journal article·2010-03

Assessment of interface damage during the deformation of carbon nanotube composites

Chih-chuan Kao, Robert J. Young

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 45· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

The deformation micromechanics of single-walled carbon nanotubes in a polymeric matrix was studied through the use of Raman spectroscopy. The variation of stress sensitive G′ band positions was used to detect the interfacial adhesion between the nanotubes and the matrix when the composites were subjected to a cyclic deformation process. It was found that the level of the interfacial adhesion decreases with the maximum loading strain and the repeated loading cycles. The debonding phenomenon was saturated by the third cycle of loading of the composites up to 1.0% strain. A hysteresis loop was observed to develop due to the change of the stress transfer efficiency between the loading and the unloading steps when the sample was deformed over 0.4% strain. By analysing the loop area, the energy dissipated in the deformation of the composite materials was investigated and the extent of the interface damage was also assessed. © 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Smart Materials for Construction · Ion-surface interactions and analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Iijima S (1991) Nature 354:5610.1038/354056a0 ↗
2. Bethune DS, Kiang CH, de Vries MS, Gorman G, Savoy R, Vazquez J, Beyers R (1993) Nature 363:60510.1038/363605a0 ↗
3. Iijima S, Ichlhashi T (1993) Nature 363:60310.1038/363603a0 ↗
4. Krishnan A, Dujardin E, Ebbesen TW, Yianilos PN, Treacy MMJ (1998) Phys Rev B 58:1401310.1103/PhysRevB.58.14013 ↗
5. Yu MF, Files BS, Arepalli S, Ruoff RS (2000) Phys Rev Lett 84:555210.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5552 ↗
6. Cooper CA, Cohen SR, Barber AH, Wagner HD (2002) Appl Phys Lett 81:387310.1063/1.1521585 ↗
7. Barber AH, Cohen SR, Wagner HD (2003) Appl Phys Lett 82:414010.1063/1.1579568 ↗
8. Barber AH, Cohen SR, Kenig S, Wagner HD (2004) Compos Sci Technol 64:228310.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.023 ↗
9. Frogley MD, Ravich D, Wagner HD (2003) Compos Sci Technol 63:164710.1016/S0266-3538(03)00066-6 ↗
10. Cooper CA, Young RJ, Halsall M (2001) Composites Part A 32:40110.1016/S1359-835X(00)00107-X ↗
11. Frogley MD, Zhao Q, Wagner HD (2002) Phys Rev B 65:11341310.1103/PhysRevB.65.113413 ↗
12. Kao CC, Young RJ (2004) Compos Sci Technol 64:229110.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.019 ↗
13. Kannan P, Young RJ (2007) Nanotechnology 18:23570710.1088/0957-4484/18/23/235707 ↗
14. Hadiev VG, IIiev MN, Arepalli S, Nikolaev P, Files BS (2001) Appl Phys Lett 78:313910.1063/1.1372340 ↗
15. Cui S, Kinloch IA, Young RJ, Noé L, Monthioux M (2009) Adv Mater 21:1
16. Lucas M, Young RJ (2004) Phys Rev B 69:0854010.1103/PhysRevB.69.085405 ↗
17. Cronin SB, Swan AK, Ünlü MS, Goldberg BB, Dresselhaus MS, Tinkham M (2005) Phys Rev B 72:03542510.1103/PhysRevB.72.035425 ↗
18. Lee SW, Jeong GH, Campbell EEB (2007) Nano Lett 7:259010.1021/nl070877x ↗
19. Kumar R, Cronin SB (2007) Phys Rev B 75:11542110.1103/PhysRevB.75.115421 ↗
20. Rusli R, Eichhorn SJ (2008) Appl Phys Lett 93:03311110.1063/1.2963491 ↗
21. Manufacturer’s datasheet, Huntsman, UK
22. Zhou X, Shin E, Wang KW, Bakis CE (2004) Compos Sci Technol 64:242510.1016/j.compscitech.2004.06.001 ↗
23. Larsen R (2009) J Mater Sci 44:799. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-3155-310.1007/s10853-008-3155-3 ↗
24. Li SQ, Wang F, Wang Y, Wang JW, Ma J, Xiao J (2008) J Mater Sci 43:2653. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-2489-110.1007/s10853-008-2489-1 ↗