journal article·2009-03

Volume fraction effect on high strain rate properties of syntactic foam composites

E. Woldesenbet, S. Peter

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

The volume fraction effect on the high strain rate compressive properties of syntactic foams is characterized using a pulse-shaped Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) technique. Eighteen different types of syntactic foams are fabricated with the same matrix resin system but six different microballoon volume fractions and three different size microballoons. The volume fractions of the microballoons in the syntactic foams are maintained at 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6. The microballoons have the same mean outer radius of 40 μm, but different internal radii leading to a difference in their density. Analysis is carried out on the effect of microballoon volume fractions on the high strain rate properties for each type of syntactic foam. This approach is helpful in understanding the effect of microballoon reinforcement at different volume fractions on the dynamic compressive properties of syntactic foams. The results at high strain rates are compared to quasi-static strain rate compressive properties of the same material. The results show that there is a decrease in both compressive strength and modulus as the microballoon volume fraction increases for the same type of syntactic foam at all strain rates. However, at strain rates of quasi-static and 450/s, the decrease tends to be gradual across all volume fractions, while for strain rates of 800/s, there is a dramatic decrease from 10 to 20% followed by a gradual decline for most specimens. The fracture mode plays a major role in the dynamic behavior of syntactic foams.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1997) Cellular solids, structures and properties. Cambridge, UK10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
2. Ashida K (1995) Handbook of plastic foams: types, properties, manufacture and applications. New Jersey
3. Karthikeyan CS, Kishor, Sankaran S (2001) J Reinf Plast Comp 20(11):98210.1106/YRCW-7TT8-HBXW-767B ↗
4. Gupta N, Woldesenbet E (2003) Compos Struct 61:31110.1016/S0263-8223(03)00060-6 ↗
5. Shutov FV (1986) Adv Polym Sci 73:6310.1007/3-540-15786-7_7 ↗
6. Kim HH, Oh HH (2000) J Appl Polym Sci 76:132410.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000523)76:8<1324::AID-APP13>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
7. Smiley LH (1986) Mater Eng 103:27
8. Noor AK, Burton WS, Bert CW (1996) Appl Mech Rev 49:15510.1115/1.3101923 ↗
9. Gupta N, Kishore, Woldesenbet E, Sankaran S (2001) J Mater Sci 36:4485. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101798682060310.1023/A:1017986820603 ↗
10. Corigliano A, Rizzi E, Papa E (2000) Compos Sci Technol 60:216910.1016/S0266-3538(00)00118-4 ↗
11. Narkis M, Puterman M, Kenig S (1980) J Cell Plast 16:32610.1177/0021955X8001600603 ↗
12. Gupta N, Woldesenbet E (2004) J Cell Plast 40:46110.1177/0021955X04048421 ↗
13. Karthikeyan CS, Sankaran S, Jagdish Kumar MN et al (2001) J Appl Poly Sci 81:40510.1002/app.1452 ↗
14. Rizzi E, Papa E, Corignlina A (2000) Int J Solids Struct 37:577310.1016/S0020-7683(99)00264-4 ↗
15. Bunn R, Mottram JT (1993) Composites 24(7):56510.1016/0010-4361(93)90270-I ↗
16. Progelhof RC. In Proceedings of Instrumented Impact Testing of Plastics and Composite Materials, Houston, March (ASTM), p 105
17. Sounik DF, Gansen P, Clemons JL et al (1997) J Mater Manuf 106(5):211
18. Chen W, Lu F, Winfree N (2002) Exp Mech 42(1):6210.1007/BF02411053 ↗
19. Rinde A, Hoge KG (1971) J Appl Polym Sci 15:137710.1002/app.1971.070150608 ↗
20. Baker WE, Togami TC, Weider JC (1998) Int J Impact Eng 21(3):14910.1016/S0734-743X(97)00040-7 ↗
21. Zhao H, Gary G (1998) Int J Impact Eng 21(10):82710.1016/S0734-743X(98)00034-7 ↗
22. Song B, Chen W, Frew DJ (2004) J Compos Mater 38:91510.1177/0021998304040552 ↗
23. Woldesenbet E, Gupta N, Jadhav A (2005) J Mater Sci 40:4009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-1910-210.1007/s10853-005-1910-2 ↗
24. Cohen A, Yalvac S, Wetters DG (1992) In: 37th International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition, Anaheim, CA, March 1992, (SAMPE), p 641
25. Hiel C, Dittman D, Ishai O (1993) Composites 24:44710.1016/0010-4361(93)90253-5 ↗
26. Ishai O, Hiel CJ (1992) J Compos Technol Res 14:15510.1520/CTR10093J ↗
27. Gupta N, Woldesenbet E, Kishore (2002) J Mater Sci 37:3199. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101616652984110.1023/A:1016166529841 ↗
28. Kolsky H (1949) Proc Phys Soc B62:67610.1088/0370-1301/62/11/302 ↗
29. Kaiser MA, Wicks A, Wilson et al (1998) Thesis Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, p 1
30. Gama BA, Gillespie JW, Hassan M et al (2001) J Compos Mater 35:120110.1177/002199801772662299 ↗
31. Lindholm US (1964) J Mech Phys Solids 12:31710.1016/0022-5096(64)90028-6 ↗
32. Gilat A, Goldberg RK, Roberts GD (2002) Compos Sci Technol 62:146910.1016/S0266-3538(02)00100-8 ↗
33. Woldesenbet E, Vinson JR (1999) AIAA J 37:110210.2514/2.820 ↗
34. Woldesenbet E, Vinson JR (2001) J Compos Mater 35:50910.1177/002199801772662136 ↗
35. Woldesenbet E, Peters S (2007) In: the Proceedings of the 22nd American Society for Composites Conference, Seattle, Washington