Mechanical and dry sliding wear behavior of ultrafine-grained AISI 1024 steel processed using multiaxial forging
Source abstract
Abstract
AISI 1024 steel was severely deformed by using warm (500 °C) multiaxial forging (MAF) technique using up to nine forging passes in order obtain a composite ultrafine grained (UFG) microstructure consisting of fragmented cementite particles. Microstructural evolution is studied using optical and electron microscopy. After warm MAF, the hardness and strength properties improved significantly, although total elongation values decreased. The tribological properties of UFG low carbon steel produced by MAF have been investigated. Dry sliding was carried out using constant sliding speed. The wear test results showed that the strengthening of AISI 1024 steel by warm MAF processing did not lead to improvement of wear resistance. The results are explained on the basis of its microstructural features and lower pull-off work. Higher grain boundary density, presence of submicron-sized cementite particles, and lower pull-off work are found to be responsible for lower sliding wear resistance of UFG steel.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Belyakov A, Sakai T, Miura H, Kaibyshev R (2000) Scripta Mater 42:31910.1016/S1359-6462(99)00353-X ↗
2. Valiev RZ (1997) Mater Sci Eng A 234–236:5910.1016/S0921-5093(97)00183-4 ↗
3. La PQ, Ma JQ, Zhu YT, Yang J, Liu W, Xue Q, Valiev R (2005) Acta Mater 53:516710.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.031 ↗
4. Kim YS, Lee T, Park KT, Kim WJ, Shin DH (2002) TMS (UFG materials II, proceeding of a symposium, TMS annual meeting)
5. Kim YS, Ha JS, Shin DH (2005) Mater Sci Forum 475–479:40110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.475-479.401 ↗
6. Gao LL, Cheng X (2008) Wear 265(7–8):986
7. Garbacz H, Gradzka-Dahlke M, Kurzydłowski K (2007) Wear 263:57210.1016/j.wear.2006.11.047 ↗
8. Purcek G, Saray O, Kul O, Karaman I, Yapici G, Haouaoui M, Maier H (2009) Mater Sci Eng A 517:9710.1016/j.msea.2009.03.054 ↗
9. Stolyarov VV, Shuster LS, Migranov MS, Valiev RZ, Zhu YT (2004) Mater Sci Eng A 371:31310.1016/j.msea.2003.12.026 ↗
10. Padap AK, Chaudhari GP, Nath SK, Pancholi V (2009) Mater Sci Eng A 527:11010.1016/j.msea.2009.08.066 ↗
11. Lim SM, Wahabi ME, Desrayaud C, Montheillet F (2007) Adv Mater Res 5–17:900
12. Salishchev GA, Valiakhmetov OR, Galeyev RM (1993) J Mater Sci 28:2898. doi: 10.1007/BF0035469210.1007/BF00354692 ↗
13. Hyde TH, Sun W, Williams JA (2007) Int Mater Rev 52:21310.1179/174328007X160317 ↗
14. Song R, Ponge D, Raabe D, Kaspar R (2005) Acta Mater 53:84510.1016/j.actamat.2004.10.051 ↗
15. Hutchings IM (1992) Tribology: friction and wear of engineering materials. Edward Arnold, London, pp 26–83
16. Bhushan B (2002) Introduction to tribology. Wiley, New York, p 345
17. Wayne S, Rice S, Minakawa K, Nowotny H (1983) Wear 85:9310.1016/0043-1648(83)90338-1 ↗
18. Arnell RD, Davies PB, Halling J, Whomes TL (1991) Tribology principles and design application. Springer, New York, p 46