journal article·2009-02Open access

Application of the work of indentation approach for the characterization of aluminium 2024-T351 and Al cladding by nanoindentation

M. K. Khan, S. V. Hainsworth, M. E. Fitzpatrick, L. Edwards

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 4

Abstract

Nanoindentation has been used to characterize the mechanical properties of aerospace-grade Al2024-T351 with and without a clad layer of pure aluminium. The clad layer is introduced by means of a roll-bonding process which can cause significant work-hardening of the material in the clad layer. The hardness and Young’s modulus of the pure aluminium and the Al2024 have been determined by a number of methods, including the traditional Oliver and Pharr method, and a number of other methods, including direct measurement of the indentation by atomic force microscopy, and evaluation of the work of indentation. The Oliver and Pharr method was found to underestimate the area of contact as it did not include the area of piled-up material around the indentation periphery. This gave a corresponding overestimation of both hardness and modulus. The area of the indentation measured by atomic force microscopy was similarly found to underestimate the contact area owing to relaxation of material around the indent between indentation and imaging. The work of indentation approach was found to give good agreement between the hardness calculated by nanoindentation and those found in the literature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) J Mater Res 7:156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
2. Kese KO, Li ZC, Bergman B (2004) J Mater Res 19:310910.1557/JMR.2004.0404 ↗
3. Beegan D, Chowdhury S, Laugier MT (2005) Surf Coat Technol 192:5710.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.02.003 ↗
4. Bolshakov A, Pharr GM (1998) J Mater Res 13:104910.1557/JMR.1998.0146 ↗
5. Kese KO, Li ZC, Bergman B (2005) Mater Sci Eng A404:110.1016/j.msea.2005.06.006 ↗
6. Taljat B, Pharr GM (2004) Int J Solids Struct 41:389110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.02.033 ↗
7. Beegan D, Chowdhury S, Laugier MT (2003) Surf Coat Technol 176:12410.1016/S0257-8972(03)00774-6 ↗
8. Kese KO, Li ZC (2006) Scripta Mater 55:69910.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.06.030 ↗
9. Saha R, Nix WD (2001) Mater Sci Eng A319–321:89810.1016/S0921-5093(01)01076-0 ↗
10. Tang C, Li Y, Zeng K (2004) Mater Sci Eng A384:21510.1016/j.msea.2004.06.013 ↗
11. Beegan D, Chowdhury S, Laugier MT (2004) Thin Solid Films 466:16710.1016/j.tsf.2004.03.006 ↗
12. Pharr GM (1998) Mater Sci Eng A253:15110.1016/S0921-5093(98)00724-2 ↗
13. Tuck JR, Korsunky AM, Bull SJ, Davidson RI (2001) Surf Coat Technol 137:21710.1016/S0257-8972(00)01063-X ↗
14. Pothapragada RM, Mirshams RA, Vadlakonda S (2005) Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 880E:BB7.9.110.1557/PROC-880-BB7.9 ↗
15. Zhou L, Yao Y (2007) Mater Sci Eng A460–461:9510.1016/j.msea.2007.01.029 ↗
16. Tuck JR, Korsunsky AM, Davidson RI, Bull SJ, Elliott DM (2000) Surf Coat Technol 127:110.1016/S0257-8972(00)00537-5 ↗
17. Stillwell NA, Tabor D (1961) Proc Phys Soc Lond 78:16910.1088/0370-1328/78/2/302 ↗