The influence of adhesive on the Al alloy in laser weld bonding Mg–Al process
Source abstract
Abstract
Laser weld bonding is a new welding technology, being used to join Mg–Al alloys. The penetration depth of LWB Mg–Al joint was larger than that in simply laser welding joint in same welding parameters. The temperature at the edge of the Al fusion zone in LWB Mg–Al joint was higher than that in laser welding joint, which was measured through the thermal couples. The laser-introduced plasma in LWB Mg–Al process is observed by the high-speed camera, which is different from that in laser welding process. The surface temperature and state of the Al alloy were changed because of the addition of the adhesive, thus the laser absorptive of Al alloy was increased in LWB process, comparing with that in laser welding process; and the decomposition of the adhesive would make a depression in the Al fusion zone, which would be beneficial to the formation of keyhole welding in LWB Mg–Al joint.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhao H, White DR, DebRoy T (1999) Int Mater Rev 44:238–26610.1179/095066099101528298 ↗
2. Hekmat-Ardakan A, Ajersch F, Chen X-G (2011) J Mater Sci 46:2370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-5084-110.1007/s10853-010-5084-1 ↗
3. Braun R (2006) Mater Sci Eng A 426:25010.1016/j.msea.2006.04.033 ↗
4. Song G, Luo Z (2011) Opt Laser Eng 49:8210.1016/j.optlaseng.2010.08.011 ↗
5. Hakamada M, Shimizu K, Yamashita T, Watazu A, Saito N et al (2010) J Mater Sci 45:719. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3990-x10.1007/s10853-009-3990-x ↗
6. Qi X, Gang S (2010) Mater Des 31:60510.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.043 ↗
7. Vaidya WV, Horstmann M, Ventzke V, Petrovski B, Koçak M et al (2010) J Mater Sci 45:6242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4719-610.1007/s10853-010-4719-6 ↗
8. Somasekharan AC, Murr LE (2004) Mater Charact 52:4910.1016/j.matchar.2004.03.005 ↗
9. Yan J, Xu Z (2005) Scr Mater 53:58510.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.04.022 ↗
10. Jiang JB, Zhang ZD (2008) J Alloys Compd 466:36810.1016/j.jallcom.2007.11.034 ↗
11. Dietrich D, Nickel D, Krause M, Lampke T, Coleman MP et al (2011) J Mater Sci 46:357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4841-510.1007/s10853-010-4841-5 ↗
12. Sato YS, Park SHC, Michiuchi M, Kokawa H (2004) Scr Mater 50:123310.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.02.002 ↗
13. Zhao LM, Zhang ZD (2008) Scr Mater 58:28310.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.10.006 ↗
14. Chen YC, Nakata K (2008) Scr Mater 58:43310.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.10.033 ↗
15. Liu L-M, Wang H-Y, Zhang Z-D (2007) Scr Mater 56:47310.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.11.034 ↗
16. Liu L, Wang H, Song G, Ye J (2007) J Mater Sci 42:565. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1068-610.1007/s10853-006-1068-6 ↗
17. Messler RW (2002) Ind Robot 29:13810.1108/01439910210419150 ↗
18. Mackwood AP, Craferb RC (2005) Opt Laser Technol 37:9910.1016/j.optlastec.2004.02.017 ↗
19. Anisimov SI, Khokhlov VA (1996) Instabilities in laser–matter interaction. CRC, Boca Raton
20. Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1980) Statistical physics, part I. Pergamon, Oxford
21. Semak V, Matsunawa A (1997) J Phys D Appl Phys 30:254110.1088/0022-3727/30/18/008 ↗