaction of glide dislocations with “weak” interfaces. Acta Mater 56:5685–569310.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.041 ↗
39. Zbib HM, Overman CT, Akasheh F, Bahr D (2011) Analysis of plastic deformation in nanoscale metallic multilayers with coherent and incoherent interfaces. Int J Plast 27:1618–163910.1016/j.ijplas.2011.03.006 ↗