Synergistic cytotoxicity of low-energy ultrasound and innovative mesoporous silica-based sensitive nanoagents
Source abstract
Abstract
Low-energy ultrasound (LEUS) shows distinct potential as a safe therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment. Herein, mesoporous silica nanoparticles with closed-end cavities as sensitive nanoagents are prepared for effective cancer cell killing, when synergistically combined with mild LEUS (1 MHz, ≤1.0 W cm−2). The closed-end cavities can entrap gas bubbles, and provide a large number of cavitation nucleation sites, which could lead to drastically amplify ultrasonic cavitation effect by responding to the mild LEUS (1 MHz, ≤1.0 W cm−2). Significant killing effect against cancer cells is observed, when cells are treated by synergetic combination of mild LEUS and the nanoagents with closed-end cavities, showing distinct dose dependency on the nanoagents and irradiation intensity. Nevertheless, the killing effect is disappeared when the closed-end cavities are destructed. Moreover, no obvious cytotoxicity is observed when either the nanoagents or the LEUS is applied alone. The research may open up application opportunities of mild low-energy ultrasound for cancer therapy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications · Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Miller MW, Miller DL, Brayman AA (1996) A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. Ultrasound Med Biol 22:1131–115410.1016/S0301-5629(96)00089-0 ↗
2. Wang X, Chen HR, Zheng YY et al (2013) Au-nanoparticle coated mesoporous silica nanocapsule-based multifunctional platform for ultrasound mediated imaging, cytoclasis and tumor ablation. Biomaterials 34:2057–206810.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.044 ↗
3. Suslick KS (1990) Sonochemistry. Science 247:1439–144510.1126/science.247.4949.1439 ↗
4. Riesz P, Kondo T (1992) Free-radical formation induced by ultrasound and its biological implications. Free Radicl Bio Med 13:247–27010.1016/0891-5849(92)90021-8 ↗
5. Jones SF, Evans GM, Galvin KP (1999) Bubble nucleation from gas cavities—a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 80:27–5010.1016/S0001-8686(98)00074-8 ↗
6. Holland CK, Apfel RE (1990) Thresholds for transient cavitation produced by pulsed ultrasound in a controlled nuclei environment. J Acoust Soc Am 88:2059–206910.1121/1.400102 ↗
7. Man J, Shelton RM, Cooper PR, Landini G, Scheven BA (2012) Low intensity ultrasound stimulates osteoblast migration at different frequencies. J Bone Miner Metab 30:602–60710.1007/s00774-012-0368-y ↗
8. Wagstaffe SJ, Schiffter HA, Arora M, Coussios CC (2012) Sonosensitive nanoparticles for controlled instigation of cavitation and drug delivery by ultrasound. AIP Conf Proc 1481:426–43110.1063/1.4757372 ↗
9. Harle J, Mayia F, Olsen I, Salih V (2005) Effects of ultrasound on transforming growth factor-beta genes in bone cells. Eur Cells Mater 10:70–7610.22203/eCM.v010a08 ↗
10. Reher P, Doan N, Bradnock B, Meghji S, Harris M (1999) Effect of ultrasound on the production of IL-8, basic FGF and VEGF. Cytokine 11:416–42310.1006/cyto.1998.0444 ↗
11. terHaar G (2007) Therapeutic applications of ultrasound. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 93:111–12910.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.07.005 ↗
12. Park K, Hoffmeister B, Han DK, Hasty K (2007) Therapeutic ultrasound effects on interleukin-1 beta stimulated cartilage construct in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 33:286–29510.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.08.009 ↗
13. Pounder NM, Harrison AJ (2008) Low intensity pulsed ultrasound for fracture healing: a review of the clinical evidence and the associated biological mechanism of action. Ultrasonics 48:330–33810.1016/j.ultras.2008.02.005 ↗
14. Lejbkowicz F, Salzberg S (1997) Distinct sensitivity of normal and malignant cells to ultrasound in vitro. Environ Health Perspect 105:1575–157810.1289/ehp.97105s61575 ↗
15. Schuster A, Schwab T, Bischof M et al (2013) Cell specific ultrasound effects are dose and frequency dependent. Ann Anat 195:57–6710.1016/j.aanat.2012.03.008 ↗
16. Wang Y, Bai WK, Shen E, Hu B (2013) Sonoporation by low-frequency and low-power ultrasound enhances chemotherapeutic efficacy in prostate cancer cells in vitro. Oncol Lett 6:495–49810.3892/ol.2013.1389 ↗
17. Demos SM, Alkan-Onyuksel H, Kane BJ et al (1999) In vivo targeting of acoustically reflective liposomes for intravascular and transvascular ultrasonic enhancement. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:867–87510.1016/S0735-1097(98)00607-X ↗
18. Ward M, Wu JR, Chiu JF (1999) Ultrasound-induced cell lysis and sonoporation enhanced by contrast agents. J Acoust Soc Am 105:2951–295710.1121/1.426908 ↗
19. Feril LB, Kondo T, Zhao QL et al (2003) Enhancement of ultrasound-induced apoptosis and cell lysis by echo-contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:331–33710.1016/S0301-5629(02)00700-7 ↗
20. Ju HY, Roy RA, Murray TW (2013) Gold nanoparticle targeted photoacoustic cavitation for potential deep tissue imaging and therapy. Biomed Opt Express 4:66–7610.1364/BOE.4.000066 ↗
21. Sazgarnia A, Shanei A, Taheri AR et al (2013) Therapeutic effects of acoustic cavitation in the presence of gold nanoparticles on a colon tumor model. J Ultras Med 32:475–48310.7863/jum.2013.32.3.475 ↗
22. Zhao Y, Zhu YC, Fu JK, Wang LZ (2013) Effective cancer cell killing by hydrophobic nanovoid-enhanced cavitation under safe low-energy ultrasound. Chem Asian J. doi: 10.1002/asia.201301333
23. de Sousa A, Maria DA, de Sousa RG, de Sousa EMB (2010) Synthesis and characterization of mesoporous silica/poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) functional hybrid useful for drug delivery. J Mater Sci 45:1478–148610.1007/s10853-009-4106-3 ↗
24. Zhu YC, Fujiwara M (2007) Installing dynamic molecular photomechanics in mesopores: a multifunctional controlled-release nanosystem. Angew Chem Int Ed 46:2241–224410.1002/anie.200604850 ↗
25. Chen F, Zhu YC (2012) Chitosan enclosed mesoporous silica nanoparticles as drug nano-carriers: sensitive response to the narrow pH range. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 150:83–8910.1016/j.micromeso.2011.07.023 ↗
26. Han LB, Zhou Y, He T et al (2013) One-pot morphology-controlled synthesis of various shaped mesoporous silica nanoparticles. J Mater Sci 48:5718–572610.1007/s10853-013-7501-8 ↗
27. Lang Y, Finn DP, Pandit A, Walsh PJ (2012) Pharmacological activity of ibuprofen released from mesoporous silica. J Mater Sci Mater Med 23:73–8010.1007/s10856-011-4488-z ↗
28. Rosenholm JM, Sahlgren C, Linden M (2010) Towards multifunctional, targeted drug delivery systems using mesoporous silica nanoparticles—opportunities and challenges. Nanoscale 2:1870–188310.1039/c0nr00156b ↗
29. Tsai CP, Chen CY, Hung Y, Chang FH, Mou CY (2009) Monoclonal antibody-functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) for selective targeting breast cancer cells. J Mater Chem 19:5737–574310.1039/b905158a ↗
30. Ferris DP, Lu J, Gothard C et al (2011) Synthesis of biomolecule-modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles for targeted hydrophobic drug delivery to cancer cells. Small 7:1816–182610.1002/smll.201002300 ↗
31. Rosenholm J, Sahlgren C, Linden M (2010) Cancer-cell targeting and cell-specific delivery by mesoporous silica nanoparticles. J Mater Chem 20:2707–271310.1039/b920076b ↗
32. Chen Y, Chu C, Zhou Y et al (2011) Reversible pore-structure evolution in hollow silica nanocapsules: large pores for siRNA delivery and nanoparticle collecting. Small 7:2935–294410.1002/smll.201101055 ↗
33. Pesse AV, Warrier GR, Dhir VK (2005) An experimental study of the gas entrapment process in closed-end microchannels. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 48:5150–516510.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2005.07.020 ↗
34. Chappell MA, Payne SJ (2007) The effect of cavity geometry on the nucleation of bubbles from cavities. J Acoust Soc Am 121:853–86210.1121/1.2404629 ↗
35. Gelderblom H, Zijlstra AG, van Wijngaarden L, Prosperetti A (2012) Oscillations of a gas pocket on a liquid-covered solid surface. Phys Fluids. doi: 10.1063/1.4769179
36. Borkent BM, Gekle S, Prosperetti A, Lohse D (2009) Nucleation threshold and deactivation mechanisms of nanoscopic cavitation nuclei. Phys Fluids. doi: 10.1063/1.3249602
37. Mark G, Tauber A, Rudiger LA et al (1998) OH-radical formation by ultrasound in aqueous solution-Part II: terephthalate and Fricke dosimetry and the influence of various conditions on the sonolytic yield. Ultrason Sonochem 5:41–5210.1016/S1350-4177(98)00012-1 ↗
38. Saran M, Summer KH (1999) Assaying for hydroxyl radicals: hydroxylated terephthalate is a superior fluorescence marker than hydroxylated benzoate. Free Radic Res 31:429–43610.1080/10715769900300991 ↗
39. Marschall HB, Morch KA, Keller AP, Kjeldsen M (2003) Cavitation inception by almost spherical solid particles in water. Phys Fluids 15:545–55310.1063/1.1535940 ↗
40. Feril LB, Kondo T (2004) Biological effects of low intensity ultrasound: the mechanism involved, and its implications on therapy and on biosafety of ultrasound. J Radiat Res 45:479–48910.1269/jrr.45.479 ↗
41. Mitragotri S (2005) Innovation-Healing sound: the use of ultrasound in drug delivery and other therapeutic applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov 4:255–26010.1038/nrd1662 ↗
42. Tang F, Li L, Chen D (2012) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles: synthesis, biocompatibility and drug delivery. Adv Mater 24:1504–153410.1002/adma.201104763 ↗
43. Lu J, Liong M, Li Z, Zink JI, Tamanoi F (2010) Biocompatibility, biodistribution, and drug-delivery efficiency of mesoporous silica nanoparticles for cancer therapy in animals. Small 6:1794–180510.1002/smll.201000538 ↗
44. Nicolas J, Mura S, Brambilla D, Mackiewicz N, Couvreur P (2013) Design, functionalization strategies and biomedical applications of targeted biodegradable/biocompatible polymer-based nanocarriers for drug delivery. Chem Soc Rev 42:1147–123510.1039/C2CS35265F ↗
45. Kroemer G, Jaattela M (2005) Lysosomes and autophagy in cell death control. Nat Rev Cancer 5:886–89710.1038/nrc1738 ↗
46. Chung MF, Chen KJ, Liang HF et al (2012) A liposomal system capable of generating CO2 bubbles to induce transient cavitation, lysosomal rupturing, and cell necrosis. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:10089–1009310.1002/anie.201205482 ↗