journal article·2009-12

Antimicrobial activity of novel biocompatible wound dressings based on triblock copolymer hydrogels

Karima Bertal, Joanna Shepherd, C. W. Ian Douglas, Jeppe Madsen, Andrew Morse, Steve Edmondson, Steven P. Armes, Andrew Lewis, Sheila MacNeil

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 23
Publisher page

Abstract

Wound infection is a common complication often resulting in delayed healing with adverse clinical and financial consequences. Current antimicrobial treatments are far from ideal, side effects can include both bacterial resistance and toxicity. As a result, a great deal of effort over the last 20 years has been spent on investigating new forms of antimicrobial dressings. Here, we report the unexpected antimicrobial activity of a relatively new biocompatible thermo-responsive PHPMA-PMPC-PHPMA triblock copolymer gelator [where PHPMA denotes poly(2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate) and PMPC denotes poly(2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl phosphorylcholine)]. In a radial diffusion assay, a 20% w/v copolymer gel produced an inhibitory zone up to six times greater than the corresponding control against Staphylococcus aureus. Similarly, in a broth inhibition assay the same copolymer reduced bacterial growth by 45% compared with control experiments conducted in the absence of any copolymer. Moreover, addition of the copolymer to a 3D-infected skin model reduced bacterial recovery by 38% compared to that of controls over 24-48 h. This is particularly relevant since these antimicrobial triblock copolymers were recently shown to be non-toxic when exposed to a tissue-engineered skin model. This antimicrobial activity was also successfully immobilised by grafting PMPC-PHPMA diblock copolymer brushes onto silicon wafers. Our results indicate that both PMPC-PHPMA diblock and PHPMA homopolymer brushes exhibit antimicrobial activity. Our hypothesis for the mode of action is that the moderately hydrophobic PHPMA chains penetrate the bacterial membrane, causing leakage of the cell contents. In summary, these gels and surfaces offer a promising new approach to antimicrobial dressings. © 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Antimicrobial agents and applications · Wound Healing and Treatments · Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Farage MA, Miller KW, Elsner P, Maibach HI (2008) Aging Clin Exp Res 20:19510.1007/BF03324769 ↗
2. Singer AJ, Clark RAF (1999) New Engl J Med 341:73810.1056/NEJM199909023411006 ↗
3. Scheinfeld N (2005) Dermatol Online J 11(3):810.5070/D39X6912PV ↗
4. Bowler PG, Duerden BI, Amstrong DG (2001) Clin Microbiol Rev 14:24410.1128/CMR.14.2.244-269.2001 ↗
5. Hermans HM (2006) Am J Nurs 106:6010.1097/00000446-200612000-00025 ↗
6. Atiyeh BS, Costagliola M, Hayek SN, Dibo SA (2007) Burns 33:13910.1016/j.burns.2006.06.010 ↗
7. Faulkner DM, Sutton ST, Hesford JD, Faulkner CB, Major DA, Hellewell TB, Laughon MM, Rodeheaver GT, Edlich RF (1997) Am J Emerg Med 15:2010.1016/S0735-6757(97)90041-3 ↗
8. Ilker FM, Nusslein K, Tew GN, Coughlin EB (2004) J Am Chem Soc 126:1587010.1021/ja045664d ↗
9. Eren T, Som A, Rennie JR, Nelson CF, Urgina Y, Nusslein K, Coughlin EB, Tew GN (2008) Macromol Chem Phys 209:51610.1002/macp.200700418 ↗
10. Kuroda K, Caputo GA, DeGrado WF (2009) Chemistry 15:112310.1002/chem.200801523 ↗
11. Madsen J, Armes SP, Lewis AL (2006) Macromolecules 39:745510.1021/ma062198z ↗
12. Madsen J, Armes SP, Bertal K, Lomas H, MacNeil S, Lewis AL (2008) Biomacromolecules 9:226510.1021/bm8005006 ↗
13. Shepherd J, Douglas I, Rimmer S, Swanson L, MacNeil S (2009) Tissue Eng Part C 15(3):47510.1089/ten.tec.2008.0614 ↗
14. Tsarevsky NV, Matyjaszewski K (2005) Macromolecules 38:308710.1021/ma050020r ↗
15. Tsarevsky NV, Matyjaszewski K (2002) Macromolecules 35:900910.1021/ma021061f ↗
16. Ostmark E, Harrison S, Wooley KL, Malmstrom EE (2007) Biomacromolecules 8:113810.1021/bm061043w ↗
17. Ghosh MM, Boyce SG, Layton C, Freedlander E, MacNeil S (1997) Ann Plast Surg 39:39010.1097/00000637-199710000-00010 ↗
18. Schaberg DR, Culver DH, Gaynes RP (1991) Am J Med 91:72S10.1016/0002-9343(91)90346-Y ↗
19. Fleischmann W, Meyer H, Baer AV (1996) J Hosp Infect 34:10710.1016/S0195-6701(96)90135-8 ↗
20. Eliott D, Kufera JA, Myers RA (2000) Am J Surg 179:36110.1016/S0002-9610(00)00360-3 ↗
21. Church D, Elsayeed S, Reid O, Winston B, Lindsay R (2006) Clin Microbiol Rev 19:40310.1128/CMR.19.2.403-434.2006 ↗
22. Jones MV, Herd TM, Christie HJ (1989) Microbios 58:49
23. Brogden KA (2005) Nat Rev Microbiol 3:23810.1038/nrmicro1098 ↗
24. Edlich RF, Schmolka IR, Prusak MP, Edgerton MT (1973) J Surg Res 14:27710.1016/0022-4804(73)90029-2 ↗
25. Rodeheaver GT, Kurtz L, Kircher BJ, Edlich RF (1980) Ann Emerg Med 11:57210.1016/S0196-0644(80)80228-9 ↗
26. Rodeheaver GT, Smith SL, Thacker JG, Edgerton MT, Edlich RF (1975) Am J Surg 129:24110.1016/0002-9610(75)90231-7 ↗
27. Holder IA, Durkee P, Supp AP, Boyce ST (2003) Burns 29:44510.1016/S0305-4179(03)00046-9 ↗
28. Martineau L, Dosch HM (2006) Burns 32:74810.1016/j.burns.2006.01.006 ↗
29. Jones SA, Bowler PG, Walker M, Parsons D (2004) Wound Repair Regen 12:28810.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.012304.x ↗
30. Steer JA, Papini RPG, Wilson APR, McGrouther DA, Parkhouse N (1996) Burns 22:17710.1016/0305-4179(95)00117-4 ↗
31. Kuroda K, DeGrado WF (2005) J Am Chem Soc 127:412810.1021/ja044205+ ↗
32. Madsen J, Armes SP, Bertal K, MacNeil S, Lewis A (2009) Biomacromolecules (in press)
33. Cerca N, Pier GB, Vilanova M, Oliveira R, Azeredo J (2005) Res Microbiol 156:50610.1016/j.resmic.2005.01.007 ↗
34. Tebbs SE, Elliott TSJ (1994) Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 13:11110.1007/BF01982182 ↗